<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lior</id>
	<title>Polymath Wiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Lior"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Lior"/>
	<updated>2026-04-07T07:24:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10719</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10719"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T04:23:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: Reverting premature edits&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10718</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10718"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:22:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{1-4t}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We fix a set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D = \left\{ d_j\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of relatively prime integers congruent to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; mod &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Xi_D = \left{\xi_d\}_{d\in D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the associated algebraic integers and let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K = \mathbb{Q}(\Xi_D) = \mathbb{Q}\left(\{\sqrt{d}\}_{d\in D}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the field generated by the square roots of numbers in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K = \mathbb{Z}[\Xi_D]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with one integral basis being &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left\{ \prod_{d\in N}\xi_d \right\}_{N\subset D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10717</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10717"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:22:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{1-4t}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We fix a set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D = \left\{ d_j\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of relatively prime integers congruent to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; mod &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Xi_D = \left{\xi_d\}_{d\in D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the associated algebraic integers and let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K = \mathbb{Q}(\Xi_D) = \mathbb{Q}\left(\{\sqrt{d}\}_{d\in D}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the field generated by the square roots of numbers in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = \mathbb{Z}[\Xi_D]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with one integral basis being &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left\{ \prod_{d\in N}\xi_d \right\}_{N\subset D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10716</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10716"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:22:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{1-4t}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We fix a set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D = \left\{ d_j\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of relatively prime integers congruent to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; mod &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Xi_D = \left{\xi_d\}_{d\in D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the associated algebraic integers and let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K = \mathbb{Q}(\Xi_D) = \mathbb{Q}\left(\{\sqrt{d}\}_{d\in D}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the field generated by the square roots of numbers in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = \mathbb{Z}[\Xi_D]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with one integral basis being &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left\{ \prod_{d\in N}\xi_d \right\}_{N\subset D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10715</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10715"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:21:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */ the ring of integers&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{1-4t}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We fix a set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D = \left\{ d_j\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of relatively prime integers congruent to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; mod &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Xi_D = \left{\xi_d\}_{d\in D}$ and let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K = \mathbb{Q}(\Xi_D) = \mathbb{Q}\left(\{\sqrt{d}\}_{d\in D}\right)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be the field generated by the square roots of numbers in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;D&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{O}_K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; = \mathbb{Z}[\Xi_D]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with one integral basis being &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\left\{ \prod_{d\in N}\xi_d \right\}_{N\subset D}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10714</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10714"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:14:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{1-4t}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10713</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10713"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:13:56Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{4t-1}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10712</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10712"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:13:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Rings generated by quadratic irrationals */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; so that the ring of integers of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{d})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\xi_d] = \mathbb{Z}\oplus \mathbb{Z}.\xi_d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{4t-1}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10711</id>
		<title>Algebraic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Algebraic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10711"/>
		<updated>2018-05-08T03:12:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: Starting to include the general result&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Given a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_distance_graph unit distance graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the edges of the graph are formed by a set of vectors &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of unit length. Often a single vector is used many times in the same graph for different edges. The vectors generate an infinite abelian group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{G}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; under addition. The [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cayley_graph Cayley graph] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Gamma(\mathcal{G},S)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a unit distance graph that will contain &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; as a subgraph. A coloring of the Cayley graph reduces to a coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and is an efficient way to set an upper bound on its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring chromatic number].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In two dimensions it is useful to identify the vectors with complex numbers. For example the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein_integer Eisenstein integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are generated by an equilateral triangle or hexagon with unit length sides. These are complex numbers of the form &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z = a + b\omega, a,b \in \mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega = \frac{1 + i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a cube root of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. A 3-colouring is given by a mapping to the group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; defined by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) = x \in \mathbb{Z}, x \equiv a - b \bmod{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. To verify that this is valid it is sufficient to check that no element of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}[\omega]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which is of unit modulus is sent to the identity (zero) in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbb{Z}_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that in general a group generated in this way will not be a simple [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_Group lattice] and in most cases it will be formed from vertices that are dense in the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-coloring is &#039;&#039;&#039;linear&#039;&#039;&#039; if it is given by a group homomorphism onto a finite group of order &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Cayley graph of a group enables us to consider the colorability of graphs formed from all possible repeated &#039;&#039;&#039;Minkowski sums&#039;&#039;&#039; of a graph with itself. Another operation used to create graphs is &#039;&#039;&#039;spindling&#039;&#039;&#039; where a graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is combined with a copy of itself rotated about one of its vertices through an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the complex plane the center of rotation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at zero and another point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; connected by an edge &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;OA&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; can be placed at one in the complex plane. The rotation takes &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;A&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; to the point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;B&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; at &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau = e^{i\theta}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. All other points given by complex numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are rotated to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. The combination of all possible spindlings and Minkowski sums is therefore contained in the Cayley graph of a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathbb{Z}[\tau_1,...,\tau_n] \subset \mathbb{C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; generated from a set of complex numbers of unit modulus. More specifically &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; ia an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_domain integral domain]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The generators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\tau_i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are chosen so as to add new edges in the graph in addition to themselves. This will makes them [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_number algebraic numbers]. If they are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebraic_integer Algebraic integers] then the additive group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\mathcal{R}, +)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will be finitely generated. In most cases they are not algebraic integers, but any algebraic number is equal to an algebraic integer divided by a (rational) integer. The ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is therefore a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_integers ring of algebraic integers] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; extended with some finite set of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_fraction unit fractions] &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{R} = \mathcal{Z}\left[\frac{1}{n_1},...,\frac{1}{n_m}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. In the simplest cases &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a ring of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_integer quadratic integers] making its elements easy to describe in terms of sums of square roots.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;example:&#039;&#039; The squared distances between points on the triangular lattice given by the Eisenstein integers in the complex plane are integers from the sequence of [https://oeis.org/A003136 Loeschian numbers]. Spindling this lattice through angles &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \exp(i\arccos(1 - \tfrac{1}{2t}))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; will form new edges of unit length at the base of isosceles triangles with two sides equal to these distances. In particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is used to generate a ring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}[\omega_1, \omega_3, \overline{\omega_3}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which contains [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindles]. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_1 = \omega = \frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_3 = \frac{5 + i\sqrt{11}}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This ring can also be given as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \mathbb{Z}\left[{\frac{1+i\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+i\sqrt{11}}{2}, \frac{1}{3}}\right]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; where the first two generators are algebraic integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In explicit form it is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathcal{M} = \left\{\frac{a+ib\sqrt{3}+ic\sqrt{c}+d\sqrt{33}}{3^k} : a,b,c,d,k \in \mathbb{Z}, a \equiv b \equiv c \equiv d \bmod 2, a+b+c-d \equiv 0 \bmod 4, k \ge 0\right\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rings generated by quadratic irrationals ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; d\equiv 1\,(4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\xi_d = \frac{1+\sqrt{d}}{2}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = 1-4t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\omega_t = \frac{2t+1+i\sqrt{4t-1}}{2t}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Probabilistic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10646</id>
