<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biweekly links for 04/07/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-04072008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-04072008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 21:35:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexei</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-04072008/comment-page-1/#comment-10998</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=355#comment-10998</guid>
		<description>The automated scientific discovery is really interesting - but the article explaining it is 18 years old! What happened? Was it not as useful as they thought or is it waiting to be re-discovered?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The automated scientific discovery is really interesting &#8211; but the article explaining it is 18 years old! What happened? Was it not as useful as they thought or is it waiting to be re-discovered?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacks of Science &#8722; Networking Scientific Literature</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-04072008/comment-page-1/#comment-10991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacks of Science &#8722; Networking Scientific Literature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=355#comment-10991</guid>
		<description>[...] It&#039;s not out of our reach either, we have the technology! This post was inspired by a paper, published almost 20 years ago, Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge, which was recently posted on Michael Nielsen&#039;s blog. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It&#8217;s not out of our reach either, we have the technology! This post was inspired by a paper, published almost 20 years ago, Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge, which was recently posted on Michael Nielsen&#8217;s blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

