Outline of second paper: Difference between revisions

From Polymath Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
* '''Address''': http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php  (Do we need a more stable address?)
* '''Address''': http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php  (Do we need a more stable address?)
* '''Email''': ???
* '''Email''': ???
* '''Title''': Density Hales-Jewett and Moser numbers in low dimensions.
* '''Title''': Density Hales-Jewett and Moser numbers  
* '''AMS Subject classification''': ???
* '''AMS Subject classification''': ???


Line 15: Line 15:
For any <math>n \geq 0</math> and <math>k \geq 1</math>, the density Hales-Jewett number <math>c_{n,k}</math> is defined as the size of the largest subset of the cube <math>[k]^n := \{1,\ldots,k\}^n</math> which contains no combinatorial line; similarly, the Moser number <math>c'_{n,k}</math> is the largest subset of the cube <math>[k]^n</math> which contains no geometric line.  A deep theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson [cite] shows that <math>c_{n,k} = o(k^n)</math> as <math>n \to \infty</math> (which implies a similar claim for <math>c'_{n,k}</math>; this is already non-trivial for <math>k=3</math>.  Several new proofs of this result have also been recently established [cite Polymath], [cite Austin].
For any <math>n \geq 0</math> and <math>k \geq 1</math>, the density Hales-Jewett number <math>c_{n,k}</math> is defined as the size of the largest subset of the cube <math>[k]^n := \{1,\ldots,k\}^n</math> which contains no combinatorial line; similarly, the Moser number <math>c'_{n,k}</math> is the largest subset of the cube <math>[k]^n</math> which contains no geometric line.  A deep theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson [cite] shows that <math>c_{n,k} = o(k^n)</math> as <math>n \to \infty</math> (which implies a similar claim for <math>c'_{n,k}</math>; this is already non-trivial for <math>k=3</math>.  Several new proofs of this result have also been recently established [cite Polymath], [cite Austin].


Using both human and computer-assisted arguments, we compute several values of <math>c_{n,k}</math> and <math>c'_{n,k}</math> for small <math>n,k</math>.  For instance the sequence <math>c_{n,3}</math> for <math>n=0,\ldots,6</math> is <math>1,2,6,18,52,150,450</math>, while the sequence <math>c'_{n,3}</math> for <math>n=0,\ldots,5</math> is <math>1,2,6,16,43,124</math>.  We also establish some results for higher <math>k</math>, showing for instance that an analogue of the LYM inequality (which relates to the <math>k=2</math> case) does not hold for higher <math>k</math>.
Using both human and computer-assisted arguments, we compute several values of <math>c_{n,k}</math> and <math>c'_{n,k}</math> for small <math>n,k</math>.  For instance the sequence <math>c_{n,3}</math> for <math>n=0,\ldots,6</math> is <math>1,2,6,18,52,150,450</math>, while the sequence <math>c'_{n,3}</math> for <math>n=0,\ldots,6</math> is <math>1,2,6,16,43,124,353</math>.  We also establish some results for higher <math>k</math>, showing for instance that an analogue of the LYM inequality (which relates to the <math>k=2</math> case) does not hold for higher <math>k</math>.


== Sections ==
== Sections ==
Line 44: Line 44:
* Hyper-optimistic conjecture, and its failure
* Hyper-optimistic conjecture, and its failure
* New bounds for colouring Hales-Jewett numbers
* New bounds for colouring Hales-Jewett numbers
* Kakeya problem for <math>Z_3^n</math>


=== Lower bounds for density Hales-Jewett ===
=== Lower bounds for density Hales-Jewett ===
Line 57: Line 58:
==== Very small n ====
==== Very small n ====


<math>n=0,1,2</math> are trivial.
<math>n=0,1,2</math> are trivial.  But the six-point examples will get mentioned a lot.


For <math>n=3</math>, one needs to classify the 17-point and 18-point examples.
For <math>n=3</math>, one needs to classify the 17-point and 18-point examples.
Line 76: Line 77:


Exact computations of <math>c_{2,k}, c_{3,k}</math>
Exact computations of <math>c_{2,k}, c_{3,k}</math>
Connection between Moser<math>(n,2k)</math> and DHJ<math>(n,k)</math>


Numerics
Numerics
Line 83: Line 86:
=== Lower bounds for Moser ===
=== Lower bounds for Moser ===


Using sphere packing to get lower bounds
Using Gamma sets to get lower bounds
 
Adding extra points from degenerate triangles


Implications between Moser and DHJ
Higher k; Implications between Moser and DHJ


=== Moser in low dimensions ===
=== Moser in low dimensions ===
Line 113: Line 118:
* [[moser.tex]]
* [[moser.tex]]
* [[moser-lower.tex]]
* [[moser-lower.tex]]
* [[fujimura.tex]]
* ([[fujimura.tex]])
* [[higherk.tex]]
* ([[higherk.tex]])
* [[genetic.tex]]
* ([[genetic.tex]])
* [[integer.tex]]
* ([[integer.tex]])
* [[coloring.tex]]
* ([[coloring.tex]])
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/06/alllinesin3n.pdf A figure depicting combinatorial lines]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/alllinesin3n.pdf A figure depicting combinatorial lines]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/allgeomlinesin3n.pdf A figure depicting geometric lines]
* [http://thomas1111.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/moser353new.png A figure depicting a 353-point 6D Moser set]
* [http://thomas1111.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/moser353new.png A figure depicting a 353-point 6D Moser set]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/fujimurapicture.pdf A figure depicting a Fujimura set]