		<title>Probabilistic formulation of Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Probabilistic_formulation_of_Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10646"/>
		<updated>2018-05-04T22:41:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: replaced HTML hyperlink with wiki link&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&#039;&#039;This is a part of Polymath16 - for the main page, see [[Hadwiger-Nelson problem]].&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose for sake of contradiction that we have a 4-coloring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c: {\bf C} \to \{1,2,3,4\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the complex plane with no unit edges monochromatic, thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c(z) \neq c(w) \hbox{ whenever } |z-w| = 1. \quad (1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can create further such colorings by composing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left with a permutation &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma \in S_4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the left, and with the (inverse of) a Euclidean isometry &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;T \in E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on the right, thus creating a new coloring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma \circ c \circ T^{-1}: {\bf C} \to \{1,2,3,4\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of the complex plane with the same property.  This is an action of the solvable group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a fact that all solvable groups (viewed as discrete groups) are [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amenable_group amenable], so in particular &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is amenable.  This means that there is a finitely additive probability measure &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (with all subsets of this group measurable), which is left-invariant:  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mu(gE) = \mu(E)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;g \in S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;E \subset S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  This gives &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; the structure of a finitely additive probability space.  We can then define a random coloring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\mathbf c}: {\bf C} \to \{1,2,3,4\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; by defining &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\mathbf c} := {\mathbf \sigma} \circ c \circ {\mathbf T}^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, where &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;({\mathbf \sigma},{\mathbf T})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is the element of the sample space &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Thus for any complex number &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the random color &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\mathbf c}(z)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a random variable taking values in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\{1,2,3,4\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  The left-invariance of the measure implies that for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\sigma,T) \in S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the coloring &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \sigma \circ {\mathbf c} \circ T^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has the same law as &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\mathbf c}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  This gives the color permutation invariance&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(z_1) = c_1, \dots, {\mathbf c}(z_k) = c_k ) = {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(z_1) = \sigma(c_1), \dots, {\mathbf c}(z_k) = \sigma(c_k) )\quad (2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z_1,\dots,z_k \in {\bf C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c_1,\dots,c_k \in \{1,2,3,4\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sigma \in S_4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the Euclidean isometry invariance&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(z_1) = c_1, \dots, {\mathbf c}(z_k) = c_k ) = {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(T(z_1)) = c_1, \dots, {\mathbf c}(T(z_k)) = c_k. \quad (3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
(In probabilistic language, this means that the random coloring is a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stationary_process stationary process] with respect to the action of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;S_4 \times E(2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  The extraction of a stationary process from a deterministic object is an example of the &#039;&#039;Furstenberg correspondence principle&#039;&#039;.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bounds on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(d) )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for 4-colourings ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A class of correlations that is of particular interest is that of vertex pairs at some distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! distance !! Lower bound !! Lower-bounding graph !! Upper bound !! Upper-bounding graph !! Notes&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \geq 1/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| 1/2&lt;br /&gt;
| Spindle&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \geq 1/(n \sqrt{3})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(3n-2)/3n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| (n+1)-gon with one edge length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and the rest d&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| Unit edge&lt;br /&gt;
| 0&lt;br /&gt;
| Unit edge&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/28&lt;br /&gt;
| Unit diamond plus centres of triangles, together with H&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/3&lt;br /&gt;
| Unit triangle plus its centre&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/6&lt;br /&gt;
| H&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/2&lt;br /&gt;
| Spindle&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\sqrt{3}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/4&lt;br /&gt;
| H&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/2&lt;br /&gt;
| Spindle&lt;br /&gt;
| Consider the opposite ends of a double triangle and permutations of colours to obtain the exact value 1/2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/5&lt;br /&gt;
| regular pentagon with unit side length&lt;br /&gt;
| 2/5&lt;br /&gt;
| regular pentagon with unit side length&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\sqrt{11/3}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/118&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{40}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/2&lt;br /&gt;
| Spindle&lt;br /&gt;
| computer-verified&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8/3&lt;br /&gt;
| 1&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \oplus V \oplus H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| 1/2&lt;br /&gt;
| Spindle&lt;br /&gt;
| computer-verified; leads to contradiction&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Proofs of bounds ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One can compute some correlations of the coloring exactly:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039;  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z,w \in {\bf C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|z-w|=1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Then&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(z) = c ) = \frac{1}{4}\quad (4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c=1,\dots,4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(z) = \mathbf{c}(w) ) = 0\quad (5),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(z) = c; \mathbf{c}(w) = c&#039; ) = \frac{1}{12} \quad (6)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
for any distinct &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;c,c&#039; \in \{1,2,3,4\}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;u&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is at a unit distance from both z and w, then&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(z) = c; \mathbf{c}(w) = c&#039;; \mathbf{c}(u) = c&#039;&#039; ) = \frac{1}{24} \quad (6&#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;  By color invariance (2), the four probabilities in (4) are equal and sum to 1, giving (4).  The claim (5) is immediate from (1).  From (5) and color invariance, the 12 probabilities in (6) are equal and sum to 1, giving (6).  The same argument gives (6&#039;).&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 2&#039;&#039;&#039;  (Spindle argument) Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z,w \in {\bf C}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|z-w| \geq 1/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Then&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(z) = \mathbf{c}(w) ) \leq \frac{1}{2} \quad (7).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;  Set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;d = |z-w|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  We can find an angle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\theta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;|de^{i\theta}-d|=1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{c}(de^{i\theta}) \neq \mathbf{c}(d)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; almost surely.  This means that at least one of the events &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(d)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(d e^{i\theta})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; occurs with probability at most 1/2.  The claim now follows from isometry invariance (3). &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 3&#039;&#039;&#039;  (Using the K graph) We have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;52 {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}) ) + {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(-z) = \mathbf{c}(z) \hbox{ for } z = 2, 2e^{2\pi i/3}, 2e^{4\pi i/3} ) \geq 1 \quad (8).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Consider the 61-vertex graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;K&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 de Grey&#039;s paper].  It has 26 (isometric) copies of H, and thus 52 copies of the triangle &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1, e^{2\pi i/3}, e^{4\pi i/3})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  With probability at least &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1 - 52 {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}) ) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, none of these triangles are monochromatic.  By the argument in that paper, this implies that the three linking diagonals &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-2, +2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-2 e^{2\pi i/3}, 2e^{2\pi i/3})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-2 e^{4\pi i/3}, e^{-4\pi i/3})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are monochromatic.  This gives the claim. