ABC conjecture - Revision history

Mabcp: /* News Media */

2016-11-05T14:44:35Z

News Media

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:44, 5 November 2016
Line 144:		Line 144:
	*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509 The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof], Davide Castelvecchi, 07 October 2015, Nature News		*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509 The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof], Davide Castelvecchi, 07 October 2015, Nature News
	*[http://www.nature.com/news/biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-in-limbo-after-cryptic-meeting-1.19035 Biggest mystery in mathematics in limbo after cryptic meeting], Davide Castelvecchi, 16 December 2015, Nature News		*[http://www.nature.com/news/biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-in-limbo-after-cryptic-meeting-1.19035 Biggest mystery in mathematics in limbo after cryptic meeting], Davide Castelvecchi, 16 December 2015, Nature News
			*[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28682-mathematicians-left-baffled-after-three-year-struggle-over-proof/ Mathematicians left baffled after three-year struggle over proof], New Scientist, 16 December 2015
	*[https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151221-hope-rekindled-for-abc-proof/ Hope Rekindled for Perplexing Proof], Quanta Magazine, Kevin Hartnett, December 21, 2015		*[https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151221-hope-rekindled-for-abc-proof/ Hope Rekindled for Perplexing Proof], Quanta Magazine, Kevin Hartnett, December 21, 2015
	*[http://www.nature.com/news/monumental-proof-to-torment-mathematicians-for-years-to-come-1.20342 Monumental proof to torment mathematicians for years to come], 28 July 2016, Nature News		*[http://www.nature.com/news/monumental-proof-to-torment-mathematicians-for-years-to-come-1.20342 Monumental proof to torment mathematicians for years to come], 28 July 2016, Nature News

Mabcp: /* Blogs */

2016-11-05T14:30:24Z

Blogs

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:30, 5 November 2016
Line 102:		Line 102:
	*[https://plus.google.com/+AlexanderKruel/posts/dvUQWL7tDg2 Alexander Kruel Google+], 8 Sept 2015		*[https://plus.google.com/+AlexanderKruel/posts/dvUQWL7tDg2 Alexander Kruel Google+], 8 Sept 2015
	*[https://plus.google.com/+DavidRoberts/posts/UMKqSdvf2WB David Roberts Google+], 8 Sept 2015		*[https://plus.google.com/+DavidRoberts/posts/UMKqSdvf2WB David Roberts Google+], 8 Sept 2015
			*[https://mathbabe.org/2015/12/15/notes-on-the-oxford-iut-workshop-by-brian-conrad/ Notes on the Oxford IUT workshop by Brian Conrad], Mathbabe, 15 Dec 2015

	===2013 study of Geometry of Frobenioids===		===2013 study of Geometry of Frobenioids===

Mabcp: /* News Media */

2016-11-05T14:28:05Z

News Media

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 5 November 2016
Line 142:		Line 142:
	*[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28065-our-numbers-up-machines-will-do-maths-well-never-understand/ Our number’s up: Machines will do maths we’ll never understand], New Scientist, 26 August 2015		*[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28065-our-numbers-up-machines-will-do-maths-well-never-understand/ Our number’s up: Machines will do maths we’ll never understand], New Scientist, 26 August 2015
	*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509 The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof], Davide Castelvecchi, 07 October 2015, Nature News		*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509 The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof], Davide Castelvecchi, 07 October 2015, Nature News
			*[http://www.nature.com/news/biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-in-limbo-after-cryptic-meeting-1.19035 Biggest mystery in mathematics in limbo after cryptic meeting], Davide Castelvecchi, 16 December 2015, Nature News
	*[https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151221-hope-rekindled-for-abc-proof/ Hope Rekindled for Perplexing Proof], Quanta Magazine, Kevin Hartnett, December 21, 2015		*[https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151221-hope-rekindled-for-abc-proof/ Hope Rekindled for Perplexing Proof], Quanta Magazine, Kevin Hartnett, December 21, 2015
	*[http://www.nature.com/news/monumental-proof-to-torment-mathematicians-for-years-to-come-1.20342 Monumental proof to torment mathematicians for years to come], 28 July 2016, Nature News		*[http://www.nature.com/news/monumental-proof-to-torment-mathematicians-for-years-to-come-1.20342 Monumental proof to torment mathematicians for years to come], 28 July 2016, Nature News

