<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:45:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Cheung</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-4/#comment-39766</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey Cheung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-39766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Michael, 
Thank you for your quality essay. I am an aspiring economist and I am interested in science as a whole too. Economics academia is no different than that of science. After your essay and the comments above. I have few quick thoughts. 
1. I agree with some readers that scientists have too high workload.  Some barely have time reading blogs of their counterparts, which I think is a great lost. 
2. I am really grateful so many people offered insightful and thoughtful comment. But I can&#039;t agree with information overload brought up by a reader more. I did not scrutinize all comments thought I know some if not majority will be interesting. I always have this love/hate feelings for comments. 
3.  An economist Paul Krugman shares your view. http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/in-praise-of-econowonkery/
4. I look forward to your essay about quantifying contributions. 
(On quantifying contributions: you’re absolutely right, there’s all kinds of questions here. It really needs a separate essay. I hope to come back to it at length later.)
5. There is a project called Edge www.edge.org which assembles scientists in a online discussion salon. I love this initiative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,<br />
Thank you for your quality essay. I am an aspiring economist and I am interested in science as a whole too. Economics academia is no different than that of science. After your essay and the comments above. I have few quick thoughts.<br />
1. I agree with some readers that scientists have too high workload.  Some barely have time reading blogs of their counterparts, which I think is a great lost.<br />
2. I am really grateful so many people offered insightful and thoughtful comment. But I can&#8217;t agree with information overload brought up by a reader more. I did not scrutinize all comments thought I know some if not majority will be interesting. I always have this love/hate feelings for comments.<br />
3.  An economist Paul Krugman shares your view. <a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/in-praise-of-econowonkery/" rel="nofollow">http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/11/in-praise-of-econowonkery/</a><br />
4. I look forward to your essay about quantifying contributions.<br />
(On quantifying contributions: you’re absolutely right, there’s all kinds of questions here. It really needs a separate essay. I hope to come back to it at length later.)<br />
5. There is a project called Edge <a href="http://www.edge.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.edge.org</a> which assembles scientists in a online discussion salon. I love this initiative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Is Science Behind A Paywall? &#124; Gizmodo Australia</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-4/#comment-39760</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Is Science Behind A Paywall? &#124; Gizmodo Australia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 05:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-39760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] scientists to pursue their research in a stable, funded environment. By subsidizing research, they hoped to aid its creation and dissemination for society’s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scientists to pursue their research in a stable, funded environment. By subsidizing research, they hoped to aid its creation and dissemination for society’s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Por qué las publicaciones científicas están amuralladas detrás de un muro de pagos?</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-4/#comment-39741</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Por qué las publicaciones científicas están amuralladas detrás de un muro de pagos?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-39741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] se ha mantenido como una constante relativa el sistema desarrollado en el siglo XVII. Como indica el físico reconvertido en escritor de ciencia Michael Nielsen, este sistema facilitó &#8220;una [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] se ha mantenido como una constante relativa el sistema desarrollado en el siglo XVII. Como indica el físico reconvertido en escritor de ciencia Michael Nielsen, este sistema facilitó &#8220;una [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Future of Science &#171; Working Scientist</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-4/#comment-38464</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future of Science &#171; Working Scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-38464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/ [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/" rel="nofollow">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilan de mes apprentissages &#171; Web social</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-3/#comment-37387</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilan de mes apprentissages &#171; Web social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 02:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-37387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 20 ans, j&#8217;ose espérer que les faits relatés par Michael Nielsen dans The Future of Science soient désormais chose du passé. Je souhaite toutefois que la contribution collaborative entre [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20 ans, j&#8217;ose espérer que les faits relatés par Michael Nielsen dans The Future of Science soient désormais chose du passé. Je souhaite toutefois que la contribution collaborative entre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polyclimate &#124; Climate Etc.</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-3/#comment-37327</link>
		<dc:creator>Polyclimate &#124; Climate Etc.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-37327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Essay on The Future of Science [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Essay on The Future of Science [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nascent: Social Not Working? : Nascent</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-3/#comment-37119</link>
		<dc:creator>Nascent: Social Not Working? : Nascent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-37119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Michael Nielsen has pointed out, a system designed to encourage scientists to share their results through scholarly journals is now [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Nielsen has pointed out, a system designed to encourage scientists to share their results through scholarly journals is now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #BoraZUofA Linkfest: A further collection of the sites and posts referenced in Bora&#8217;s talks &#171; Boundary Vision</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-3/#comment-36269</link>
		<dc:creator>#BoraZUofA Linkfest: A further collection of the sites and posts referenced in Bora&#8217;s talks &#171; Boundary Vision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-36269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and journalism is getting blurry….again Why Academics Should Blog: A College of One’s Own The Future of Science Visualizing Enlightenment- Era Social Networks “There are some people who don’t wait.” Robert [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and journalism is getting blurry….again Why Academics Should Blog: A College of One’s Own The Future of Science Visualizing Enlightenment- Era Social Networks “There are some people who don’t wait.” Robert [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: open science, a primer &#171; C.DLT</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-3/#comment-35858</link>
		<dc:creator>open science, a primer &#171; C.DLT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-35858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Faraday’s advice to his junior colleague to: “Work. Finish. Publish.” needs to be revised. It shouldn’t be enough to publish a paper anymore. If we want open [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Faraday’s advice to his junior colleague to: “Work. Finish. Publish.” needs to be revised. It shouldn’t be enough to publish a paper anymore. If we want open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opening the Door to Closeted Science&#8211;Sarah Greene &#124; Knowledge of Medicine</title>
		<link>http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/comment-page-3/#comment-35776</link>
		<dc:creator>Opening the Door to Closeted Science&#8211;Sarah Greene &#124; Knowledge of Medicine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 08:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/?p=448#comment-35776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
