Sylvester's sequence: Difference between revisions
m I...made a gigantic slip, forgot what squarefree meant. Sorry. |
m fix OEIS link |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Sylvester's sequence''' <math>a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots</math> is defined recursively by setting <math>a_1=2</math> and <math>a_k = a_1 \ldots a_{k-1}+1</math> for all subsequent k, thus the sequence begins | '''Sylvester's sequence''' <math>a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots</math> is defined recursively by setting <math>a_1=2</math> and <math>a_k = a_1 \ldots a_{k-1}+1</math> for all subsequent k, thus the sequence begins | ||
: 2, 3, 7, 43, 1807, 3263443, 10650056950807, 113423713055421844361000443 (sequence [http:// | : 2, 3, 7, 43, 1807, 3263443, 10650056950807, 113423713055421844361000443 (sequence [http://oeis.org/A000058 A000058] in OEIS). | ||
The elements of this sequence are mutually coprime, so after factoring k of them, one is guaranteed to have at least k prime factors. | The elements of this sequence are mutually coprime, so after factoring k of them, one is guaranteed to have at least k prime factors. |
Latest revision as of 20:30, 29 September 2015
Sylvester's sequence [math]\displaystyle{ a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots }[/math] is defined recursively by setting [math]\displaystyle{ a_1=2 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ a_k = a_1 \ldots a_{k-1}+1 }[/math] for all subsequent k, thus the sequence begins
- 2, 3, 7, 43, 1807, 3263443, 10650056950807, 113423713055421844361000443 (sequence A000058 in OEIS).
The elements of this sequence are mutually coprime, so after factoring k of them, one is guaranteed to have at least k prime factors.
There is a connection to the finding primes project: It is a result of Odoni that the number of primes less than n that can divide any one of the [math]\displaystyle{ a_k }[/math] is [math]\displaystyle{ O(n / \log n \log\log\log n) }[/math] rather than [math]\displaystyle{ O(n / \log n) }[/math] (the prime number theorem bound). If we then factor the first k elements of this sequence, we must get a prime of size at least [math]\displaystyle{ k\log k \log \log \log k }[/math] or so.
It is also conjectured that this sequence is square-free; if so, [math]\displaystyle{ a_k, a_k-1 }[/math] form a pair of square-free integers, settling a toy problem in the finding primes project.