<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Signed_sums_of_prime_reciprocals</id>
	<title>Signed sums of prime reciprocals - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Signed_sums_of_prime_reciprocals"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Signed_sums_of_prime_reciprocals&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-13T14:38:39Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.42.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Signed_sums_of_prime_reciprocals&amp;diff=2321&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Teorth: New page: One approach to finding non-smooth numbers (which, assuming a factoring oracle, would lead to progress on the finding primes problem) is as follows.  Suppose we wish to s...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://michaelnielsen.org/polymath/index.php?title=Signed_sums_of_prime_reciprocals&amp;diff=2321&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-08-12T17:43:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: One approach to finding non-smooth numbers (which, assuming a &lt;a href=&quot;/polymath/index.php?title=Factoring&quot; title=&quot;Factoring&quot;&gt;factoring oracle&lt;/a&gt;, would lead to progress on the &lt;a href=&quot;/polymath/index.php?title=Finding_primes&quot; title=&quot;Finding primes&quot;&gt;finding primes&lt;/a&gt; problem) is as follows.  Suppose we wish to s...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;One approach to finding non-smooth numbers (which, assuming a [[factoring|factoring oracle]], would lead to progress on the [[finding primes]] problem) is as follows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Suppose we wish to show that at least one integer in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[n,n+\log n]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; contains a prime factor larger than, say, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\log^{100} n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; (thus breaking the square root barrier).  We suppose this is not the case and obtain a contradiction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is then plausible that most integers in this interval contain about &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\log^{1-o(1)} n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; or so factors between, say, &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\log^{10} n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; and &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\log^{100} n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;.  (Using the [[W-trick]], one can probably eliminate primes much less than log n from consideration.)  In particular, we get a set &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;p_1,\ldots,p_k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of about &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\log^{2-o(1)} n&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; primes in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[\log^{10} n, \log^{100} n]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; which each divide an integer in &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;[n,n+\log n]&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;, which implies in particular that the n/p_i lies within &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O(1/\log^9 n)&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of an integer.  This implies that all of the 3^k signed sums&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: &amp;lt;math&amp;gt; \epsilon_1 n / p_1 + \ldots + \epsilon_k n / p_k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_i = -1,0,1&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; lie within &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;O( 1 / \log^{7-o(1)} n )&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; of an integer.  Hopefully this sort of concentration leads to some sort of contradiction.  For instance, it implies that &amp;lt;math&amp;gt;\epsilon_1/p_1 + \ldots + \epsilon_k/p_k&amp;lt;/math&amp;gt; cannot be used to approximate too many reciprocals 1/q too closely.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Teorth</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>