DHJ(k) implies multidimensional DHJ(k): Difference between revisions
→To appear soon: Removed section, for now at least |
Reverting to earlier version, after mystery vandalism |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Let <math>\mathcal{A}</math> be a [[density]]-<math>\delta</math> subset of <math>[k]^n</math> and let M be large enough so that every subset of <math>[k]^M</math> of density at least <math>\theta</math> contains a [[combinatorial line]]. Now split <math>[k]^n</math> up into <math>[k]^M\times[k]^{n-M}.</math> For a proportion at least <math>\delta/2</math> of the points y in <math>[k]^{n-M}</math> the set of <math>x\in[k]^M</math> such that <math>(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}</math> has density at least <math>\delta/2.</math> Therefore, by DHJ(k) (with <math>\theta=\delta/2</math>) we have a combinatorial line. Since there are fewer than <math>(k+1)^M</math> combinatorial lines to choose from, by the pigeonhole principle we can find a combinatorial line <math>L\subset[k]^M</math> and a set <math>\mathcal{A}_1</math> of density <math>\delta/2(k+1)^M</math> in <math>[k]^{n-M}</math> such that <math>(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}</math> whenever <math>x\in L</math> and <math>y\in\mathcal{A}_1.</math> And now by induction we can find an (m-1)-dimensional subspace in <math>\mathcal{A}_1</math> and we're done. | Let <math>\mathcal{A}</math> be a [[density]]-<math>\delta</math> subset of <math>[k]^n</math> and let M be large enough so that every subset of <math>[k]^M</math> of density at least <math>\theta</math> contains a [[combinatorial line]]. Now split <math>[k]^n</math> up into <math>[k]^M\times[k]^{n-M}.</math> For a proportion at least <math>\delta/2</math> of the points y in <math>[k]^{n-M}</math> the set of <math>x\in[k]^M</math> such that <math>(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}</math> has density at least <math>\delta/2.</math> Therefore, by DHJ(k) (with <math>\theta=\delta/2</math>) we have a combinatorial line. Since there are fewer than <math>(k+1)^M</math> combinatorial lines to choose from, by the pigeonhole principle we can find a combinatorial line <math>L\subset[k]^M</math> and a set <math>\mathcal{A}_1</math> of density <math>\delta/2(k+1)^M</math> in <math>[k]^{n-M}</math> such that <math>(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}</math> whenever <math>x\in L</math> and <math>y\in\mathcal{A}_1.</math> And now by induction we can find an (m-1)-dimensional subspace in <math>\mathcal{A}_1</math> and we're done. | ||
==A weak multidimensional DHJ(k) implies DHJ(k)== | |||
It is also true that a weak multidimensional DHJ(k) implies DHJ(k). We will show that the following statement is equivalent to DHJ(k): | |||
“There is a constant, c < 1 that for every d there is an n that any c-dense subset of <math> [k]^n</math> contains a d-dimensional subspace.” | |||
We should show that the statement above implies DHJ(k). As before, write <math> [k]^n</math> as <math> [k]^r\times[k]^s </math> , where s is much bigger than r. For each <math> y\in [k]^s</math> , define <math> \mathcal{A}_y</math> to be <math> \{x\in[k]^r:(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}\}</math> . Let Y denote the set of <math> y\in [k]^s</math> such that <math>\mathcal{A}_y</math> is empty. Suppose that <math> \mathcal{A} </math> is large, line-free, and its density is <math> \delta =\Delta-\epsilon</math> where <math> \Delta</math> is the limit of density of line-free sets and <math> \epsilon < (1-c)\Delta</math> . We can also suppose that no <math> \mathcal{A}_y</math> has density much larger than <math> \Delta</math> as that would guarantee a combinatorial line. But then the density of Y is at most 1-c, so there is a c-dense set, <math> Z=[k]^s-Y</math>, such that any element is a tail of some elements of <math> \mathcal{A}</math> . For every <math> y \in Z</math> choose an <math> x\in [k]^r:(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}</math> . This x will be the colour of y. It gives a <math> [k]^r</math> colouring on Z. By the initial condition Z contains arbitrary large subspaces, so by HJ(k) we get a line in <math> \mathcal{A}</math> . |
Latest revision as of 11:10, 24 April 2009
Introduction
This is a result that will be needed if the proof of DHJ(3) is correct and we want to push it through for DHJ(k).
The proof
Let [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] be a density-[math]\displaystyle{ \delta }[/math] subset of [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^n }[/math] and let M be large enough so that every subset of [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^M }[/math] of density at least [math]\displaystyle{ \theta }[/math] contains a combinatorial line. Now split [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^n }[/math] up into [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^M\times[k]^{n-M}. }[/math] For a proportion at least [math]\displaystyle{ \delta/2 }[/math] of the points y in [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^{n-M} }[/math] the set of [math]\displaystyle{ x\in[k]^M }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ (x,y)\in\mathcal{A} }[/math] has density at least [math]\displaystyle{ \delta/2. }[/math] Therefore, by DHJ(k) (with [math]\displaystyle{ \theta=\delta/2 }[/math]) we have a combinatorial line. Since there are fewer than [math]\displaystyle{ (k+1)^M }[/math] combinatorial lines to choose from, by the pigeonhole principle we can find a combinatorial line [math]\displaystyle{ L\subset[k]^M }[/math] and a set [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A}_1 }[/math] of density [math]\displaystyle{ \delta/2(k+1)^M }[/math] in [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^{n-M} }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ (x,y)\in\mathcal{A} }[/math] whenever [math]\displaystyle{ x\in L }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ y\in\mathcal{A}_1. }[/math] And now by induction we can find an (m-1)-dimensional subspace in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A}_1 }[/math] and we're done.
A weak multidimensional DHJ(k) implies DHJ(k)
It is also true that a weak multidimensional DHJ(k) implies DHJ(k). We will show that the following statement is equivalent to DHJ(k):
“There is a constant, c < 1 that for every d there is an n that any c-dense subset of [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^n }[/math] contains a d-dimensional subspace.”
We should show that the statement above implies DHJ(k). As before, write [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^n }[/math] as [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^r\times[k]^s }[/math] , where s is much bigger than r. For each [math]\displaystyle{ y\in [k]^s }[/math] , define [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A}_y }[/math] to be [math]\displaystyle{ \{x\in[k]^r:(x,y)\in\mathcal{A}\} }[/math] . Let Y denote the set of [math]\displaystyle{ y\in [k]^s }[/math] such that [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A}_y }[/math] is empty. Suppose that [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is large, line-free, and its density is [math]\displaystyle{ \delta =\Delta-\epsilon }[/math] where [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta }[/math] is the limit of density of line-free sets and [math]\displaystyle{ \epsilon \lt (1-c)\Delta }[/math] . We can also suppose that no [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A}_y }[/math] has density much larger than [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta }[/math] as that would guarantee a combinatorial line. But then the density of Y is at most 1-c, so there is a c-dense set, [math]\displaystyle{ Z=[k]^s-Y }[/math], such that any element is a tail of some elements of [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] . For every [math]\displaystyle{ y \in Z }[/math] choose an [math]\displaystyle{ x\in [k]^r:(x,y)\in\mathcal{A} }[/math] . This x will be the colour of y. It gives a [math]\displaystyle{ [k]^r }[/math] colouring on Z. By the initial condition Z contains arbitrary large subspaces, so by HJ(k) we get a line in [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] .