The above are the master copies of the LaTeX files.  Below are various compiled versions of the source:
The above are the master copies of the LaTeX files.  Below are various compiled versions of the source:


* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/05/polymath.pdf May 24 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/05/polymath.pdf May 24 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/05/polymath1.pdf May 25 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/05/polymath1.pdf May 25 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/polymath2.pdf May 27 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/polymath2.pdf May 27 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/05/polymath3.pdf Jun 1 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/05/polymath3.pdf Jun 1 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/06/polymath.pdf Jun 3 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/06/polymath.pdf Jun 3 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/polymath2.pdf Jun 18 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/07/polymath.pdf Jul 9 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.wordpress.com/files/2009/07/polymath1.pdf Jul 25 2009 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/polymath.pdf Jan 15 2010 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/polymath1.pdf Jan 19 2010 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/polymath2.pdf Jan 22 2010 version]
* [http://terrytao.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/polymath3.pdf Jan 23 2010 version]

Latest revision as of 08:27, 23 January 2010

Here is a proposed outline of the second paper, which will focus on the new bounds on DHJ(3) and Moser numbers, and related quantities.

Metadata

Abstract

(A draft proposal - please edit)

For any [math]\displaystyle{ n \geq 0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ k \geq 1 }[/math], the density Hales-Jewett number [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,k} }[/math] is defined as the size of the largest subset of the cube [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^n := \{1,\ldots,k\}^n }[/math] which contains no combinatorial line; similarly, the Moser number [math]\displaystyle{ c'_{n,k} }[/math] is the largest subset of the cube [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^n }[/math] which contains no geometric line. A deep theorem of Furstenberg and Katznelson [cite] shows that [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,k} = o(k^n) }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ n \to \infty }[/math] (which implies a similar claim for [math]\displaystyle{ c'_{n,k} }[/math]; this is already non-trivial for [math]\displaystyle{ k=3 }[/math]. Several new proofs of this result have also been recently established [cite Polymath], [cite Austin].

Using both human and computer-assisted arguments, we compute several values of [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,k} }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ c'_{n,k} }[/math] for small [math]\displaystyle{ n,k }[/math]. For instance the sequence [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,3} }[/math] for [math]\displaystyle{ n=0,\ldots,6 }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ 1,2,6,18,52,150,450 }[/math], while the sequence [math]\displaystyle{ c'_{n,3} }[/math] for [math]\displaystyle{ n=0,\ldots,6 }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ 1,2,6,16,43,124,353 }[/math]. We also establish some results for higher [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math], showing for instance that an analogue of the LYM inequality (which relates to the [math]\displaystyle{ k=2 }[/math] case) does not hold for higher [math]\displaystyle{ k }[/math].

Sections

Introduction

Basic definitions. Definitions and notational conventions include

  • [k] = {1, 2, ..., k}
  • Subsets of [k]^n are called A
  • definition of combinatorial line, geometric line
  • Hales-Jewett numbers, Moser numbers

History of and motivation for the problem:

  • Sperner's theorem
  • Density Hales-Jewett theorem, including new proofs
  • Review literature on Moser problem

New results

  • Computation of several values of [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,3} }[/math]
  • Computation of several values of [math]\displaystyle{ c'_{n,3} }[/math]
  • Asymptotic lower bounds for [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,k} }[/math]
  • Genetic algorithm lower bounds
  • Some bounds for [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,k} }[/math] for low n and large k
  • Connection between Moser(2k) and DHJ(k)
  • Hyper-optimistic conjecture, and its failure
  • New bounds for colouring Hales-Jewett numbers
  • Kakeya problem for [math]\displaystyle{ Z_3^n }[/math]

Lower bounds for density Hales-Jewett

Fujimura implies DHJ lower bounds; some selected numerics (e.g. lower bounds up to 10 dimensions, plus a few dimensions afterwards).

The precise asymptotic bound of [math]\displaystyle{ c_{n,k} \gt C k^{n - \alpha(k)\sqrt[\ell]{\log n}+\beta(k) \log \log n} }[/math]

Discussion of genetic algorithm

Low-dimensional density Hales-Jewett numbers

Very small n

[math]\displaystyle{ n=0,1,2 }[/math] are trivial. But the six-point examples will get mentioned a lot.

For [math]\displaystyle{ n=3 }[/math], one needs to classify the 17-point and 18-point examples.

n=4

One needs to classify the 50-point, 51-point, and 52-point examples.

n=5

This is the big section, showing there are no 151-point examples.

n=6

Easy corollary of n=5 theory

Higher k DHJ numbers

Exact computations of [math]\displaystyle{ c_{2,k}, c_{3,k} }[/math]

Connection between Moser[math]\displaystyle{ (n,2k) }[/math] and DHJ[math]\displaystyle{ (n,k) }[/math]

Numerics

Failure of hyper-optimistic conjecture

Lower bounds for Moser

Using Gamma sets to get lower bounds

Adding extra points from degenerate triangles

Higher k; Implications between Moser and DHJ

Moser in low dimensions

There is some general slicing lemma that needs to be proved here that allows inequalities for low-dim Moser to imply inequalities for higher dim.

For n=0,1,2 the theory is trivial.

For n=3 we need the classification of Pareto optimal configurations etc. So far this is only done by computer brute force search; we may have to find a human version.

n=4 theory: include both computer results and human results

n=5: we have a proof using the n=4 computer data; we should keep looking for a purely human proof.

n=6: we can give the partial results we have.

Fujimura's problem

Coloring DHJ

Files

The above are the master copies of the LaTeX files. Below are various compiled versions of the source: