Difference between revisions of "Meissel-Lehmer method"

From Polymath1Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: The '''Meissel-Lehmer method''' is a combinatorial method for computing <math>\pi(x)</math> in time/space <math>x^{2/3+o(1)}</math>. Define an <math>x^{1/3}</math>-''almost prime'' to be ...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''Meissel-Lehmer method''' is a combinatorial method for computing <math>\pi(x)</math> in time/space <math>x^{2/3+o(1)}</math>.
+
The '''Meissel-Lehmer method''' is a combinatorial method for computing <math>\pi(x)</math> in time/space <math>x^{2/3+o(1)}</math>. It is analysed at [http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/arch/meissel.lehmer.pdf LMO???]
  
 
Define an <math>x^{1/3}</math>-''almost prime'' to be an integer less than x not divisible by any prime less than <math>x^{1/3}</math>; such a number is either a prime, or a product of two primes which are between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x^{2/3}</math>.  Each number of the latter form can be written in two ways as the product of a prime p between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x^{2/3}</math>, and a prime between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x/p</math>, except for the squares of primes between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x^{1/2}</math> which only have one such representation.  The number of almost primes less than x is thus
 
Define an <math>x^{1/3}</math>-''almost prime'' to be an integer less than x not divisible by any prime less than <math>x^{1/3}</math>; such a number is either a prime, or a product of two primes which are between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x^{2/3}</math>.  Each number of the latter form can be written in two ways as the product of a prime p between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x^{2/3}</math>, and a prime between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x/p</math>, except for the squares of primes between <math>x^{1/3}</math> and <math>x^{1/2}</math> which only have one such representation.  The number of almost primes less than x is thus

Revision as of 11:35, 22 August 2009

The Meissel-Lehmer method is a combinatorial method for computing [math]\pi(x)[/math] in time/space [math]x^{2/3+o(1)}[/math]. It is analysed at LMO???

Define an [math]x^{1/3}[/math]-almost prime to be an integer less than x not divisible by any prime less than [math]x^{1/3}[/math]; such a number is either a prime, or a product of two primes which are between [math]x^{1/3}[/math] and [math]x^{2/3}[/math]. Each number of the latter form can be written in two ways as the product of a prime p between [math]x^{1/3}[/math] and [math]x^{2/3}[/math], and a prime between [math]x^{1/3}[/math] and [math]x/p[/math], except for the squares of primes between [math]x^{1/3}[/math] and [math]x^{1/2}[/math] which only have one such representation. The number of almost primes less than x is thus

[math] \pi(x) - \pi(x^{1/3}) + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{x^{1/3} \leq p \leq x^{2/3}} [\pi( x/p ) - \pi(x^{1/3})] + \frac{1}{2} (\pi(x^{1/2})-\pi(x^{1/3}))[/math] (1)

(ignoring some floor and ceiling functions).

Using the sieve of Erathosthenes, one can compute [math]\pi(y)[/math] for all [math]y \leq x^{2/3}[/math] in time/space [math]x^{2/3+o(1)}[/math], so every expression in (1) is computable in this time except for [math]\pi(x)[/math]. So it will suffice to compute the number of [math]x^{1/3}[/math]-almost primes less than x in time [math]x^{2/3+o(1)}[/math].

If we let [math]\pi(x,a)[/math] denote the number of a-almost primes less than x (i.e. the number of integers less than x not divisible by any integer between 2 and a), we have the recurrence

[math]\pi(x,a) = \pi(x,a-1) - \pi(x/a, a)[/math]

which reflects the basic fact that the a-1-almost primes are the union of the a-almost primes, and the a-1-almost primes multiplied by a. On the other hand, by factoring all the numbers up to [math]x^{2/3}[/math] by the sieve of Eratosthenes, we can store [math]\pi(y,a)[/math] for all [math]a, y \leq x^{2/3}[/math], to be retrievable in O(1) time. One can then show by induction that [math]\pi(y,a)[/math] is computable for larger a,y in time [math] O_\varepsilon( (ay)^{1+\varepsilon} / x^{2/3} )[/math] for any [math]\varepsilon \gt 0[/math], which gives the [math]x^{2/3+o(1)}[/math] algorithm.

[ Note: the above paragraph needs to be checked ]