<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shirky&#8217;s Law and why (most) social software fails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:38:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shirky&#8217;s Law And Successful Social Software &#171; Steps &#38; Leaps</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-26146</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirky&#8217;s Law And Successful Social Software &#171; Steps &#38; Leaps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-26146</guid>
		<description>[...] so and why some social sites are amazingly successful, I came across a post on this very topic from Michael Nielsen: Shirky’s Law states that the social software most likely to succeed has “a brutally simple [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so and why some social sites are amazingly successful, I came across a post on this very topic from Michael Nielsen: Shirky’s Law states that the social software most likely to succeed has “a brutally simple [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-24329</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-24329</guid>
		<description>Alan Kay&#039;s reading list now at

    http://www.squeakland.org/resources/books/readingList.jsp

Cheers,

-jk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan Kay&#8217;s reading list now at</p>
<p>    <a href="http://www.squeakland.org/resources/books/readingList.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://www.squeakland.org/resources/books/readingList.jsp</a></p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-jk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nielsen &#187; The sincerest form of flattery&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-17202</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nielsen &#187; The sincerest form of flattery&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-17202</guid>
		<description>[...] attribution. Someone named Will Choi has apparently copied without attribution my essay about Shirky&#8217;s Law. (All links given a &#8220;nofollow&#8221; tag.) I&#8217;ve had this kind of copying done by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] attribution. Someone named Will Choi has apparently copied without attribution my essay about Shirky&#8217;s Law. (All links given a &#8220;nofollow&#8221; tag.) I&#8217;ve had this kind of copying done by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snuff</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-17190</link>
		<dc:creator>Snuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-17190</guid>
		<description>Great post, Michael. It&#039;s just appeared, word for word, here &gt;

http://www.simpledog.net/blog/

without any acknowledgement whatsoever. I&#039;ve posted a comment there, (which is awaiting moderation), that the least they could do would be to acknowledge your original post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Michael. It&#8217;s just appeared, word for word, here &gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.simpledog.net/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.simpledog.net/blog/</a></p>
<p>without any acknowledgement whatsoever. I&#8217;ve posted a comment there, (which is awaiting moderation), that the least they could do would be to acknowledge your original post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Links: 2/11/08</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-15415</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Links: 2/11/08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 19:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-15415</guid>
		<description>[...] Shirky’s Law and why (most) social software fails   addthis_pub = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shirky’s Law and why (most) social software fails   addthis_pub = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leitura: Some Trends in Web Application Development &#171; INTO</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-14710</link>
		<dc:creator>Leitura: Some Trends in Web Application Development &#171; INTO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-14710</guid>
		<description>[...] funcionalidades que aderem ao que o usuário. Isto vem seguir também o que o guru da usabilidade Michael Nielsen diz sobre as redes sociais. Nenhum site de sucesso começou com a riqueza de funcionalidades [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] funcionalidades que aderem ao que o usuário. Isto vem seguir também o que o guru da usabilidade Michael Nielsen diz sobre as redes sociais. Nenhum site de sucesso começou com a riqueza de funcionalidades [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /var/log/tumbles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michael Nielsen » Shirky’s Law and why (most) social software fails</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-14693</link>
		<dc:creator>/var/log/tumbles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Michael Nielsen » Shirky’s Law and why (most) social software fails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-14693</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Nielsen » Shirky’s Law and why (most) social software fails Shirky’s Law states that the social software most likely to succeed has “a brutally simple mental model … that’s shared by all users”. ….. You can give friends a simple and compelling explanation of these sites in seconds …. The great majority either fail to obey Shirky’s Law, or else are knockoffs that do little not already done by an existing site.   24 July 2008 in Uncategorized &#124; tags: startups [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Nielsen » Shirky’s Law and why (most) social software fails Shirky’s Law states that the social software most likely to succeed has “a brutally simple mental model … that’s shared by all users”. ….. You can give friends a simple and compelling explanation of these sites in seconds …. The great majority either fail to obey Shirky’s Law, or else are knockoffs that do little not already done by an existing site.   24 July 2008 in Uncategorized | tags: startups [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coderanger.com blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shirky&#8217;s Law and why (most) social software fails</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-13640</link>
		<dc:creator>coderanger.com blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Shirky&#8217;s Law and why (most) social software fails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-13640</guid>
		<description>[...] Shirky&#8217;s Law and why (most) social software fails [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shirky&#8217;s Law and why (most) social software fails [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meemle Labs: The Blog &#187; Shirky&#8217;s Law</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-13584</link>
		<dc:creator>Meemle Labs: The Blog &#187; Shirky&#8217;s Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-13584</guid>
		<description>[...] and blogger, Michael Nielsen has written an informative essay on Shirky&#8217;s Law which states: &#8230;that the social software most likely to succeed has “a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and blogger, Michael Nielsen has written an informative essay on Shirky&#8217;s Law which states: &#8230;that the social software most likely to succeed has “a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Texas Tips</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/shirkys-law-and-why-most-social-software-fails/comment-page-1/#comment-13560</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Texas Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 05:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=451#comment-13560</guid>
		<description>Great essay! I think you hit the nail squarely on the head.

At the end of the day, the success of social software is judged by the number of users it attracts. Twitter has a variety of limitations and technical issues, but also a lot of users. Why? Because of (a) the way it allows you to interact was unlike anything else widely used and (b) a large, growing community of frequent users. 

Shirky was right, and so are you. It was a very astute observation that software developers do not think from the community perspective. Maybe you should send this post for inclusion in some of their trade publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great essay! I think you hit the nail squarely on the head.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, the success of social software is judged by the number of users it attracts. Twitter has a variety of limitations and technical issues, but also a lot of users. Why? Because of (a) the way it allows you to interact was unlike anything else widely used and (b) a large, growing community of frequent users. </p>
<p>Shirky was right, and so are you. It was a very astute observation that software developers do not think from the community perspective. Maybe you should send this post for inclusion in some of their trade publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