Mabcp: /* Papers */

2016-11-05T14:14:58Z

Papers

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:14, 5 November 2016
Line 19:		Line 19:
	# (IUTT-III) [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory%20III.pdf Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory III: Canonical Splittings of the Log-theta-lattice], Shinichi Mochizuki		# (IUTT-III) [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory%20III.pdf Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory III: Canonical Splittings of the Log-theta-lattice], Shinichi Mochizuki
	# (IUTT-IV) [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory%20IV.pdf Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory IV: Log-volume Computations and Set-theoretic Foundations], Shinichi Mochizuki		# (IUTT-IV) [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory%20IV.pdf Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory IV: Log-volume Computations and Set-theoretic Foundations], Shinichi Mochizuki

			Additional papers on IUT
	# [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Panoramic%20Overview%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf A Panoramic Overview of Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory], Shinichi Mochizuki		# [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Panoramic%20Overview%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf A Panoramic Overview of Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory], Shinichi Mochizuki
	# [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Bogomolov%20from%20the%20Point%20of%20View%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf Bogomolov's Proof of the Geometric Version of the Szpiro Conjecture from the Point of View of Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory], Shinichi Mochizuki: "Bogomolov’s proof may be thought of as a sort of useful elementary guide, or blueprint (perhaps even a sort of Rosetta stone!), for understanding substantial portions of inter-universal Teichmüller theory."		# [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Bogomolov%20from%20the%20Point%20of%20View%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf Bogomolov's Proof of the Geometric Version of the Szpiro Conjecture from the Point of View of Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory], Shinichi Mochizuki: "Bogomolov’s proof may be thought of as a sort of useful elementary guide, or blueprint (perhaps even a sort of Rosetta stone!), for understanding substantial portions of inter-universal Teichmüller theory."
			# [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Alien%20Copies,%20Gaussians,%20and%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf The Mathematics of Mutually Alien Copies: from Gaussian Integrals to Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory.]

	Progress reports:		Progress reports:

Mabcp: /* Workshops */

2016-11-05T14:07:09Z

Workshops

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:07, 5 November 2016
Line 63:		Line 63:

	* '''7.-11. December 2015''': [https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/files/symcor.iut.html Clay Mathematics Institute workshop on the theory of Shinichi Mochizuki], Oxford		* '''7.-11. December 2015''': [https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/files/symcor.iut.html Clay Mathematics Institute workshop on the theory of Shinichi Mochizuki], Oxford

			* [https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/files/symcor.iut.cf.html Activities on the study of IUT theory of Shinichi Mochizuki]

	===Survey articles===		===Survey articles===

Mabcp: /* News Media */

2016-11-05T14:04:31Z

News Media

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:04, 5 November 2016
Line 137:		Line 137:
	*[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28065-our-numbers-up-machines-will-do-maths-well-never-understand/ Our number’s up: Machines will do maths we’ll never understand], New Scientist, 26 August 2015		*[https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28065-our-numbers-up-machines-will-do-maths-well-never-understand/ Our number’s up: Machines will do maths we’ll never understand], New Scientist, 26 August 2015
	*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509 The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof], Davide Castelvecchi, 07 October 2015, Nature News		*[http://www.nature.com/news/the-biggest-mystery-in-mathematics-shinichi-mochizuki-and-the-impenetrable-proof-1.18509 The biggest mystery in mathematics: Shinichi Mochizuki and the impenetrable proof], Davide Castelvecchi, 07 October 2015, Nature News
			*[https://www.quantamagazine.org/20151221-hope-rekindled-for-abc-proof/ Hope Rekindled for Perplexing Proof], Quanta Magazine, Kevin Hartnett, December 21, 2015
			*[http://www.nature.com/news/monumental-proof-to-torment-mathematicians-for-years-to-come-1.20342 Monumental proof to torment mathematicians for years to come], 28 July 2016, Nature News
			*[https://www.newscientist.com/article/2099534-mathematicians-finally-starting-to-understand-epic-abc-proof/ Mathematicians finally starting to understand epic ABC proof], New Scientist, 2 August 2016

