Comments on: Biweekly links for 02/02/2009 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-02022009/ Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:56:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Hope Leman http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-02022009/comment-page-1/#comment-17601 Hope Leman Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:48:53 +0000 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=551#comment-17601 Hi, Michael . Thanks so much. And this was edifying from that same post, "What makes this semantic is that it already knows that this is a chemical reaction and not a molecule or a virus." Hi, Michael . Thanks so much. And this was edifying from that same post, “What makes this semantic is that it already knows that this is a chemical reaction and not a molecule or a virus.”

]]> By: Michael Nielsen http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-02022009/comment-page-1/#comment-17580 Michael Nielsen Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:08:12 +0000 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=551#comment-17580 Hope, Just to be clear, that wasn't me writing, but was a quote from the linked post, which itself links to the ChemSpider journal (http://www.chemmantis.com/Issue.aspx ), which I think is a terrific experiment. It'll be very interesting to see how it turns out. As regards your final questions, see my answer to your other comment, which I'm about to write... Hope,

Just to be clear, that wasn’t me writing, but was a quote from the linked post, which itself links to the ChemSpider journal (http://www.chemmantis.com/Issue.aspx ), which I think is a terrific experiment. It’ll be very interesting to see how it turns out. As regards your final questions, see my answer to your other comment, which I’m about to write…

]]> By: Hope Leman http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-02022009/comment-page-1/#comment-17574 Hope Leman Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:33:48 +0000 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=551#comment-17574 "Open peer-review in addition to Open Access..." Open peer-review along what sort of chronological continuum? As I commented elsewhere on your blog just now, there is an interesting discussion the FriendFeed life scientists’ room today about whether there is such a term as "post-publication peer review." Doesn’t peer review take place before publication? Or is it a forever/whenever sort of thing? “Open peer-review in addition to Open Access…” Open peer-review along what sort of chronological continuum? As I commented elsewhere on your blog just now, there is an interesting discussion the FriendFeed life scientists’ room today about whether there is such a term as “post-publication peer review.” Doesn’t peer review take place before publication? Or is it a forever/whenever sort of thing?

]]>