Moser's cube problem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
which is comparable to <math>4^n/\sqrt{n}</math> by [[Stirling's formula]]. | which is comparable to <math>4^n/\sqrt{n}</math> by [[Stirling's formula]]. | ||
For k=5 (values 0,1,2,3,4) If A, B, C, D, and E denote the numbers of 0-s, 1-s, 2-s, 3-s, and 4-s then the first three points of a geometric line form a 3-term arithmetic progression in A+E+2(B+D)+3C. So, for k=5 we have a similar lower bound for the Moser’s problem as for DHJ k=3, i.e. <math>5^{n - O(\sqrt{\log n})}</math>. |
Revision as of 10:29, 16 February 2009
Define a Moser set to be a subset of [math]\displaystyle{ [3]^n }[/math] which does not contain any geometric line, and let [math]\displaystyle{ c'_n }[/math] denote the size of the largest Moser set in [math]\displaystyle{ [3]^n }[/math]. The first few values are (see OEIS A003142):
- [math]\displaystyle{ c'_0 = 1; c'_1 = 2; c'_2 = 6; c'_3 = 16; c'_4 = 43. }[/math]
Beyond this point, we only have some upper and lower bounds, e.g. [math]\displaystyle{ 120 \leq c'_5 \leq 129 }[/math]; see this spreadsheet for the latest bounds.
The best known asymptotic lower bound for [math]\displaystyle{ c'_n }[/math] is
- [math]\displaystyle{ c'_n \gg 3^n/\sqrt{n} }[/math],
formed by fixing the number of 2s to a single value near n/3. Is it possible to do any better? Note that we have a significantly better bound for [math]\displaystyle{ c_n }[/math]:
- [math]\displaystyle{ c'_n \geq 3^{n-O(\sqrt{\log n})} }[/math].
A more precise lower bound is
- [math]\displaystyle{ c'_n \geq \binom{n+1}{q} 2^{n-q} }[/math]
where q is the nearest integer to [math]\displaystyle{ n/3 }[/math], formed by taking all strings with q 2s, together with all strings with q-1 2s and an odd number of 1s. This for instance gives the lower bound [math]\displaystyle{ c'_5 \geq 120 }[/math], which compares with the upper bound [math]\displaystyle{ c'_5 \leq 4 c'_3 = 129 }[/math].
Variants
A straightforward lower bound for Moser’s cube k=4 (values 0,1,2,3) is: q entries are 1 or 2; or q-1 entries are 1 or 2 and an odd number of entries are 0. This gives a lower bound of
[math]\displaystyle{ \binom{n}{n/2} 2^n + \binom{n}{n/2-1} 2^{n-1} }[/math]
which is comparable to [math]\displaystyle{ 4^n/\sqrt{n} }[/math] by Stirling's formula.
For k=5 (values 0,1,2,3,4) If A, B, C, D, and E denote the numbers of 0-s, 1-s, 2-s, 3-s, and 4-s then the first three points of a geometric line form a 3-term arithmetic progression in A+E+2(B+D)+3C. So, for k=5 we have a similar lower bound for the Moser’s problem as for DHJ k=3, i.e. [math]\displaystyle{ 5^{n - O(\sqrt{\log n})} }[/math].