<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biweekly links for 07/21/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-07212008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-07212008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/biweekly-links-for-07212008/comment-page-1/#comment-13244</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=450#comment-13244</guid>
		<description>I came across an interesting example of what may be called &quot;open science&quot; just today: an &quot;open source&quot; project to investigate the feasibility of a proposed solution to carbon sequestration. The project is called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cquestrate.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cquestrate&lt;/a&gt;.

I wonder if it is really about openness, of whether it is a better thought of as an example of crowdsourcing to maker a cheaper feasibility study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across an interesting example of what may be called &#8220;open science&#8221; just today: an &#8220;open source&#8221; project to investigate the feasibility of a proposed solution to carbon sequestration. The project is called <a href="http://www.cquestrate.com/" rel="nofollow">Cquestrate</a>.</p>
<p>I wonder if it is really about openness, of whether it is a better thought of as an example of crowdsourcing to maker a cheaper feasibility study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

