Talk:Fourier-analytic proof of Sperner - Revision history

Teorth: Undo revision 1474 by 194.8.75.50 (Talk)

2009-05-26T06:01:28Z

Undo revision 1474 by 194.8.75.50 (Talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:01, 25 May 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::: Oops, OK, I put the 4 in the right place, and added a few more words of description. I guess the symbol <math>{\Bbb E}</math> is used both for averaging and for expectation; I tried to clarify that it was averaging that was meant here. [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		::: Oops, OK, I put the 4 in the right place, and added a few more words of description. I guess the symbol <math>{\Bbb E}</math> is used both for averaging and for expectation; I tried to clarify that it was averaging that was meant here. [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

	~~== candace parker and sheldon williams~~
	==

	stephanie parente garden city http://fieldhumping.info/2374.php & mercedes benz gl450 roof rails william parente garden city <a href=http://fieldhumping.info/3122.php>mit keuschheitsg rtel spazieren gehen</a> <h1>gilly hicks</h1> http://fieldhumping.info/2375.php & mercedes benz sl top going down ruehl <a href=http://fieldhumping.info/3123.php>misumi museum blog entrance</a> holister http://fieldhumping.info/2376.php & mercedes car dealer in bellemeade kentucky aeropostale.com <a href=http://fieldhumping.info/3124.php>misty meadows got jam</a>

2009-05-25T21:20:36Z

candace parker and sheldon williams: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 25 May 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:

	::: Oops, OK, I put the 4 in the right place, and added a few more words of description. I guess the symbol <math>{\Bbb E}</math> is used both for averaging and for expectation; I tried to clarify that it was averaging that was meant here. [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)		::: Oops, OK, I put the 4 in the right place, and added a few more words of description. I guess the symbol <math>{\Bbb E}</math> is used both for averaging and for expectation; I tried to clarify that it was averaging that was meant here. [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

			== candace parker and sheldon williams
			==

			stephanie parente garden city http://fieldhumping.info/2374.php & mercedes benz gl450 roof rails william parente garden city <a href=http://fieldhumping.info/3122.php>mit keuschheitsg rtel spazieren gehen</a> <h1>gilly hicks</h1> http://fieldhumping.info/2375.php & mercedes benz sl top going down ruehl <a href=http://fieldhumping.info/3123.php>misumi museum blog entrance</a> holister http://fieldhumping.info/2376.php & mercedes car dealer in bellemeade kentucky aeropostale.com <a href=http://fieldhumping.info/3124.php>misty meadows got jam</a>

2009-03-01T19:22:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:22, 1 March 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	:: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks!		:: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks!
	:: One more thing. The conclusion of Lemma 1 involves expectation, but there is nothing random in the assumptions! What does the lemma actually say?		:: One more thing. The conclusion of Lemma 1 involves expectation, but there is nothing random in the assumptions! What does the lemma actually say?

			::: Oops, OK, I put the 4 in the right place, and added a few more words of description. I guess the symbol <math>{\Bbb E}</math> is used both for averaging and for expectation; I tried to clarify that it was averaging that was meant here. [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

2009-02-28T12:34:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 28 February 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:: I am afraid now the coefficient 16 is missing! ;-)		:: I am afraid now the coefficient 16 is missing! ;-)
	:: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks!		:: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks!
			:: One more thing. The conclusion of Lemma 1 involves expectation, but there is nothing random in the assumptions! What does the lemma actually say?

2009-02-28T12:26:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:26, 28 February 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Er, yeah. Well caught :-) [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)		:Er, yeah. Well caught :-) [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

			:: I am afraid now the coefficient 16 is missing! ;-)
			:: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks!

2009-02-26T19:51:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 26 February 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In (5), isn't the coefficient 4 in front of the sum missing?		In (5), isn't the coefficient 4 in front of the sum missing?

			:Er, yeah. Well caught :-) [[User:Teorth\|Terry]] 19:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

2009-02-26T14:34:58Z

New page: In (5), isn't the coefficient 4 in front of the sum missing?

New page

In (5), isn't the coefficient 4 in front of the sum missing?