{"id":608,"date":"2009-05-22T06:53:08","date_gmt":"2009-05-22T10:53:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/?p=608"},"modified":"2009-05-22T06:53:08","modified_gmt":"2009-05-22T10:53:08","slug":"biweekly-links-for-05222009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/biweekly-links-for-05222009\/","title":{"rendered":"Biweekly links for 05\/22\/2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/gowers.wordpress.com\/2009\/05\/20\/a-solution-to-an-exposition-problem\/#more-572\">A solution to an exposition problem \u00c2\u00ab Gowers\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Weblog<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;Let me explain the title of this post by quoting from Timothy Chow\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s highly recommended expository article A beginner\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s guide to forcing: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153All mathematicians are familiar with the concept of an open research problem. I propose the less familiar concept of an open exposition problem. Solving an open exposition problem means explaining a mathematical subject in a way that renders it totally perspicuous. Every step should be motivated and clear; ideally, students should feel that they could have arrived at the results themselves.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/openresearch.sebpaquet.net\/2009\/05\/stocks-flows-and-upkeep-in-social-media.html\">Seb&#8217;s Open Research: Stocks, Flows, and Upkeep in Social Media<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li>Seb Paquet&#8217;s exegesis of an experiment in mass collaborative drawing.  Vandalism, designing good social media, persistent social structures, and many other topics&#8230;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/conflate.net\/icml\/\">ICML Discussion Site [ICML Discussion]<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;The aim of this site is to enable the research community to discuss papers accepted to ICML [International Conference on Machine Learning]. Each paper accepted to ICML 2008 has a page on this site. Each page has details of the paper and a discussion thread. &#8220;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.usemod.com\/cgi-bin\/mb.pl?WikiLifeCycle\">Meatball Wiki: WikiLifeCycle<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.citeulike.org\/groupfunc\/3808\/home\">CiteULike: Group on Statistical Machine Learning<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/latticeqcd.blogspot.com\/2009\/05\/openness-fraud.html\">Life on the lattice: Openness >> fraud<\/a>\n<ul>\n<li>&#8220;Sch\u00c3\u00b6n&#8217;s deception was only possible because the researchers who tried and failed to replicate his results didn&#8217;t have access to his primary data. Once doubts had been raised over the appearance of two completely identical graphs supposedly representing two completely different sets of experimental data, Sch\u00c3\u00b6n&#8217;s primary data were subjected to close scrutiny and were found to be non-existent &#8212; his labbooks had been destroyed, and his samples were damaged beyond recovery. This raises the question whether it would have been possible to even contemplate such a fraud in an environment where scientists are genuinely expected to hide nothing, and in particular to make their primary data publicly available after publication.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Click <a href=\"http:\/\/delicious.com\/nielsen\/\">here<\/a> for all of my del.icio.us bookmarks.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A solution to an exposition problem \u00c2\u00ab Gowers\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Weblog &#8220;Let me explain the title of this post by quoting from Timothy Chow\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s highly recommended expository article A beginner\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s guide to forcing: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153All mathematicians are familiar with the concept of an open research problem. I propose the less familiar concept of an open exposition problem. Solving&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/biweekly-links-for-05222009\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Biweekly links for 05\/22\/2009<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/michaelnielsen.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}