<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantum computing for everyone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MvH</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-39713</link>
		<dc:creator>MvH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 17:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-39713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Dr.Nielsen,

I&#039;ve read and read your explanation of QC, and still i can&#039;t imagine what QC is.
I have no history in engineering/math/science, but I am an avid fan and bystander of science and technology.

So I have some really really stupid questions for you.

1. What would a QC look like? what kind of user interface would it have?
2. What would we use a QC for in day to day life? Or is it rather an instrument for scientific research? 

I have warned you about the ignorance of my questions :)
But I would be very grateful for any thoughts or answers.

Thank you in Advance,
Kind regards,
MvH]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dr.Nielsen,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read and read your explanation of QC, and still i can&#8217;t imagine what QC is.<br />
I have no history in engineering/math/science, but I am an avid fan and bystander of science and technology.</p>
<p>So I have some really really stupid questions for you.</p>
<p>1. What would a QC look like? what kind of user interface would it have?<br />
2. What would we use a QC for in day to day life? Or is it rather an instrument for scientific research? </p>
<p>I have warned you about the ignorance of my questions <img src='http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
But I would be very grateful for any thoughts or answers.</p>
<p>Thank you in Advance,<br />
Kind regards,<br />
MvH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dhara</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-38723</link>
		<dc:creator>Dhara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-38723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Michael Nielsen

I  finished my post graduate in Computer Science.
I want to do Phd in Quantum Computing.
Can i do?
Please give your advise.
What type of knowledge i need for QC.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Michael Nielsen</p>
<p>I  finished my post graduate in Computer Science.<br />
I want to do Phd in Quantum Computing.<br />
Can i do?<br />
Please give your advise.<br />
What type of knowledge i need for QC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave santos</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-37519</link>
		<dc:creator>dave santos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 21:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-37519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael,

The most intuitive QFT and quantum-computing model is Macroscopic Phonons. Suddenly one sees quantum computing processes all around us. 

For example, consider a child&#039;s kite as a basic quantum-computer suited to solve its flight control problem. Consistent with QFT and quantum computing theory, one finds phononic qubit &quot;cells&quot; in the kite stick and membrane field: one pair encodes yaw, another pitch, and so on. The wind itself is a quantum phonon qubit (or packet of qubits). The kitestring is a quibit cell. As these qubits interact as a computer, the kite flies. Its a &quot;quantum robot&quot; :)

On the other hand, a kite cab be designed with no embodied quantum-computed &quot;inherent stabilities&quot;, but instead depend on a complex digital sensor/microcontroller/actuator &quot;classical&quot; control system, which adds prohibitive cost and mass.

The utter elegance of the embodied  phonon-based quantum computation is quite apparent.

Please copy me by email if you have a specific reply to this conjecture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>The most intuitive QFT and quantum-computing model is Macroscopic Phonons. Suddenly one sees quantum computing processes all around us. </p>
<p>For example, consider a child&#8217;s kite as a basic quantum-computer suited to solve its flight control problem. Consistent with QFT and quantum computing theory, one finds phononic qubit &#8220;cells&#8221; in the kite stick and membrane field: one pair encodes yaw, another pitch, and so on. The wind itself is a quantum phonon qubit (or packet of qubits). The kitestring is a quibit cell. As these qubits interact as a computer, the kite flies. Its a &#8220;quantum robot&#8221; <img src='http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>On the other hand, a kite cab be designed with no embodied quantum-computed &#8220;inherent stabilities&#8221;, but instead depend on a complex digital sensor/microcontroller/actuator &#8220;classical&#8221; control system, which adds prohibitive cost and mass.</p>
<p>The utter elegance of the embodied  phonon-based quantum computation is quite apparent.</p>
<p>Please copy me by email if you have a specific reply to this conjecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CIA invests in Canadian company’s quantum computer &#124; Sync™ Blog</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-37431</link>
		<dc:creator>The CIA invests in Canadian company’s quantum computer &#124; Sync™ Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-37431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] really going on is that no simple concrete explanation of quantum computers is possible.” Read his post: it’s about as close to a simple explanation as you’re ever likely to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really going on is that no simple concrete explanation of quantum computers is possible.” Read his post: it’s about as close to a simple explanation as you’re ever likely to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-37016</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2012 17:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-37016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Kingsley - That&#039;s why I put the caveat &quot;believe&quot; in the sentence &quot;quantum computer scientists believe quantum computers can solve problems that are intractable for conventional computers&quot;.  The rest of the essay is conditional on that being true.

