Lemma 7.6: Difference between revisions
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs) Created page with "This page proves a lemma for the m=13 case of FUNC. ==Lemma 7.6:== If <math>\mathcal{A}</math> contains a size 5 set, then <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. WLOG le..." |
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page proves a lemma for the [[m=13 case of FUNC]]. | This page proves a lemma for the [[m=13 case of FUNC]]. It is a sublemma needed for the proof of [[Lemma 7]]. | ||
==Lemma 7.6:== | ==Lemma 7.6:== | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
If <math>\mathcal{A}</math> contains a size 5 set, then <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. | If <math>\mathcal{A}</math> contains a size 5 set, then <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. | ||
WLOG let that set be 12345. Let w(x)=6 | WLOG let that set be 12345. Let w(x)=6 if x=1,2,3,4, or 5 and w(x)=1 otherwise. The target weight is 35. | ||
==|K|=0:== | ==|K|=0:== | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==|K|=1:== | ==|K|=1:== | ||
The only possible set in this case is the <math>C_5</math> | The only possible set in this case is the <math>C_5</math> set 12345 (as any smaller sets would violate the assumption), and it has weight exactly 35, so there is no deficit in this case | ||
== | ==|K|=2:== | ||
Only <math>C_4</math> sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 1. There are 5 of them, so the total deficit is at most 5. However, the <math>C_5</math> set 12345 has surplus 5, so the surplus is at least as much as the deficit in this case. | |||
==|K|=3:== | |||
Only <math>C_3</math> sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 2. WLOG assume 123 is in C. We can pair the sets as follows: | |||
134, 234: 1234 | |||
135, 235: 1235 | |||
Any 2 of 124, 125, 145: 1245 (this cancels out the deficit of all but at most one of them) | |||
245 and 345: 2345 | |||
Thus, only 3 sets (including 123) can contribute to the deficit, which makes at most 6 net deficit. The <math>C_5</math> set has surplus 10. | |||
Therefore, <math>S \geq d+4</math>. | |||
==|K|=4:== | |||
Only <math>C_2</math> sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 3. The <math>C_5</math> set has surplus 15. | |||
WLOG assume 12 is in C. Pair sets as follows: | |||
23: 123 | |||
24: 124 | |||
25: 125 | |||
34: 1234 | |||
35: 1235 | |||
45: 1245 | |||
The other sets 13, 14, 15 can only have one set contributing to the deficit, due to: | |||
13 and 14: 134 | |||
13 and 15: 135 | |||
14 and 15: 145 | |||
Thus the net deficit is at most 6 (as only two sets can contribute to the net deficit). Therefore, <math>S \geq d+9</math>. | |||
==|K|=5:== | |||
Only the <math>C_1</math> sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 4. The <math>C_5</math> set has surplus 20. Either there is at most one of the <math>C_1</math> sets, in which case <math>S \geq d+16</math>, or there are at least 2. In that case, let them (WLOG) be 1 and 2. The other sets can be paired off as follows: | |||
3: 123 | |||
4: 124 | |||
5: 125 | |||
Thus, the net deficit is at most 8 in either case, and <math>S \geq d+12</math>. | |||
==|K|=6:== | |||
Only the <math>C_0</math> set has deficit (5), and the <math>C_5</math> set has surplus 25, so S=d+20 | |||
==|K|=7:== | |||
There are no deficit sets in this case. | |||
==|K|=8:== | |||
There are no deficit sets, and the <math>C_5</math> set has surplus 35. This is almost enough to balance out the deficit of the |K|=0 case. So, if any sets with <math>4 \leq |K| \rvert \leq 7</math>, then <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's, as each of those cases have at least 5 more surplus than deficit. If none of those sets are in <math>\mathcal{A}</math>, then every nonempty set has at least 3 of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. | |||
Thus, we can change the weight to be 1 on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 0 elsewhere. Now all nonempty sets are above the target weight (2.5), so <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. | |||
Either way, <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. | |||
QED |
Latest revision as of 12:11, 1 March 2021
This page proves a lemma for the m=13 case of FUNC. It is a sublemma needed for the proof of Lemma 7.
Lemma 7.6:
If [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] contains a size 5 set, then [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's.
WLOG let that set be 12345. Let w(x)=6 if x=1,2,3,4, or 5 and w(x)=1 otherwise. The target weight is 35.
|K|=0:
In this case there are only two sets, the empty set and the full set 12345. The deficit is therefore 35+5=40.
|K|=1:
The only possible set in this case is the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set 12345 (as any smaller sets would violate the assumption), and it has weight exactly 35, so there is no deficit in this case
|K|=2:
Only [math]\displaystyle{ C_4 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 1. There are 5 of them, so the total deficit is at most 5. However, the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set 12345 has surplus 5, so the surplus is at least as much as the deficit in this case.
|K|=3:
Only [math]\displaystyle{ C_3 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 2. WLOG assume 123 is in C. We can pair the sets as follows:
134, 234: 1234
135, 235: 1235
Any 2 of 124, 125, 145: 1245 (this cancels out the deficit of all but at most one of them)
245 and 345: 2345
Thus, only 3 sets (including 123) can contribute to the deficit, which makes at most 6 net deficit. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 10.
Therefore, [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+4 }[/math].
|K|=4:
Only [math]\displaystyle{ C_2 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 3. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 15.
WLOG assume 12 is in C. Pair sets as follows:
23: 123
24: 124
25: 125
34: 1234
35: 1235
45: 1245
The other sets 13, 14, 15 can only have one set contributing to the deficit, due to: 13 and 14: 134
13 and 15: 135
14 and 15: 145
Thus the net deficit is at most 6 (as only two sets can contribute to the net deficit). Therefore, [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+9 }[/math].
|K|=5:
Only the [math]\displaystyle{ C_1 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 4. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 20. Either there is at most one of the [math]\displaystyle{ C_1 }[/math] sets, in which case [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+16 }[/math], or there are at least 2. In that case, let them (WLOG) be 1 and 2. The other sets can be paired off as follows:
3: 123
4: 124
5: 125
Thus, the net deficit is at most 8 in either case, and [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+12 }[/math].
|K|=6:
Only the [math]\displaystyle{ C_0 }[/math] set has deficit (5), and the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 25, so S=d+20
|K|=7:
There are no deficit sets in this case.
|K|=8:
There are no deficit sets, and the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 35. This is almost enough to balance out the deficit of the |K|=0 case. So, if any sets with [math]\displaystyle{ 4 \leq |K| \rvert \leq 7 }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's, as each of those cases have at least 5 more surplus than deficit. If none of those sets are in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math], then every nonempty set has at least 3 of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Thus, we can change the weight to be 1 on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 0 elsewhere. Now all nonempty sets are above the target weight (2.5), so [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's.
Either way, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's. QED