# Difference between revisions of "The Erdos-Rado sunflower lemma"

m (→Bibliography) |
(added small values) |
||

Line 53: | Line 53: | ||

<B>Disproven for <math>k=3,r=3</math></B>: set <math>|V_1|=|V_2|=|V_3|=3</math> and use ijk to denote the 3-set consisting of the i^th element of V_1, j^th element of V_2, and k^th element of V_3. Then 000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 112, 122, 212 is a balanced family of 9 3-sets without a 3-sunflower. | <B>Disproven for <math>k=3,r=3</math></B>: set <math>|V_1|=|V_2|=|V_3|=3</math> and use ijk to denote the 3-set consisting of the i^th element of V_1, j^th element of V_2, and k^th element of V_3. Then 000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 112, 122, 212 is a balanced family of 9 3-sets without a 3-sunflower. | ||

+ | == Small values == | ||

+ | |||

+ | Below is a collection of known constructions for small values, taken from Abbott-Exoo. | ||

+ | Boldface stands for matching upper bound (and best known upper bounds are planned to be added to other entries). | ||

+ | Also note that for <math>k</math> fixed we have <math>f(k,r)=k^r+o(k^r)</math> from Kostochka-Rödl-Talysheva. | ||

+ | |||

+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||

+ | ! style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" | r\k | ||

+ | ! style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 2 | ||

+ | ! style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 3 | ||

+ | ! style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 4 | ||

+ | ! style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 5 | ||

+ | ! style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 6 | ||

+ | ! style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic;" | k | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 3 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right; font-weight: bold;" | 6 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right; font-weight: bold;" | 20 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 54- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 160- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 600- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center;" | ~3.16^k | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 4 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right; font-weight: bold;" | 10 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 38- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 114- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 380- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 1444- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center;" | ~3.36^k | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 5 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right; font-weight: bold;" | 20 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 88- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 400- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 1760- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 8000- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center;" | ~4.24^k | ||

+ | |- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center; font-style: italic;" | 6 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right; font-weight: bold;" | 27 | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 146- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 730- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 3942- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: right;" | 21316- | ||

+ | | style="text-align: center;" | ~5.26^k | ||

+ | |} | ||

== Threads == | == Threads == | ||

Line 78: | Line 125: | ||

* An intersection theorem for systems of sets, A. V. Kostochka, Random Structures and Algorithms, 9 (1996), 213-221. | * An intersection theorem for systems of sets, A. V. Kostochka, Random Structures and Algorithms, 9 (1996), 213-221. | ||

* [http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~kostochk/docs/2000/survey3.pdf Extremal problems on <math>\Delta</math>-systems], A. V. Kostochka | * [http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~kostochk/docs/2000/survey3.pdf Extremal problems on <math>\Delta</math>-systems], A. V. Kostochka | ||

+ | * On Systems of Small Sets with No Large Δ-Subsystems, A. V. Kostochka, V. Rödl, and L. A. Talysheva, Comb. Probab. Comput. 8 (1999), 265-268. | ||

* [http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4196 On Erdos' extremal problem on matchings in hypergraphs], T. Luczak, K. Mieczkowska | * [http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.4196 On Erdos' extremal problem on matchings in hypergraphs], T. Luczak, K. Mieczkowska | ||

* Intersection theorems for systems of sets, J. H. Spencer, Canad. Math. Bull. 20 (1977), 249-254. | * Intersection theorems for systems of sets, J. H. Spencer, Canad. Math. Bull. 20 (1977), 249-254. |

## Revision as of 17:33, 28 November 2015

## Contents

## The problem

A *sunflower* (a.k.a. *Delta-system*) of size [math]r[/math] is a family of sets [math]A_1, A_2, \dots, A_r[/math] such that every element that belongs to more than one of the sets belongs to all of them. A basic and simple result of Erdos and Rado asserts that

**Erdos-Rado Delta-system theorem**: There is a function [math]f(k,r)[/math] so that every family [math]\cal F[/math] of [math]k[/math]-sets with more than [math]f(k,r)[/math] members contains a sunflower of size [math]r[/math].

(We denote by [math]f(k,r)[/math] the smallest integer that suffices for the assertion of the theorem to be true.) The simple proof giving [math]f(k,r)\le k! (r-1)^k[/math] can be found here.

The best known general upper bound on [math]f(k,r)[/math] (in the regime where [math]r[/math] is bounded and [math]k[/math] is large) is

- [math]\displaystyle f(k,r) \leq D(r,\alpha) k! \left( \frac{(\log\log\log k)^2}{\alpha \log\log k} \right)^k[/math]

for any [math]\alpha \lt 1[/math], and some [math]D(r,\alpha)[/math] depending on [math]r,\alpha[/math], proven by Kostkocha from 1996. The objective of this project is to improve this bound, ideally to obtain the Erdos-Rado conjecture

- [math]\displaystyle f(k,r) \leq C^k [/math]

for some [math]C=C(r)[/math] depending on [math]r[/math] only. This is known for [math]r=1,2[/math](indeed we have [math]f(k,r)=1[/math] in those cases) but remains open for larger r.

## Variants and notation

Given a family F of sets and a set S, the *star* of S is the subfamily of those sets in F containing S, and the *link* of S is obtained from the star of S by deleting the elements of S from every set in the star. (We use the terms link and star because we do want to consider eventually hypergraphs as geometric/topological objects.)