Personally, I think this is likely to be true, but perhaps not quite as likely as many quantum computer scientists. Indeed, in some sense I even hope it&#039;s true: it&#039;d be a remarkable breakthrough in our understanding of quantum mechanics!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kingsley &#8211; That&#8217;s why I put the caveat &#8220;believe&#8221; in the sentence &#8220;quantum computer scientists believe quantum computers can solve problems that are intractable for conventional computers&#8221;.  The rest of the essay is conditional on that being true.</p>
<p>Personally, I think this is likely to be true, but perhaps not quite as likely as many quantum computer scientists. Indeed, in some sense I even hope it&#8217;s true: it&#8217;d be a remarkable breakthrough in our understanding of quantum mechanics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kingsley Jones</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-37007</link>
		<dc:creator>Kingsley Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2012 02:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-37007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting attempt at an explanation. However, here is a small curve ball to consider. How would your explanation of the inexplicable look if someone proved (mathematically) that quantum devices evolve according to a scheme of mathematics that is a special case of classical mechanics?

To put this differently.

What would happen to this field if we found out that abstract classical computers could simulate abstract quantum computers of equivalent phase space dimension?

If that were so, then quantum computers would be a special case of classical computers.

Hmmm... Let is hope nobody ever proves any mathematical result like that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting attempt at an explanation. However, here is a small curve ball to consider. How would your explanation of the inexplicable look if someone proved (mathematically) that quantum devices evolve according to a scheme of mathematics that is a special case of classical mechanics?</p>
<p>To put this differently.</p>
<p>What would happen to this field if we found out that abstract classical computers could simulate abstract quantum computers of equivalent phase space dimension?</p>
<p>If that were so, then quantum computers would be a special case of classical computers.</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230; Let is hope nobody ever proves any mathematical result like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Explaining Quantum Computing – Blogroll Memory Hole Rescue &#124; Wavewatching</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-37005</link>
		<dc:creator>Explaining Quantum Computing – Blogroll Memory Hole Rescue &#124; Wavewatching</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 18:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-37005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] there is Michael Nielsen&#039;s take on it, a brilliant write-up illustrating why there is really no reason to expect a simple [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there is Michael Nielsen&#039;s take on it, a brilliant write-up illustrating why there is really no reason to expect a simple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Peter</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-36584</link>
		<dc:creator>John Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-36584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir,
 I have finished seond year of my B.Sc. Physics. I have studied basics in quantum mechanics. I am working on Quantum Computation &amp; Quantum Information for my summer project for two months. But I&#039;m unable to find a topic. Please atleast suggest me a way to find the right topic. Thanks in advance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,<br />
 I have finished seond year of my B.Sc. Physics. I have studied basics in quantum mechanics. I am working on Quantum Computation &amp; Quantum Information for my summer project for two months. But I&#8217;m unable to find a topic. Please atleast suggest me a way to find the right topic. Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-36579</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 22:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-36579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Eacsoft: Glad you found it useful.  Thanks to let me know the credit link is broken.  They seem to have taken it off their site entirely, so I replaced the link with a generic credit link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Eacsoft: Glad you found it useful.  Thanks to let me know the credit link is broken.  They seem to have taken it off their site entirely, so I replaced the link with a generic credit link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eacsoft</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/quantum-computing-for-everyone/comment-page-1/#comment-36547</link>
		<dc:creator>Eacsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 08:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=459#comment-36547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Dr Nielson I think I understand more that I did before reading.

Just letting you know the link in the credit of the image of the atoms is broken, or the resource has been moved.

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/quantum/how_to_entangle_ions.html

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dr Nielson I think I understand more that I did before reading.</p>
<p>Just letting you know the link in the credit of the image of the atoms is broken, or the resource has been moved.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/quantum/how_to_entangle_ions.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/quantum/how_to_entangle_ions.html</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