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 4&#039;&#039;&#039;  (Existence of monochromatic &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-triangles) We have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}) ) \geq \frac{1}{104}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; The probability &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(-z) = \mathbf{c}(z) \hbox{ for } z = 2, 2e^{2\pi i/3}, 2e^{4\pi i/3} )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is at most &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(-2) = \mathbf{c}(2))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which by Lemma 2 is at most 1/2.  The claim now follows from Lemma 3.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Computer-verified Claim 5&#039;&#039;&#039;  (Using the graph M)  One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}) ) = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;  (Note this contradicts Corollary 4).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; This simply reflects the fact that there is no 4-coloring of the 1345-vertex graph M from [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 de Grey&#039;s paper] with its central copy of H containing a monochromatic triangle.  One can use other graphs for this purpose, such as the 278-vertex graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \oplus V \oplus H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Computer-verified Claim 6&#039;&#039;&#039;  (Using the graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \oplus V \oplus H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;)  One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(8/3) ) = 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (note this contradicts Lemma 2).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; This reflects the fact that every 4-coloring of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \oplus V \oplus H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; must assign the same color to 0 and 8/3.  There is also a 745-vertex subgraph of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;V \oplus V \oplus H&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with the same property. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 7&#039;&#039;&#039; (Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{40}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;)  We have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;59 {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(\sqrt{11/3}) ) + {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(8/3) ) \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; This reflects the fact that every 4-coloring of the 40-vertex graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{40}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from [https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00157 Exoo-Ismaolescu] in which none of the 59 pairs of vertices at distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{11/3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; apart, will assign the same color to 0 and 8/3.   (This is presumably human-verifiable.) &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 8&#039;&#039;&#039; One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(\sqrt{11/3}) ) \geq \frac{1}{118}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Combine Lemma 7 and Lemma 2.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 9&#039;&#039;&#039; (Using &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{49}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;) One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;18 {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1/3) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}/3) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}/3) )  \geq {\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(0) = \mathbf{c}(\sqrt{11/3}) ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;  This reflects the fact that every 4-coloring of the 49-vertex graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{49}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from [https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00157 Exoo-Ismaolescu] in which 0 and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{11/3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; have the same color, at least one of the 18 copies of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1/3, e^{2\pi i/3}/3, e^{4\pi i/3}/3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is monochromatic.  This is potentially human-verifiable. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 10&#039;&#039;&#039; (Existence of monochromatic &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-triangles) One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1/3) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}/3) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}/3) ) \geq \frac{1}{2124}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Combine Corollary 8 and Lemma 9. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Computer-verified claim 11&#039;&#039;&#039;  One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( \mathbf{c}(1/3) = \mathbf{c}(e^{2\pi i/3}/3) = \mathbf{c}(e^{4\pi i/3}/3) ) = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  (This contradicts Corollary 10).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; This reflects the fact that the 627-vertex graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_{627}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from [https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.00157 Exoo-Ismaolescu] does not have any 4-colorings with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/3, e^{2\pi i/3}/3, e^{4\pi i/3}/3&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; monochromatic. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For certain special distances d, one can improve the bound in Lemma 2:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 12&#039;&#039;&#039; If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a natural number, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;j\in\mathbb{Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\gcd(j,2k+1)=1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; then&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}( 0) = {\mathbf c}( \frac{1}{2 \sin \frac{j\pi}{2k+1}} ) ) \leq \frac{k}{2k+1},&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
thus for instance&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}) ) \leq \frac{1}{3}.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r = \frac{1}{2 \sin \frac{j\pi}{2k+1}}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then observe that the regular 2k+1-polygon &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;r, re^{2\pi i/(2k+1)}, r e^{4\pi i/(2k+1)}, \dots, r^{4k\pi i/(k+1)}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has unit side lengths.  By the pigeonhole principle, we conclude that at most k of these vertices can have the same color as the origin, and the claim follows. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k=2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we also know from the regular pentagon of unit sidelength that &lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \frac{1}{5} \leq {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}( \frac{\sqrt{5}-1}{2}) ) \leq \frac{2}{5}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
since any 4-coloring of that pentagon has either one or two monochromatic diagonals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 13&#039;&#039;&#039; We have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; 7 {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}) ) \geq {\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\sqrt{3}) )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;  Consider the unit rhombus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;0, 1, e^{i\pi/3}, e^{-i\pi/3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; together with the centers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e^{i\pi/6}/\sqrt{3}, e^{-i\pi/6}/\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  With probability &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\sqrt{3}) )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, the two far vertices &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e^{i\pi/3}, e^{-i\pi/3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the same color, and then 0,1 will be two other colors.  This forces either one of the centers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;e^{i\pi/6}/\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of a triangle to have a common color with one of the vertices of that triangle, or the two centers must have the same color.  Thus in any event one of the seven edges of distance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is monochromatic, giving the claim. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 14&#039;&#039;&#039;  We have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}) ) \geq \frac{1}{728}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This slightly improves upon the lower bound of 1/2124 coming from Corollary 10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Combine Corollary 4 and Lemma 13. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 15&#039;&#039;&#039; One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\sqrt{3}) ) + {\bf P} ({\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(2) ) \geq \frac{2}{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\sqrt{3}) ) + {\bf P} ({\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(2) ) \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; As noted in de Grey&#039;s paper, there are essentially four 4-colorings of H.  H has six edges of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and three of length &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  If we let a denote the number of monochromatic &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; edges and b the number of monochromatic &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;-edges, we see from inspection of all four colorings that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(a,b)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is either &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(6, 0), (4,0), (2, 1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  In particular, one always has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{a}{6} + \frac{b}{3} \geq \frac{2}{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;2\frac{a}{6} + \frac{b}{3} \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Taking expectations, we obtain the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 16&#039;&#039;&#039;  We have &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(2) ) \geq \frac{1}{6}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\sqrt{3} ) ) \geq \frac{1}{4} &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}( {\mathbf c}(0) = {\mathbf c}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}) ) \geq \frac{1}{28}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Combine Lemma 2, Lemma 15, and Lemma 13. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 17&#039;&#039;&#039;  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a,b,c &amp;gt; 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are the lengths of a triangle, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0)=\mathbf{c}(a)) + {\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0)=\mathbf{c}(b)) \leq 1 + {\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0)=\mathbf{c}(c))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039; Consider a triangle of side lengths a,b,c.  If the c side is not monochromatic, then at least one of the other two sides must fail to be monochromatic also, thus&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0) \neq \mathbf{c}(a)) + {\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0) \neq \mathbf{c}(b)) \geq {\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0) \neq \mathbf{c}(c))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and the claim follows. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that Lemma 2 follows from the c=1 case of this lemma.  Iterating this lemma starting with Lemma 2 we can also obtain slightly nontrivial upper bounds on &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0)=\mathbf{c}(a))&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for small values of a, e.g. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;{\bf P}(\mathbf{c}(0)=\mathbf{c}(a)) \leq 3/4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; when &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;a \geq 1/4&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10521</id>
		<title>Hadwiger-Nelson problem</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Hadwiger-Nelson_problem&amp;diff=10521"/>
