http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-06122009/ Mon, 07 May 2012 21:35:26 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-06122009/comment-page-1/#comment-23359 Michael Nielsen Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:22:21 +0000 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=623#comment-23359 Arthur - Edited the post (no idea what I was thinking, I knew Blume was no longer E in C). I think the broad thrust of Blume's remarks is very interesting, and contains an important truth. For example, regarding CC licensing, a choice of CC-NC would have quite a restrictive effect down the road, a point John Wilbanks of Science Commons has made often. Personally, my preference would be CC-0, with the expectation that concerns about attribution be enforced normatively (as has always been the case), not legally. Arthur – Edited the post (no idea what I was thinking, I knew Blume was no longer E in C). I think the broad thrust of Blume’s remarks is very interesting, and contains an important truth. For example, regarding CC licensing, a choice of CC-NC would have quite a restrictive effect down the road, a point John Wilbanks of Science Commons has made often. Personally, my preference would be CC-0, with the expectation that concerns about attribution be enforced normatively (as has always been the case), not legally.

]]> http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-06122009/comment-page-1/#comment-23358 Arthur Smith Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:07:29 +0000 http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=623#comment-23358 Note that Marty Blume (no longer E in C) made those comments on copyright more than 10 years ago. The thinking on copyright at APS has definitely evolved, and Creative Commons licensing would likely satisfy at least the concern about future reuse. Note that Marty Blume (no longer E in C) made those comments on copyright more than 10 years ago. The thinking on copyright at APS has definitely evolved, and Creative Commons licensing would likely satisfy at least the concern about future reuse.

]]>