Side Proof 5: Difference between revisions
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs) |
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
f[411,418] = -5-f(139), so f(139)=-1. f[139,154] = -6+f(149)+f(151), so f(149)=f(151)=1. However, now f[295,302] = 6, which forces the discrepancy above 3. | f[411,418] = -5-f(139), so f(139)=-1. f[139,154] = -6+f(149)+f(151), so f(149)=f(151)=1. However, now f[295,302] = 6, which forces the discrepancy above 3. | ||
This completes side proof 5. The assumption f(67)=1 fails at 688. | |||
Latest revision as of 00:36, 16 June 2015
This page will handle one of the long cases in the Human proof that completely multiplicative sequences have discrepancy greater than 3, so that the page can be shorter and not have so many long sections. Specifically, this page will take care of the case where we assume: f(2)=f(7)=f(19)=f(67)=1, f(23)=-1.
Proof
s(74)=4+f(71)+f(73), so f(71)=f(73)=1.
We have two equations:
1) f[145,154] = -4+f(149)+f(151) >= -4
2) f[295,304] = 5-f(101)+f(149)+f(151) <= 4
Subtracting (2) from (1) we get:
(1)-(2) = -9+f(101) >= -8, so f(101)=1
Updating the table:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0|+ + - + - - + + + 0-9 - - - - + + + - + + 10-19 - - - - - + - - + + 20-29 + - + + - - + + + + 30-39 - - - + - - - + - + 40-49 + + - - - + + - + - 50-59 + - - + + + + + - + 60-69 - - + - + - + - + + 70-79 - + - - - + + - - + 80-89 - - - + + - - ? + - 90-99 + + + ? - + - ? - ? 100-109 + - + + - + + - - - 110-119 + + - + - - + ? + - 120-129 + ? + + + + - ? + ? 130-139
We have four equations:
1) f[485,514] = -7-f(97)+f(127)-f(163)-f(167)+f(251)+f(257)+f(487)+f(491)+f(499)+f(503)+f(509) >= -4
2) f[251,266] = 7+f(127)+f(131)+f(251)+f(257)+f(263) <= 4
3) f[319,336] = -7-f(107)-f(109)+f(163)+f(167)+f(331) >= -4
4) f[207,218] = -5+f(107)+f(109)+f(211) >= -4
Adding them together like this:
(1)-(2)+(3)+(4)+26: -f(97)-f(131)+f(211)-f(263)+f(331)+f(487)+f(491)+f(499)+f(503)+f(509) >= 10
Therefore: f(97)=f(131)=f(263)=-1, f(211)=f(331)=f(487)=f(491)=f(499)=f(503)=f(509)=1.
f[219,232] = 7+f(223)+f(227)+f(229), so f(223)=f(227)=f(229)=-1. f[681,688] = 6-f(137)+f(683), so f(137)=1 and f(683)=-1. f[125,138] = 5+f(127), so f(127)=-1.
We now have two equations:
1) s(138) = 3+f(103)+f(107)+f(109) <= 2
2) f[207,218] = -4+f(107)+f(109) >= -4
(2)-(1)+7: -f(103) >= 1
Therefore, f(103) = -1.
f[411,418] = -5-f(139), so f(139)=-1. f[139,154] = -6+f(149)+f(151), so f(149)=f(151)=1. However, now f[295,302] = 6, which forces the discrepancy above 3.
This completes side proof 5. The assumption f(67)=1 fails at 688.