		<updated>2018-04-16T03:29:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Code and data */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Chromatic Number of the Plane (CNP) is the chromatic number of the graph whose vertices are elements of the plane, and two points are connected by an edge if they are a unit distance apart.  The Hadwiger-Nelson problem asks to compute CNP.  The bounds &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;4 \leq CNP \leq 7&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are classical; recently [deG2018] it was shown that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;CNP \geq 5&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  This is achieved by explicitly locating finite unit distance graphs with chromatic number at least 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &#039;&#039;&#039;Polymath16&#039;&#039;&#039; project seeks to simplify the graphs used in [deG2018] to establish this lower bound. More precisely, the goals are&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Goal 1&#039;&#039;&#039;: Find progressively smaller 5-chromatic unit-distance graphs. &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Goal 2&#039;&#039;&#039;: Reduce (ideally to zero) the reliance on computer assistance for the proof. Computer assistance was leveraged in [deG2018] to analyze a subgraph of size 397. &lt;br /&gt;
* &#039;&#039;&#039;Goal 3&#039;&#039;&#039;: Apply these simpler graphs to inform progress in related areas. For example:&lt;br /&gt;
** Find a 6-chromatic unit-distance graph.&lt;br /&gt;
** Improve the corresponding bound in higher dimensions.&lt;br /&gt;
** Improve the current record of 105/29 for the fractional chromatic number of the plane.&lt;br /&gt;
** Find the smallest unit-distance graph of a given minimum degree (excluding, in some natural way, boring cases like Cartesian products of a graph with a hypercube).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Polymath threads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://polymathprojects.org/2018/04/10/polymath-proposal-finding-simpler-unit-distance-graphs-of-chromatic-number-5/ Polymath proposal: finding simpler unit distance graphs of chromatic number 5], Aubrey de Grey, Apr 10 2018.  (&#039;&#039;&#039;Active discussion thread&#039;&#039;&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://dustingmixon.wordpress.com/2018/04/14/polymath16-first-thread-simplifying-de-greys-graph/ Polymath16, first thread: Simplifying de Grey’s graph], Dustin Mixon, Apr 14, 2018.  (&#039;&#039;&#039;Active research thread&#039;&#039;&#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Notable unit distance graphs ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A &#039;&#039;&#039;unit distance graph&#039;&#039;&#039; is a graph that can be realised as a collection of vertices in the plane, with two vertices connected by an edge if they are precisely a unit distance apart.  The chromatic number of any such graph is a lower bound for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;CNP&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;; in particular, if one can find a unit distance graph with no 4-colorings, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;CNP \geq 5&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!Name!!Number of vertices!! Number of edges !! Structure !! Colorings &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindle] &lt;br /&gt;
| 7&lt;br /&gt;
| 11&lt;br /&gt;
| Two 60-120-60-120 rhombi with a common vertex, with one pair of sharp vertices coincident and the other joined&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 3-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/GolombGraph.html Golomb graph] &lt;br /&gt;
| 10&lt;br /&gt;
| 18&lt;br /&gt;
| Contains the center and vertices of a hexagon and equilateral triangle&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 3-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 H]&lt;br /&gt;
| 7&lt;br /&gt;
| 12&lt;br /&gt;
| Vertices and center of a hexagon&lt;br /&gt;
| Has essentially four 4-colorings, two of which contain a monochromatic triangle&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 J]&lt;br /&gt;
| 31&lt;br /&gt;
| 72&lt;br /&gt;
| Contains 13 copies of H &lt;br /&gt;
| Has essentially six 4-colorings in which no H has a monochromatic triangle&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 K]&lt;br /&gt;
| 61&lt;br /&gt;
| 150&lt;br /&gt;
| Contains 2 copies of J&lt;br /&gt;
| In all 4-colorings lacking an H with a monochromatic triangle, all pairs of vertices at distance 4 are monochromatic&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 L]&lt;br /&gt;
| 121&lt;br /&gt;
| 301&lt;br /&gt;
| Contains two copies of K and 52 copies of H&lt;br /&gt;
| All 4-colorings contain an H with a monochromatic triangle&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://dustingmixon.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5-part-ii/ &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
| 97&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Has 40 copies of H&lt;br /&gt;
| All 4-colorings contain an H with a monochromatic triangle&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://polymathprojects.org/2018/04/10/polymath-proposal-finding-simpler-unit-distance-graphs-of-chromatic-number-5/#comment-120295 &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;L_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
| 120&lt;br /&gt;
| 354&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| All 4-colorings contain an H with a monochromatic triangle&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 T]&lt;br /&gt;
| 9&lt;br /&gt;
| 15&lt;br /&gt;
| Contains one Moser spindle and useful symmetry; three vertices form an equilateral triangle&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 U]&lt;br /&gt;
| 15&lt;br /&gt;
| 33&lt;br /&gt;
| Three copies of T at 120-degree rotations&lt;br /&gt;
| &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 V]&lt;br /&gt;
| 31&lt;br /&gt;
| 30&lt;br /&gt;
| Unit vectors at angles consistent with three interlocking Moser spindles&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 W]&lt;br /&gt;
| 301&lt;br /&gt;
| 1230&lt;br /&gt;
| Cartesian product of V with itself, minus vertices at more than &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\sqrt{3}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; from the centre&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 M]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1345&lt;br /&gt;
| 8268&lt;br /&gt;
| Cartesian product of W and H&lt;br /&gt;
| All 4-colorings have a monochromatic triangle in the central copy of H&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://polymathprojects.org/2018/04/10/polymath-proposal-finding-simpler-unit-distance-graphs-of-chromatic-number-5/#comment-120274 &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;M_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
| 278&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Deleting vertices from M while maintaining its restriction on H&lt;br /&gt;
| All 4-colorings have a monochromatic triangle in the central copy of H&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 N]&lt;br /&gt;
| 20425&lt;br /&gt;
| 151311&lt;br /&gt;
| Contains 52 copies of M arranged around the H-copies of L&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 4-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://dustingmixon.wordpress.com/2018/04/10/the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5/ &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1585&lt;br /&gt;
| 7909&lt;br /&gt;
| N &amp;quot;shrunk&amp;quot; by stepwise deletions and replacements of vertices&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 4-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 G]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1581&lt;br /&gt;
| 7877&lt;br /&gt;
| Deleting 4 vertices from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 4-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://dustingmixon.wordpress.com/2018/04/10/the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5/ &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
| 1577&lt;br /&gt;
|&lt;br /&gt;
| Deleting 8 vertices from &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 4-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| [https://polymathprojects.org/2018/04/10/polymath-proposal-finding-simpler-unit-distance-graphs-of-chromatic-number-5/#comment-120318 &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
| 874&lt;br /&gt;
| 4461&lt;br /&gt;
| Juxtaposing two copies of M and shrinking&lt;br /&gt;
| Not 4-colorable&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Further questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IndependenceRatio.html independence ratios] of the above unit distance graphs?&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_coloring fractional chromatic numbers] of these graphs?&lt;br /&gt;
* What are the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lov%C3%A1sz_number Lovasz numbers] of these graphs?&lt;br /&gt;
* What about the Erdos unit distance graph (&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; vertices, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n^{1+c/\log\log n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; edges)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Blog posts and other online forums ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://mathoverflow.net/questions/236392/has-there-been-a-computer-search-for-a-5-chromatic-unit-distance-graph Has there been a computer search for a 5-chromatic unit distance graph?], Juno, Apr 16, 2016.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2018/04/09/the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5/ The chromatic number of the plane is at least 5], Jordan Ellenberg, Apr 9 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2018/04/10/aubrey-de-grey-the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5/ Aubrey de Grey: The chromatic number of the plane is at least 5], Gil Kalai, Apr 10 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://dustingmixon.wordpress.com/2018/04/10/the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5/ The chromatic number of the plane is at least 5], Dustin Mixon, Apr 10, 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3697 Amazing progress on long-standing problems], Scott Aaronson, Apr 11 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://dustingmixon.wordpress.com/2018/04/13/the-chromatic-number-of-the-plane-is-at-least-5-part-ii/ The chromatic number of the plane is at least 5, Part II], Dustin Mixon, Apr 13 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Code and data ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ufknm1v9gtbhad3/AACB2xwaXYx5EGda38_L-0foa?dl=0 This dropbox folder] will contain most of the data and images for the project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some specific files:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/x6kvu7b3wvdvqsn/graph.dimacs?dl=0 The 1585-vertex graph in DIMACS format]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/qk3gbpjvvsjfsc3/sat.dimacs?dl=0 A naive translation of 4-colorability of this graph into a SAT problem in DIMACS format]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/nipqikfzcfn9o5a/vertices.sage?dl=0 The vertices of this graph in explicit Sage notation]&lt;br /&gt;
* The graph &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G_2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;: [http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~marijn/CNP/874.vtx vertices (Mathematica)] [http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~marijn/CNP/874.edge edges (DIMACS)]&lt;br /&gt;
* The [https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ufknm1v9gtbhad3/AADfw9WO1ol2ayQNJEtGf8oBa/Graphs?dl=0 densest unit-distance graphs] on an &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n\times n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; grid for &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n=10,20,\ldots,100&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (DIMACS format).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Code:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.dropbox.com/s/6u1jctbjy38t383/lovaszmoser.m?dl=0 MATLAB script for computing Lovasz number]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Software:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://cvxr.com/cvx/ CVX]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.labri.fr/perso/lsimon/glucose/ Glucose 4.0]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://minisat.se/ Minisat]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Wikipedia ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph_coloring#Chromatic_number Chromatic number]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Bruijn%E2%80%93Erd%C5%91s_theorem_(graph_theory) de Bruijn-Erdos theorem]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadwiger%E2%80%93Nelson_problem Hadwiger-Nelson problem]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lov%C3%A1sz_number Lovasz number]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moser_spindle Moser spindle]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bibliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [CR2015] D. Cranston, L. Rabern, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1501.01647 The fractional chromatic number of the plane], arXiv:1501.01647&lt;br /&gt;
* [deBE1951] N. G. de Bruijn, P. Erdős, [http://www.math-inst.hu/~p_erdos/1951-01.pdf A colour problem for infinite graphs and a problem in the theory of relations], Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A, 54 (1951): 371–373, MR 0046630.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [deG2018] A. de Grey, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.02385 The chromatic number of the plane is  at least 5], arXiv:1804.02385&lt;br /&gt;
* [H1945] H. Hadwiger, Uberdeckung des euklidischen Raum durch kongruente Mengen, Portugaliae Math. 4 (1945), 238–242.&lt;br /&gt;
