Online reactions to Deolalikar P vs NP paper: Difference between revisions

From Polymath Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
→‎Theory blogs: added the new GASARCH post
Line 32: Line 32:
* [http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/proofs-proofs-who-needs-proofs Proofs, Proofs, Who Needs Proofs?], Richard Lipton and Ken Regan, Gödel’s lost letter and P=NP, August 18 2010.
* [http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/18/proofs-proofs-who-needs-proofs Proofs, Proofs, Who Needs Proofs?], Richard Lipton and Ken Regan, Gödel’s lost letter and P=NP, August 18 2010.
* [http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/projections-can-be-tricky Projections can be tricky], Richard Lipton and Ken Regan, Gödel’s lost letter and P=NP, August 19 2010.
* [http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/19/projections-can-be-tricky Projections can be tricky], Richard Lipton and Ken Regan, Gödel’s lost letter and P=NP, August 19 2010.
* [http://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2010/09/intelligent-questions-about-alleged-p.html Intelligent questions about the alleged P NE NP proof], Bill Gasarch, September 1, 2010


=== Media and aggregators ===
=== Media and aggregators ===

Revision as of 09:47, 1 September 2010

Online reactions

Additions to the list are of course very welcome.

Theory blogs

Media and aggregators

8th August

9th August

10th August

11th August

12th August

13th August

15th August

16th August

17th August

19 August

20 August

23 August

Real-time searches

Other