Talk:Logo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
I propose going with http://ixitol.com/PolyMath4.jpg. I'll wait a couple of days more for objections / alternate suggestions, and if none are made, I'll make that the logo. | I propose going with http://ixitol.com/PolyMath4.jpg. I'll wait a couple of days more for objections / alternate suggestions, and if none are made, I'll make that the logo. | ||
--[[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 19:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | --[[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 19:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC) | ||
I'm also not wild about any of them, but I find it hard to say why. I think the best explanation I can think of is that they are insufficiently compact — they look more like words than logos. Maybe one could make a logo just out of a <math>\pi</math> and a <math>\mu</math>. -- [[User:Gowers|Gowers]] |
Revision as of 09:25, 25 May 2011
Please leave comments here, identifying your favourite, or favourites.
My opinion
I don’t like any logo of the suggested.
This is not as bad as the rest: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/126293/polymath-v1.png VictorPorton 18:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Simple Logo
Here is a simple proposal: https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/Ns8fhSWnpeh0Hdm6rgum5g?feat=directlink
Opinion
I particularly like the first logo to use the "Sigma" idea. It's simple and direct, but the Sigma conveys an interesting double message. I would perhaps like something a bit brighter, though.
--WikiSysop 16:18, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
How about something simple, involving mathematical characters? For example: http://tinyurl.com/3arb6wy
I just whipped this up in word so it's more of an idea that someone with photoshop skills may wish to take further
--Aindriu 22:29, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
I like this new suggestion from Russell: http://ixitol.com/PolyMath2.jpg. Not sure the black background works, but the bright and varied colours are great. It suggests variation, but with an ultimate cohesiveness.
--WikiSysop 18:46, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Maybe combine the bright colours of http://ixitol.com/PolyMath2.jpg with the "Sigma" idea from http://cl.ly/3Y23180A1U2j3I0M2C1K.png? --WikiSysop 18:48, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Re "Maybe combine..."; That could work... perhaps send out a hi-rez 'sigma' image, to whomever is interested, for trying out various color schemes.
-- Russell
I like Russell's latest design a lot: http://ixitol.com/PolyMath4.jpg. It's a simple, clean design, that still conveys the idea of many contributions.
--WikiSysop 10:53, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Author of "simple sigma" logo here. Sorry - didn't notice the discussion on here. I'll post a link to a vector version of the simple sigma logo and a brighter version in a bit. --IgorKofman
@IgorKofman - great, look forward to seeing it. --WikiSysop 14:14, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
I propose going with http://ixitol.com/PolyMath4.jpg. I'll wait a couple of days more for objections / alternate suggestions, and if none are made, I'll make that the logo. --WikiSysop 19:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
I'm also not wild about any of them, but I find it hard to say why. I think the best explanation I can think of is that they are insufficiently compact — they look more like words than logos. Maybe one could make a logo just out of a [math]\displaystyle{ \pi }[/math] and a [math]\displaystyle{ \mu }[/math]. -- Gowers