* [MM1961] L. Moser and M. Moser, Solution to Problem 10, Can. Math. Bull. 4 (1961), 187–189.&lt;br /&gt;
* [P1998] D. Pritikin, All unit-distance graphs of order 6197 are 6-colorable, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 73.2 (1998): 159-163.&lt;br /&gt;
* [S2008] A. Soifer, The Mathematical Coloring Book, Springer, 2008, ISBN-13: 978-0387746401.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm&amp;diff=10051</id>
		<title>Linear norm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm&amp;diff=10051"/>
		<updated>2018-01-20T02:29:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Writeup */ hyperlink for the journal; https for the arXiv&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the wiki page for understanding &#039;&#039;seminorms of linear growth&#039;&#039; on a group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (such as the free group on two generators).  These are functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| \|: G \to [0,+\infty)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; that obey the triangle inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|xy\| \leq \|x\| + \|y\| \quad (1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and the linear growth condition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x^n \| = |n| \|x\| \quad (2) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \in {\bf Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the usual group theory notations &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^y := yxy^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y] := xyx^{-1}y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
== Threads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/16/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group/ Bi-invariant metrics of linear growth on the free group], Dec 16 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/19/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group-ii/ Bi-invariant metrics of linear growth on the free group, II], Dec 19 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/21/metrics-of-linear-growth-the-solution/ Metrics of linear growth – the solution], Dec 21 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/01/11/homogeneous-length-functions-on-groups/ Homogeneous length functions on groups], Jan 11 2018.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key lemmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henceforth we assume we have a seminorm &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of linear growth.  The letters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s,t,x,y,z,w&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are always understood to be in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i,j,n,m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are always understood to be integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From (2) we of course have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x^{-1} \| = \| x\| \quad (3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039;. If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| = \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  By hypothesis, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x = zyz^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^n = z y^n z^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by the triangle inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; n \|x\| = \|x^n \| \leq \|z\| + n \|y\| + \|z^{-1} \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and taking limits we conclude that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| \leq \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Similarly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|y\| \leq \|x\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving the claim. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An equivalent form of the lemma is that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|xy\| = \|yx\| \quad (4).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can generalise Lemma 1:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 2&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;wy&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;zw^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x\| \leq \frac{1}{|i+j|} ( \|w\| + \|z\| )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  By hypothesis, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^i = s wy s^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^j = t zw^{-1} t^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s,t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  For any natural number &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we then have&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x^{in} x^{jn} = s wy \dots wy s^{-1} t zw^{-1} \dots zw^{-1} t^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the terms &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;wy, zw&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are each repeated &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; times.  By Lemma 1, conjugation by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;w&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; does not change the norm.  From many applications of this and the triangle inequality, we conclude that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |i+j| n \|x\| = \| x^{in} x^{jn} \| \leq \|s\| + n \|y\| + \|s^{-1} t\| + n \|z\| + \|t^{-1}\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and sending &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \to \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we obtain the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corollaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 0&#039;&#039;&#039;.  The eight commutators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x^{\pm 1}, y^{\pm 1}], [y^{\pm 1}, x^{\pm 1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; all have the same norm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Each of these commutators is conjugate to either &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or its inverse. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.  The function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \mapsto \|x^n y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is convex in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^n y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x (x^{n-1} y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^{n+1} y) x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| x^n y \| \leq \frac{1}{2} (\| x^{n-1} y \| + \| x^{n+1} y \|),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 2&#039;&#039;&#039;. For any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{2k+2} (\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1} \| + \| [x,y]^k x \|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thus for instance&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{4} (\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}] x^{-1} \| + \| [x,y] x \|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]^{k+1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(y[x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1}y^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1} [x,y]^k xy)x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{2k+2} ( \| y[x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1} \| + \| (y^{-1} [x,y]^k xy)x^{-1}\|)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 3&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]^2 x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x y^{-1} [x,y] \| +  \| xy [x,y] \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]^2 x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y (x^{-1} y^{-1} [x,y] x^2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x[x,y]xyx^{-1}) y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \displaystyle \|[x,y]^2 x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \|x^{-1} y^{-1} [x,y] x^2\| + \|x[x,y]xyx^{-1}\|)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 4&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x^2 y [x,y] \| + \| xy^{-1} x [x,y] \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;([x,y] x)^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y^{-1} (x [x,y] x^2 y x^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^{-1} y^{-1} x [x,y] x^2) y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x [x,y] x^2 y x^{-1} \| + \| x^{-1} y^{-1} x [x,y] x^2 \| ),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 5&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y] x\| \leq \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} \| [x^2, y] \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x [x^{-2},y^{-1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1} x^2 y) x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| [x^{-2}, y^{-1}] \| + \| y^{-1} x^2 y \| ),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1 and Corollary 0. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 6&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y]\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x\| + \| [x^2,y] \| + \| [x,y] x\| ) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  From Lemma 2 we have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x^{-1} [x,y]^2 \| + \| [x,y] x \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^{-1} [x,y]^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(yx^{-1} y^{-1}) (xyx^{-2} y^{-1} x)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| x^{-1} [x,y]^2 \| \leq \| yx^{-1} y^{-1} \| + \|xyx^{-2} y^{-1} x\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and the claim follows from Lemma 1 and (3).   &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.  For any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m,k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| x^m [x,y]^k \| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1} [x,y]^k \| + \|x^{m+1} [x,y]^{k-1} \| )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^m[x,y]^k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is trivially conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(x^{m-1}[x,y]^k)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1}x^m[x,y]^{k-1}xy)x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Hence by Lemma 2,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| x^m[x,y]^k \| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1}[x,y]^k \| + \| y^{-1}x^m[x,y]^{k-1}xy \| ) = \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1}[x,y]^k \| + \| x^{m+1}[x,y]^{k-1} \|),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where the final equation is by conjugation invariance (Lemma 1). &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 8&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| \leq \| [x,y] x \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (x^2 y x y^{-1} x^{-2}) (x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1} x^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1} x^{-1})^{-1} (x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^2 y x y^{-1} x^{-2} \| + \|x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1}\| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Lemma 1, the RHS is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2} \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} \| [x,y] x \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the claim follows.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Iterations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Call a pair of real numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;admissible&#039;&#039;&#039; if one has the inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \alpha \|x\| + \beta \|y \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Clearly the set of admissible pairs is closed and convex, and if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha&#039;,\beta&#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&#039; \geq \alpha, \beta&#039; \geq \beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  From Corollary 0 we also see that the set is symmetric: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible if and only if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\beta,\alpha)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y] = y^x y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, and similarly so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proposition 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{\beta}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  From Corollary 5 and hypothesis one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} ( \alpha \|x^2\| + \beta \|y\| ) = (\alpha+1) \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{2} \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and hence also&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}] x^{-1}\| \leq (\alpha+1) \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{2} \|y\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From Corollary 2 we thus have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y]\| \leq \frac{\alpha+1}{2} \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{4} \|y\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto (\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{\beta}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a contraction with fixed point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]\| \leq \|x\| \quad (4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From symmetry we also see that if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{\beta+1}{2}, \frac{\alpha}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  The map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto (\frac{\beta+1}{2}, \frac{\alpha}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a contraction with fixed point (4/7,1/7), thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]\| \leq \frac{4}{7} \|x\| + \frac{1}{7} \|y\| &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Note: this argument only requires Lemma 1, Lemma 2, and Corollary 7 from the preceding sections.