We can restate the delta system problem as follows: f(k,r) is the maximum size of a family of k-sets such that the link of every set A does not contain r pairwise disjoint sets.

Let f(k,r;m,n) denote the largest cardinality of a family of k-sets from {1,2,…,n} such that that the link of every set A of size at most m-1 does not contain r pairwise disjoint sets. Thus f(k,r) = f(k,r;k,n) for n large enough.

**Conjecture 1**: [math]f(k,r;m,n) \leq C_r^k n^{k-m}[/math] for some [math]C_r[/math] depending only on r.

This conjecture implies the Erdos-Ko-Rado conjecture (set m=k). The Erdos-Ko-Rado theorem asserts that

- [math]f(k,2;1,n) = \binom{n-1}{k-1}[/math] (1)

when [math]n \geq 2k[/math], which is consistent with Conjecture 1. More generally, Erdos, Ko, and Rado showed

- [math]f(k,2;m,n) = \binom{n-m}{k-m}[/math]

when [math]n[/math] is sufficiently large depending on k,m. The case of smaller n was treated by several authors culminating in the work of Ahlswede and Khachatrian.

Erdos conjectured that

- [math]f(k,r;1,n) = \max( \binom{rk-1}{k}, \binom{n}{k} - \binom{n-r}{k} )[/math]

for [math]n \geq rk[/math], generalising (1), and again consistent with Conjecture 1. This was established for k=2 by Erdos and Gallai, and for r=3 by Frankl (building on work by Luczak-Mieczkowska).

A family of k-sets is *balanced* (or *k-colored*) if it is possible to color the elements with k colors so that every set in the family is colorful.

**Reduction (folklore)**: It is enough to prove Erdos-Rado Delta-system conjecture for the balanced case.

**Proof**: Divide the elements into d color classes at random and take only colorful sets. The expected size of the surviving colorful sets is k!/k^k|F|.

**Hyperoptimistic conjecture:** The maximum size of a balanced collection of k-sets without a sunflower of size r is (r-1)^k.

**Disproven for [math]k=3,r=3[/math]**: set [math]|V_1|=|V_2|=|V_3|=3[/math] and use ijk to denote the 3-set consisting of the i^th element of V_1, j^th element of V_2, and k^th element of V_3. Then 000, 001, 010, 011, 100, 101, 112, 122, 212 is a balanced family of 9 3-sets without a 3-sunflower.

## Small values

Below is a collection of known constructions for small values, taken from Abbott-Exoo. Boldface stands for matching upper bound (and best known upper bounds are planned to be added to other entries). Also note that for [math]k[/math] fixed we have [math]f(k,r)=k^r+o(k^r)[/math] from Kostochka-Rödl-Talysheva.

r\k | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | k |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

3 | 6 | 20 | 54- | 160- | 600- | ~3.16^k |

4 | 10 | 38- | 114- | 380- | 1444- | ~3.36^k |

5 | 20 | 88- | 400- | 1760- | 8000- | ~4.24^k |

6 | 27 | 146- | 730- | 3942- | 21316- | ~5.26^k |

## Threads

- Polymath10: The Erdos Rado Delta System Conjecture, Gil Kalai, Nov 2, 2015.
*Inactive* - Polymath10, Post 2: Homological Approach, Gil Kalai, Nov 10, 2015.
**Active**

## External links

- Erdos-Ko-Rado theorem (Wikipedia article)
- Sunflower (mathematics) (Wikipedia article)
- What is the best lower bound for 3-sunflowers? (Mathoverflow)

## Bibliography

Edits to improve the bibliography (by adding more links, Mathscinet numbers, bibliographic info, etc.) are welcome!

- On set systems not containing delta systems, H. L. Abbott and G. Exoo, Graphs and Combinatorics 8 (1992), 1–9.
- On finite [math]\Delta[/math]-systems, H. L. Abbott and D. Hanson, Discrete Math. 8 (1974), 1-12.
- Intersection theorems for systems of sets, H. L. Abbott, D. Hanson, and N. Sauer, J. Comb. Th. Ser. A 12 (1972), 381–389.
- Hodge theory for combinatorial geometries, Karim Adiprasito, June Huh, and Erick Katz
- The Complete Nontrivial-Intersection Theorem for Systems of Finite Sets, R. Ahlswede, L. Khachatrian, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 76, 121-138 (1996).
- Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets, P. Erdős, C. Ko, R. Rado, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics. Oxford. Second Series 12: 313–320 (1961), doi:10.1093/qmath/12.1.313.
- Intersection theorems for systems of sets, P. Erdős, R. Rado, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Second Series 35 (1960), 85–90.
- On the Maximum Number of Edges in a Hypergraph with Given Matching Number, P. Frankl
- An intersection theorem for systems of sets, A. V. Kostochka, Random Structures and Algorithms, 9 (1996), 213-221.
- Extremal problems on [math]\Delta[/math]-systems, A. V. Kostochka
- On Systems of Small Sets with No Large Δ-Subsystems, A. V. Kostochka, V. Rödl, and L. A. Talysheva, Comb. Probab. Comput. 8 (1999), 265-268.
- On Erdos' extremal problem on matchings in hypergraphs, T. Luczak, K. Mieczkowska
- Intersection theorems for systems of sets, J. H. Spencer, Canad. Math. Bull. 20 (1977), 249-254.