Lemma 7.6: Difference between revisions
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page proves a lemma for the [[m=13 case of FUNC]]. It is a sublemma needed for the proof of [[Lemma 7]] | This page proves a lemma for the [[m=13 case of FUNC]]. It is a sublemma needed for the proof of [[Lemma 7]]. | ||
==Lemma 7.6:== | ==Lemma 7.6:== | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
If <math>\mathcal{A}</math> contains a size 5 set, then <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. | If <math>\mathcal{A}</math> contains a size 5 set, then <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is Frankl's. | ||
WLOG let that set be 12345. Let w(x)=6 | WLOG let that set be 12345. Let w(x)=6 if x=1,2,3,4, or 5 and w(x)=1 otherwise. The target weight is 35. | ||
==|K|=0:== | ==|K|=0:== | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
134, 234: 1234 | 134, 234: 1234 | ||
135, 235: 1235 | 135, 235: 1235 | ||
Any 2 of 124, 125, 145: 1245 (this cancels out the deficit of all but at most one of them) | Any 2 of 124, 125, 145: 1245 (this cancels out the deficit of all but at most one of them) | ||
245 and 345: 2345 | 245 and 345: 2345 | ||
Line 39: | Line 42: | ||
23: 123 | 23: 123 | ||
24: 124 | 24: 124 | ||
25: 125 | 25: 125 | ||
34: 1234 | 34: 1234 | ||
35: 1235 | 35: 1235 | ||
45: 1245 | 45: 1245 | ||
The other sets 13, 14, 15 can only have one set contributing to the deficit, due to: | The other sets 13, 14, 15 can only have one set contributing to the deficit, due to: | ||
13 and 14: 134 | 13 and 14: 134 | ||
13 and 15: 135 | 13 and 15: 135 | ||
14 and 15: 145 | 14 and 15: 145 | ||
Line 57: | Line 67: | ||
3: 123 | 3: 123 | ||
4: 124 | 4: 124 | ||
5: 125 | 5: 125 | ||
Latest revision as of 12:11, 1 March 2021
This page proves a lemma for the m=13 case of FUNC. It is a sublemma needed for the proof of Lemma 7.
Lemma 7.6:
If [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] contains a size 5 set, then [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's.
WLOG let that set be 12345. Let w(x)=6 if x=1,2,3,4, or 5 and w(x)=1 otherwise. The target weight is 35.
|K|=0:
In this case there are only two sets, the empty set and the full set 12345. The deficit is therefore 35+5=40.
|K|=1:
The only possible set in this case is the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set 12345 (as any smaller sets would violate the assumption), and it has weight exactly 35, so there is no deficit in this case
|K|=2:
Only [math]\displaystyle{ C_4 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 1. There are 5 of them, so the total deficit is at most 5. However, the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set 12345 has surplus 5, so the surplus is at least as much as the deficit in this case.
|K|=3:
Only [math]\displaystyle{ C_3 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 2. WLOG assume 123 is in C. We can pair the sets as follows:
134, 234: 1234
135, 235: 1235
Any 2 of 124, 125, 145: 1245 (this cancels out the deficit of all but at most one of them)
245 and 345: 2345
Thus, only 3 sets (including 123) can contribute to the deficit, which makes at most 6 net deficit. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 10.
Therefore, [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+4 }[/math].
|K|=4:
Only [math]\displaystyle{ C_2 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 3. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 15.
WLOG assume 12 is in C. Pair sets as follows:
23: 123
24: 124
25: 125
34: 1234
35: 1235
45: 1245
The other sets 13, 14, 15 can only have one set contributing to the deficit, due to: 13 and 14: 134
13 and 15: 135
14 and 15: 145
Thus the net deficit is at most 6 (as only two sets can contribute to the net deficit). Therefore, [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+9 }[/math].
|K|=5:
Only the [math]\displaystyle{ C_1 }[/math] sets cause deficit, and each of them has deficit 4. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 20. Either there is at most one of the [math]\displaystyle{ C_1 }[/math] sets, in which case [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+16 }[/math], or there are at least 2. In that case, let them (WLOG) be 1 and 2. The other sets can be paired off as follows:
3: 123
4: 124
5: 125
Thus, the net deficit is at most 8 in either case, and [math]\displaystyle{ S \geq d+12 }[/math].
|K|=6:
Only the [math]\displaystyle{ C_0 }[/math] set has deficit (5), and the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 25, so S=d+20
|K|=7:
There are no deficit sets in this case.
|K|=8:
There are no deficit sets, and the [math]\displaystyle{ C_5 }[/math] set has surplus 35. This is almost enough to balance out the deficit of the |K|=0 case. So, if any sets with [math]\displaystyle{ 4 \leq |K| \rvert \leq 7 }[/math], then [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's, as each of those cases have at least 5 more surplus than deficit. If none of those sets are in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math], then every nonempty set has at least 3 of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
Thus, we can change the weight to be 1 on 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 0 elsewhere. Now all nonempty sets are above the target weight (2.5), so [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's.
Either way, [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's. QED