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Theorem 1&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|[x,y]\| = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be a large natural number.  Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(m,k) := \| x^m [x,y]^k \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;X_1,\dots,X_{2n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be iid random variables, each taking a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-1,0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with equal probability &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  From Corollary 7 one has&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(m,k) \leq {\bf E} f( (m,k) + X_j)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(m,k), j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and in particular on iterating&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(0, n) \leq {\bf E} f( (0,n) + X_1 + \dots + X_{2n} ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the triangle inequality, we conclude that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(0, n) \leq (\|x\|+\|y\|) {\bf E} | (0,n) + X_1 + \dots + X_{2n} |.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the random variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,n) + X_1 + \dots + X_{2n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has mean zero and variance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O(n)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Cauchy-Schwarz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(0, n) \ll n^{1/2} (\|x\|+\|y\|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the left-hand side is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \|[x,y]\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so on dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and taking limits we obtain the claim.&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence of this theorem and the triangle inequality, any seminorm on a group will factor through to its abelianisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writeup ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Files for the writeup may be found in [https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wg4y7ptahwq3xo1/AABreDLrXH3hniz1jiFTtvska?dl=0 this directory]. &lt;br /&gt;
* The arXiv preprint may be found [https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.03908 here].&lt;br /&gt;
* The paper has been submitted to [https://msp.org/ant/about/cover/cover.html Algebra &amp;amp; Number Theory]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the [[linear norm grant acknowledgments]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Polymath14&amp;diff=10047</id>
		<title>Polymath14</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Polymath14&amp;diff=10047"/>
		<updated>2018-01-12T04:01:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: redirect to the page for the project&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT [[Linear norm]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Intransitive_dice&amp;diff=10046</id>
		<title>Intransitive dice</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Intransitive_dice&amp;diff=10046"/>
		<updated>2018-01-12T03:42:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: Adding thread 7&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Gowers&#039; project on intransitive dice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Threads: &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/04/28/a-potential-new-polymath-project-intransitive-dice/ A potential new polymath project: intransitive dice], Timothy Gowers, Apr 28, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/05/12/intransitive-dice-ii/ Intransitive dice II], Timothy Gowers, May 12, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/05/19/intransitive-dice-iii/ Intransitive dice III], Timothy Gowers, May 19, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/05/27/intransitive-dice-iv-first-problem-more-or-less-solved/ Intransitive dice IV: first problem more or less solved], Timothy Gowers, May 27, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/05/30/intransitive-dice-v-we-want-a-local-central-limit-theorem/ Intransitive dice V: we want a central limit theorem], Timothy Gowers, May 30, 2017. &lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/07/25/intransitive-dice-vi-sketch-proof-of-the-main-conjecture-for-the-balanced-sequences-model/ Intransitive dice VI: Sketch proof of the main conjecture for the balanced sequences model], Timothy Gowers, July 27, 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://gowers.wordpress.com/2017/08/12/intransitive-dice-vii-aiming-for-further-results/ Intransitive dice VII — aiming for further results], Timothy Gowers, August 12, 2017.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm&amp;diff=10042</id>
		<title>Linear norm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm&amp;diff=10042"/>
		<updated>2018-01-11T19:27:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Threads */ replace URL with page title&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the wiki page for understanding &#039;&#039;seminorms of linear growth&#039;&#039; on a group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (such as the free group on two generators).  These are functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| \|: G \to [0,+\infty)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; that obey the triangle inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|xy\| \leq \|x\| + \|y\| \quad (1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and the linear growth condition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x^n \| = |n| \|x\| \quad (2) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \in {\bf Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the usual group theory notations &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^y := yxy^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y] := xyx^{-1}y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
== Threads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/16/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group/ Bi-invariant metrics of linear growth on the free group], Dec 16 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/19/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group-ii/ Bi-invariant metrics of linear growth on the free group, II], Dec 19 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/21/metrics-of-linear-growth-the-solution/ Metrics of linear growth – the solution], Dec 21 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key lemmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henceforth we assume we have a seminorm &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of linear growth.  The letters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s,t,x,y,z,w&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are always understood to be in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i,j,n,m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are always understood to be integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From (2) we of course have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x^{-1} \| = \| x\| \quad (3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039;. If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| = \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  By hypothesis, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x = zyz^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^n = z y^n z^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by the triangle inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; n \|x\| = \|x^n \| \leq \|z\| + n \|y\| + \|z^{-1} \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and taking limits we conclude that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| \leq \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Similarly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|y\| \leq \|x\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving the claim. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An equivalent form of the lemma is that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|xy\| = \|yx\| \quad (4).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can generalise Lemma 1:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 2&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;wy&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;zw^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x\| \leq \frac{1}{|i+j|} ( \|w\| + \|z\| )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  By hypothesis, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^i = s wy s^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^j = t zw^{-1} t^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s,t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  For any natural number &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we then have&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x^{in} x^{jn} = s wy \dots wy s^{-1} t zw^{-1} \dots zw^{-1} t^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the terms &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;wy, zw&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are each repeated &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; times.  By Lemma 1, conjugation by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;w&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; does not change the norm.  From many applications of this and the triangle inequality, we conclude that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |i+j| n \|x\| = \| x^{in} x^{jn} \| \leq \|s\| + n \|y\| + \|s^{-1} t\| + n \|z\| + \|t^{-1}\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and sending &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \to \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we obtain the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corollaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 0&#039;&#039;&#039;.  The eight commutators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x^{\pm 1}, y^{\pm 1}], [y^{\pm 1}, x^{\pm 1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; all have the same norm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Each of these commutators is conjugate to either &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or its inverse. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.  The function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \mapsto \|x^n y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is convex in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^n y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x (x^{n-1} y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^{n+1} y) x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| x^n y \| \leq \frac{1}{2} (\| x^{n-1} y \| + \| x^{n+1} y \|),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 2&#039;&#039;&#039;. For any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{2k+2} (\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1} \| + \| [x,y]^k x \|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thus for instance&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{4} (\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}] x^{-1} \| + \| [x,y] x \|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]^{k+1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(y[x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1}y^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1} [x,y]^k xy)x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{2k+2} ( \| y[x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1} \| + \| (y^{-1} [x,y]^k xy)x^{-1}\|)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 3&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]^2 x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x y^{-1} [x,y] \| +  \| xy [x,y] \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]^2 x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y (x^{-1} y^{-1} [x,y] x^2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x[x,y]xyx^{-1}) y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \displaystyle \|[x,y]^2 x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \|x^{-1} y^{-1} [x,y] x^2\| + \|x[x,y]xyx^{-1}\|)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 4&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x^2 y [x,y] \| + \| xy^{-1} x [x,y] \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;([x,y] x)^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y^{-1} (x [x,y] x^2 y x^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^{-1} y^{-1} x [x,y] x^2) y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x [x,y] x^2 y x^{-1} \| + \| x^{-1} y^{-1} x [x,y] x^2 \| ),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 5&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y] x\| \leq \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} \| [x^2, y] \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x [x^{-2},y^{-1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1} x^2 y) x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| [x^{-2}, y^{-1}] \| + \| y^{-1} x^2 y \| ),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1 and Corollary 0. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 6&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y]\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x\| + \| [x^2,y] \| + \| [x,y] x\| ) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  From Lemma 2 we have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x^{-1} [x,y]^2 \| + \| [x,y] x \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^{-1} [x,y]^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(yx^{-1} y^{-1}) (xyx^{-2} y^{-1} x)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| x^{-1} [x,y]^2 \| \leq \| yx^{-1} y^{-1} \| + \|xyx^{-2} y^{-1} x\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and the claim follows from Lemma 1 and (3).   &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.  For any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m,k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| x^m [x,y]^k \| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1} [x,y]^k \| + \|x^{m+1} [x,y]^{k-1} \| )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^m[x,y]^k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is trivially conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(x^{m-1}[x,y]^k)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1}x^m[x,y]^{k-1}xy)x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Hence by Lemma 2,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| x^m[x,y]^k \| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1}[x,y]^k \| + \| y^{-1}x^m[x,y]^{k-1}xy \| ) = \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1}[x,y]^k \| + \| x^{m+1}[x,y]^{k-1} \|),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where the final equation is by conjugation invariance (Lemma 1). &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 8&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| \leq \| [x,y] x \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (x^2 y x y^{-1} x^{-2}) (x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1} x^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1} x^{-1})^{-1} (x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^2 y x y^{-1} x^{-2} \| + \|x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1}\| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Lemma 1, the RHS is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2} \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} \| [x,y] x \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the claim follows.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Iterations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Call a pair of real numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;admissible&#039;&#039;&#039; if one has the inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \alpha \|x\| + \beta \|y \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Clearly the set of admissible pairs is closed and convex, and if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha&#039;,\beta&#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&#039; \geq \alpha, \beta&#039; \geq \beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  From Corollary 0 we also see that the set is symmetric: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible if and only if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\beta,\alpha)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y] = y^x y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, and similarly so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proposition 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{\beta}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  From Corollary 5 and hypothesis one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} ( \alpha \|x^2\| + \beta \|y\| ) = (\alpha+1) \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{2} \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and hence also&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}] x^{-1}\| \leq (\alpha+1) \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{2} \|y\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From Corollary 2 we thus have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y]\| \leq \frac{\alpha+1}{2} \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{4} \|y\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto (\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{\beta}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a contraction with fixed point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]\| \leq \|x\| \quad (4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From symmetry we also see that if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{\beta+1}{2}, \frac{\alpha}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  The map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto (\frac{\beta+1}{2}, \frac{\alpha}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a contraction with fixed point (4/7,1/7), thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]\| \leq \frac{4}{7} \|x\| + \frac{1}{7} \|y\| &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Solution ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;Note: this argument only requires Lemma 1, Lemma 2, and Corollary 7 from the preceding sections.&#039;&#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Theorem 1&#039;&#039;&#039; &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|[x,y]\| = 0&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be a large natural number.  Write &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(m,k) := \| x^m [x,y]^k \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Let &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;X_1,\dots,X_{2n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; be iid random variables, each taking a value of &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(-1,0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,-1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; with equal probability &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;1/2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  From Corollary 7 one has&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(m,k) \leq {\bf E} f( (m,k) + X_j)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(m,k), j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and in particular on iterating&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(0, n) \leq {\bf E} f( (0,n) + X_1 + \dots + X_{2n} ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By the triangle inequality, we conclude that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(0, n) \leq (\|x\|+\|y\|) {\bf E} | (0,n) + X_1 + \dots + X_{2n} |.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the random variable &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,n) + X_1 + \dots + X_{2n}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; has mean zero and variance &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O(n)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Cauchy-Schwarz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;f(0, n) \ll n^{1/2} (\|x\|+\|y\|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But the left-hand side is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \|[x,y]\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, so on dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and taking limits we obtain the claim.&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a consequence of this theorem and the triangle inequality, any seminorm on a group will factor through to its abelianisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Writeup ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Files for the writeup may be found in [https://www.dropbox.com/sh/wg4y7ptahwq3xo1/AABreDLrXH3hniz1jiFTtvska?dl=0 this directory]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here are the [[linear norm grant acknowledgments]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm_grant_acknowledgments&amp;diff=10029</id>
		<title>Linear norm grant acknowledgments</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm_grant_acknowledgments&amp;diff=10029"/>
		<updated>2017-12-22T22:52:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: /* Participants and contact information */  add myself&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Participants should be arranged in alphabetical order of surname.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Participants and contact information ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Caution: this list may be incomplete.  Participants who have made significant contributions to the project (on par with a co-author on a traditional mathematical research paper) should add themselves to this list, or email tao@math.ucla.edu if they are unable to do so directly.  Participants who have made auxiliary contributions to the project (on par with those mentioned in an Acknowledgments section in a traditional paper) should add themselves instead to the list at the bottom of the page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lior Silberman, UBC, [https://www.math.ubc.ca/~lior/]&lt;br /&gt;
* Terence Tao, UCLA, [http://www.math.ucla.edu/~tao]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Grant information ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lior Silberman was supported by an NSERC Discovery grant. &lt;br /&gt;
* Terence Tao was supported by a Simons Investigator grant, the James and Carol Collins Chair, the Mathematical Analysis &amp;amp; Application Research Fund Endowment, and by NSF grant DMS-1266164. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Other acknowledgments ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other contributors to the project include ....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks to Michael Nielsen for hosting the polymath wiki for this project.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=User:Lior&amp;diff=10019</id>
		<title>User:Lior</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=User:Lior&amp;diff=10019"/>
		<updated>2017-12-21T22:06:40Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: Initial page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Working on:&lt;br /&gt;
# the [[The_hot_spots_conjecture|Hot spots]] project.&lt;br /&gt;
# the [[Linear_norm|Linear norms]] project.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://www.math.ubc.ca/~lior/ Lior Silberman]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm&amp;diff=10018</id>
		<title>Linear norm</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Linear_norm&amp;diff=10018"/>
		<updated>2017-12-21T21:50:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Lior: missing markup tag&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This is the wiki page for understanding &#039;&#039;seminorms of linear growth&#039;&#039; on a group &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (such as the free group on two generators).  These are functions &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| \|: G \to [0,+\infty)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; that obey the triangle inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|xy\| \leq \|x\| + \|y\| \quad (1)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and the linear growth condition&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x^n \| = |n| \|x\| \quad (2) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y \in G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \in {\bf Z}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We use the usual group theory notations &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^y := yxy^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y] := xyx^{-1}y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
