Insensitive.tex: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
\section{\texorpdfstring{$ab$}{ab}-insensitive sets} | \section{\texorpdfstring{$ab$}{ab}-insensitive sets} | ||
\begin{definition} Let $a, b \in [k]$ be distinct, and $I \subseteq [n]$. We say that $A \subseteq [k]^n$ is \emph{$ab$-insensitive on $I$} if the following condition holds: | \begin{definition} Let $a, b \in [k]$ be distinct, and $I \subseteq [n]$. We say that $A \subseteq [k]^n$ is \emph{$ab$-insensitive on~$I$} if the following condition holds: $x \in A$ iff $\chg{x}{a}{b} \in A$. | ||
\end{definition} | \end{definition} | ||
\begin{remark} This definition is symmetric in $a$ and $b$. It is perhaps easier to understand the condition as follows: ``altering some $a$'s to $b$'s and some $b$'s to $a$'s does not affect presence/absence in $A$''. | |||
\end{remark} | |||
\noteryan{Just putting | \noteryan{Just putting the following statement of subspace-DHJ(k) under product distributions here for the future} | ||
\begin{theorem} \label{thm:subsp} Let $d \in \N$, $0 < \eta < 1$, and let $\pi$ be a distribution on $[k]$. Then assuming | \begin{theorem} \label{thm:subsp} Let $d \in \N$, $0 < \eta < 1$, and let $\pi$ be a distribution on $[k]$. Then assuming | ||
\[ | \[ |
Revision as of 13:49, 15 May 2009
\section{\texorpdfstring{$ab$}{ab}-insensitive sets}
\begin{definition} Let $a, b \in [k]$ be distinct, and $I \subseteq [n]$. We say that $A \subseteq [k]^n$ is \emph{$ab$-insensitive on~$I$} if the following condition holds: $x \in A$ iff $\chg{x}{a}{b} \in A$. \end{definition} \begin{remark} This definition is symmetric in $a$ and $b$. It is perhaps easier to understand the condition as follows: ``altering some $a$'s to $b$'s and some $b$'s to $a$'s does not affect presence/absence in $A$. \end{remark}
\noteryan{Just putting the following statement of subspace-DHJ(k) under product distributions here for the future}
\begin{theorem} \label{thm:subsp} Let $d \in \N$, $0 < \eta < 1$, and let $\pi$ be a distribution on $[k]$. Then assuming
\[
n \geq n_{\ref{thm:subsp}}(k,d,\eta,\pi) := to be determined,
\]
every set $A \subseteq [k]^n$ with $\pi^{\otimes n}(A) \geq \eta$ contains a nondegenerate $d$-dimensional subspace.
\end{theorem}