	===Crowd News===		===Crowd News===

Mabcp: /* Survey articles */

2016-11-05T13:17:27Z

Survey articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:17, 5 November 2016
Line 68:		Line 68:
	*Shinichi Mochizuki, [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Panoramic%20Overview%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf Panoramic overview of inter-universal Teichmuller theory]		*Shinichi Mochizuki, [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Panoramic%20Overview%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf Panoramic overview of inter-universal Teichmuller theory]
	*Yamashita, [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/FAQ%20on%20Inter-Universality.pdf FAQ on ‘Inter-Universality’]		*Yamashita, [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/FAQ%20on%20Inter-Universality.pdf FAQ on ‘Inter-Universality’]
			*Ivan Fesenko, [http://inference-review.com/article/fukugen Fukugen]

	===Blogs===		===Blogs===

Mabcp: /* Survey articles */

2015-10-08T16:14:16Z

Survey articles

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 8 October 2015
Line 66:		Line 66:
	===Survey articles===		===Survey articles===
	*Ivan Fesenko, [https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/notesoniut.pdf Arithmetic deformation theory via arithmetic fundamental groups and nonarchimedean theta functions, notes on the work of Shinichi Mochizuki]		*Ivan Fesenko, [https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ibf/notesoniut.pdf Arithmetic deformation theory via arithmetic fundamental groups and nonarchimedean theta functions, notes on the work of Shinichi Mochizuki]
			*Shinichi Mochizuki, [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/Panoramic%20Overview%20of%20Inter-universal%20Teichmuller%20Theory.pdf Panoramic overview of inter-universal Teichmuller theory]
			*Yamashita, [http://www.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~motizuki/FAQ%20on%20Inter-Universality.pdf FAQ on ‘Inter-Universality’]

	===Blogs===		===Blogs===

Mabcp: /* See also */

2015-10-08T16:12:01Z

Mabcp: /* Crowd News */

2015-10-08T16:07:36Z

Crowd News

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 8 October 2015
Line 142:		Line 142:
	*[http://theconversation.edu.au/the-abc-conjecture-as-easy-as-1-2-3-or-not-10836 The abc conjecture, as easy as 1, 2, 3 ... or not ], The Conversation, Alexandru Ghitza, 26 Nov 2012.		*[http://theconversation.edu.au/the-abc-conjecture-as-easy-as-1-2-3-or-not-10836 The abc conjecture, as easy as 1, 2, 3 ... or not ], The Conversation, Alexandru Ghitza, 26 Nov 2012.
	*[http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/349199/description/A_theorem_in_limbo_shows_that_QED_is_not_the_last_word_in_a_mathematical_proof A theorem in limbo shows that QED is not the last word in a mathematical proof], March 25, 2013.		*[http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/349199/description/A_theorem_in_limbo_shows_that_QED_is_not_the_last_word_in_a_mathematical_proof A theorem in limbo shows that QED is not the last word in a mathematical proof], March 25, 2013.

			===See also===
			*[http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inter-universal+Teichm%C3%BCller+theory inter-universal Teichmüller theory] at the nLab
			*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenioid Frobenioid] at Wikipedia

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 8 October 2015
Line 145:		Line 145:
	===See also===		===See also===
	*[http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inter-universal+Teichm%C3%BCller+theory inter-universal Teichmüller theory] at the nLab		*[http://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/inter-universal+Teichm%C3%BCller+theory inter-universal Teichmüller theory] at the nLab
			*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-universal_Teichm%C3%BCller_theory Inter-universal Teichmüller theory] at Wikipedia
	*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenioid Frobenioid] at Wikipedia		*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frobenioid Frobenioid] at Wikipedia