== Threads ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/16/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group/ https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/16/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group/], Dec 16 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2017/12/19/bi-invariant-metrics-of-linear-growth-on-the-free-group-ii/ Bi-invariant metrics of linear growth on the free group, II], Dec 19 2017.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Key lemmas ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Henceforth we assume we have a seminorm &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of linear growth.  The letters &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s,t,x,y,z,w&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are always understood to be in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;i,j,n,m&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are always understood to be integers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From (2) we of course have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x^{-1} \| = \| x\| \quad (3)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 1&#039;&#039;&#039;. If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| = \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  By hypothesis, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x = zyz^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;z&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, thus &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^n = z y^n z^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by the triangle inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; n \|x\| = \|x^n \| \leq \|z\| + n \|y\| + \|z^{-1} \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and taking limits we conclude that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| \leq \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Similarly &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|y\| \leq \|x\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, giving the claim. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An equivalent form of the lemma is that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|xy\| = \|yx\| \quad (4).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can generalise Lemma 1:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Lemma 2&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^i&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;wy&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^j&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;zw^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, then &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x\| \leq \frac{1}{|i+j|} ( \|w\| + \|z\| )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  By hypothesis, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^i = s wy s^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^j = t zw^{-1} t^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for some &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;s,t&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  For any natural number &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we then have&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; x^{in} x^{jn} = s wy \dots wy s^{-1} t zw^{-1} \dots zw^{-1} t^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
where the terms &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;wy, zw&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; are each repeated &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; times.  By Lemma 1, conjugation by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;w&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; does not change the norm.  From many applications of this and the triangle inequality, we conclude that&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; |i+j| n \|x\| = \| x^{in} x^{jn} \| \leq \|s\| + n \|y\| + \|s^{-1} t\| + n \|z\| + \|t^{-1}\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dividing by &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and sending &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \to \infty&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we obtain the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Corollaries ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 0&#039;&#039;&#039;.  The eight commutators &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x^{\pm 1}, y^{\pm 1}], [y^{\pm 1}, x^{\pm 1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; all have the same norm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  Each of these commutators is conjugate to either &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or its inverse. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.  The function &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n \mapsto \|x^n y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is convex in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^n y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x (x^{n-1} y)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^{n+1} y) x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| x^n y \| \leq \frac{1}{2} (\| x^{n-1} y \| + \| x^{n+1} y \|),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 2&#039;&#039;&#039;. For any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;k \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{2k+2} (\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1} \| + \| [x,y]^k x \|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Thus for instance&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{4} (\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}] x^{-1} \| + \| [x,y] x \|).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]^{k+1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(y[x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1}y^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1} [x,y]^k xy)x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{2k+2} ( \| y[x^{-1},y^{-1}]^k x^{-1} \| + \| (y^{-1} [x,y]^k xy)x^{-1}\|)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 3&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]^2 x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x y^{-1} [x,y] \| +  \| xy [x,y] \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]^2 x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y (x^{-1} y^{-1} [x,y] x^2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x[x,y]xyx^{-1}) y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \displaystyle \|[x,y]^2 x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \|x^{-1} y^{-1} [x,y] x^2\| + \|x[x,y]xyx^{-1}\|)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 4&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x^2 y [x,y] \| + \| xy^{-1} x [x,y] \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;([x,y] x)^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate both to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;y^{-1} (x [x,y] x^2 y x^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^{-1} y^{-1} x [x,y] x^2) y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x [x,y] x^2 y x^{-1} \| + \| x^{-1} y^{-1} x [x,y] x^2 \| ),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 5&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y] x\| \leq \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} \| [x^2, y] \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y]x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x [x^{-2},y^{-1}]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1} x^2 y) x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| [x^{-2}, y^{-1}] \| + \| y^{-1} x^2 y \| ),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
giving the claim by Lemma 1 and Corollary 0. &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 6&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y]\| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x\| + \| [x^2,y] \| + \| [x,y] x\| ) &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  From Lemma 2 we have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \frac{1}{4} ( \| x^{-1} [x,y]^2 \| + \| [x,y] x \| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Since &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^{-1} [x,y]^2&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(yx^{-1} y^{-1}) (xyx^{-2} y^{-1} x)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, we have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| x^{-1} [x,y]^2 \| \leq \| yx^{-1} y^{-1} \| fis + \|xyx^{-2} y^{-1} x\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and the claim follows from Lemma 1 and (3).   &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 7&#039;&#039;&#039;.  For any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;m,k \geq 1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| x^m [x,y]^k \| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1} [x,y]^k \| + \|x^{m+1} [x,y]^{k-1} \| )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x^m[x,y]^k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is trivially conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x(x^{m-1}[x,y]^k)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and conjugate to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(y^{-1}x^m[x,y]^{k-1}xy)x^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;. Hence by Lemma 2,&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| x^m[x,y]^k \| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1}[x,y]^k \| + \| y^{-1}x^m[x,y]^{k-1}xy \| ) = \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^{m-1}[x,y]^k \| + \| x^{m+1}[x,y]^{k-1} \|),&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
where the final equation is by conjugation invariance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Corollary 8&#039;&#039;&#039;.  One has &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\|x\| \leq \| [x,y] x \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is equal to both &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; (x^2 y x y^{-1} x^{-2}) (x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1} x^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and to &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1} x^{-1})^{-1} (x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, hence by Lemma 2&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|x\| \leq \frac{1}{2} ( \| x^2 y x y^{-1} x^{-2} \| + \|x^2 y x^{-1} y^{-1}\| ).&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
By Lemma 1, the RHS is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\frac{1}{2} \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} \| [x,y] x \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, and the claim follows.  &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\Box&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Iterations ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Call a pair of real numbers &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; &#039;&#039;&#039;admissible&#039;&#039;&#039; if one has the inequality&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \| [x,y] \| \leq \alpha \|x\| + \beta \|y \|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for all &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;x,y&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Clearly the set of admissible pairs is closed and convex, and if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha&#039;,\beta&#039;)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; for any &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\alpha&#039; \geq \alpha, \beta&#039; \geq \beta&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  From Corollary 0 we also see that the set is symmetric: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible if and only if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\beta,\alpha)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Writing &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[x,y] = y^x y^{-1}&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; we see that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, and similarly so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(0,2)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proposition 1&#039;&#039;&#039;.  If &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{\beta}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&#039;&#039;&#039;Proof&#039;&#039;&#039;.  From Corollary 5 and hypothesis one has&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y] x\| \leq \|x\| + \frac{1}{2} ( \alpha \|x^2\| + \beta \|y\| ) = (\alpha+1) \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{2} \|y\|&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
and hence also&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x^{-1},y^{-1}] x^{-1}\| \leq (\alpha+1) \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{2} \|y\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From Corollary 2 we thus have&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\| [x,y]\| \leq \frac{\alpha+1}{2} \|x\| + \frac{\beta}{4} \|y\|.&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto (\frac{\alpha+1}{2}, \frac{\beta}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a contraction with fixed point &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(1,0)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  Thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]\| \leq \|x\| \quad (4)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From symmetry we also see that if &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is admissible, then so is &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\frac{\beta+1}{2}, \frac{\alpha}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  The map &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;(\alpha,\beta) \mapsto (\frac{\beta+1}{2}, \frac{\alpha}{4})&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; is a contraction with fixed point (4/7,1/7), thus&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:&amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \|[x,y]\| \leq \frac{4}{7} \|x\| + \frac{1}{7} \|y\| &amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Lior</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>