Polymath15 test problem: Difference between revisions
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
== Controlling |A+B|/|B_0| == | == Controlling |A+B|/|B_0| == | ||
Some numerical data on <math>|A+B/B_0|</math> [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/02/02/polymath15-second-thread-generalising-the-riemann-siegel-approximate-functional-equation/#comment-492341 source], using a step size of 1 for <math>x</math>, suggesting that this ratio tends to oscillate roughly between 0.5 and 3 for medium values of <math>x</math>: | Some numerical data on <math>|A+B/B_0|</math> [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/02/02/polymath15-second-thread-generalising-the-riemann-siegel-approximate-functional-equation/#comment-492341 source] and also <math>\mathrm{Re} \frac{A+B}{B_0}</math> [https://terrytao.wordpress.com/2018/02/02/polymath15-second-thread-generalising-the-riemann-siegel-approximate-functional-equation/#comment-492445 source], using a step size of 1 for <math>x</math>, suggesting that this ratio tends to oscillate roughly between 0.5 and 3 for medium values of <math>x</math>: | ||
{| border=1 | {| border=1 | ||
Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
! average value | ! average value | ||
! standard deviation | ! standard deviation | ||
! min real part | |||
! max real part | |||
|- | |- | ||
|0-1000 | |0-1000 | ||
Line 194: | Line 196: | ||
|1.219 | |1.219 | ||
|0.782 | |0.782 | ||
|-0.09 | |||
|4.06 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|1000-2000 | |1000-2000 | ||
Line 200: | Line 204: | ||
|1.164 | |1.164 | ||
|0.712 | |0.712 | ||
|0.02 | |||
|4.43 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|2000-3000 | |2000-3000 | ||
Line 206: | Line 212: | ||
|1.145 | |1.145 | ||
|0.671 | |0.671 | ||
|0.15 | |||
|3.99 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|3000-4000 | |3000-4000 | ||
Line 212: | Line 220: | ||
|1.134 | |1.134 | ||
|0.640 | |0.640 | ||
|0.34 | |||
|4.48 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|4000-5000 | |4000-5000 | ||
Line 218: | Line 228: | ||
|1.128 | |1.128 | ||
|0.615 | |0.615 | ||
|0.33 | |||
|4.33 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|5000-6000 | |5000-6000 | ||
Line 224: | Line 236: | ||
|1.120 | |1.120 | ||
|0.599 | |0.599 | ||
|0.377 | |||
|4.327 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>1-10^5</math> | |<math>1-10^5</math> | ||
Line 230: | Line 244: | ||
|1.077 | |1.077 | ||
|0.455 | |0.455 | ||
|-0.09 | |||
|4.48 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>10^5-2 \times 10^5</math> | |<math>10^5-2 \times 10^5</math> | ||
Line 236: | Line 252: | ||
|1.053 | |1.053 | ||
|0.361 | |0.361 | ||
|0.48 | |||
|3.32 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>2 \times 10^5-3 \times 10^5</math> | |<math>2 \times 10^5-3 \times 10^5</math> | ||
Line 242: | Line 260: | ||
|1.047 | |1.047 | ||
|0.335 | |0.335 | ||
|0.50 | |||
|3.00 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>3 \times 10^5-4 \times 10^5</math> | |<math>3 \times 10^5-4 \times 10^5</math> | ||
Line 248: | Line 268: | ||
|1.043 | |1.043 | ||
|0.321 | |0.321 | ||
|0.52 | |||
|2.97 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>4 \times 10^5-5 \times 10^5</math> | |<math>4 \times 10^5-5 \times 10^5</math> | ||
Line 254: | Line 276: | ||
|1.041 | |1.041 | ||
|0.310 | |0.310 | ||
|0.53 | |||
|2.82 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>5 \times 10^5-6 \times 10^5</math> | |<math>5 \times 10^5-6 \times 10^5</math> | ||
Line 260: | Line 284: | ||
|1.039 | |1.039 | ||
|0.303 | |0.303 | ||
|0.53 | |||
|2.75 | |||
|- | |- | ||
|<math>6 \times 10^5-7 \times 10^5</math> | |<math>6 \times 10^5-7 \times 10^5</math> | ||
Line 266: | Line 292: | ||
|1.038 | |1.038 | ||
|0.296 | |0.296 | ||
|0.55 | |||
|2.72 | |||
|} | |} | ||
... | ... | ||
Revision as of 08:36, 24 February 2018
We are initially focusing attention on the following
- Test problem For [math]\displaystyle{ t=y=0.4 }[/math], can one prove that [math]\displaystyle{ H_t(x+iy) \neq 0 }[/math] for all [math]\displaystyle{ x \geq 0 }[/math]?
If we can show this, it is likely that (with the additional use of the argument principle, and some further information on the behaviour of [math]\displaystyle{ H_t(x+iy) }[/math] at [math]\displaystyle{ y=0.4 }[/math]) that one can show that [math]\displaystyle{ H_t(x+iy) \neq 0 }[/math] for all [math]\displaystyle{ y \geq 0.4 }[/math] as well. This would give a new upper bound
- [math]\displaystyle{ \Lambda \leq 0.4 + \frac{1}{2} (0.4)^2 = 0.48 }[/math]
for the de Bruijn-Newman constant.
For very small values of [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] we expect to be able to establish this by direct calculation of [math]\displaystyle{ H_t(x+iy) }[/math]. For medium or large values, the strategy is to use a suitable approximation
- [math]\displaystyle{ H_t(x+iy) \approx A + B }[/math]
for some relatively easily computable quantities [math]\displaystyle{ A = A_t(x+iy), B = B_t(x+iy) }[/math] (it may possibly be necessary to use a refined approximation [math]\displaystyle{ A+B-C }[/math] instead). The quantity [math]\displaystyle{ B }[/math] contains a non-zero main term [math]\displaystyle{ B_0 }[/math] which is expected to roughly dominate. To show [math]\displaystyle{ H_t(x+iy) }[/math] is non-zero, it would suffice to show that
- [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{|H_t - A - B|}{|B_0|} \lt \frac{|A + B|}{|B_0|}. }[/math]
Thus one will seek upper bounds on the error [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{|H_t - A - B|}{|B_0|} }[/math] and lower bounds on [math]\displaystyle{ \frac{|A+B|}{|B_0|} }[/math] for various ranges of [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math]. Numerically it seems that the RHS stays above 0.4 as soon as [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] is moderately large, while the LHS stays below 0.1, which looks promising for the rigorous arguments.
Choices of approximation
There are a number of slightly different approximations we have used in previous discussion. The first approximation was
- [math]\displaystyle{ A := \frac{1}{8} \frac{s(s-1)}{2} \pi^{-s/2} \Gamma(s/2) \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\exp(\frac{t}{16} \log^2 \frac{s+4}{2\pi n^2})}{n^s} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B := \frac{1}{8} \frac{s(s-1)}{2} \pi^{-(1-s)/2} \Gamma((1-s)/2) \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\exp(\frac{t}{16} \log^2 \frac{5-s}{2\pi n^2})}{n^{1-s}} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B_0 := \frac{1}{8} \frac{s(s-1)}{2} \pi^{-(1-s)/2} \Gamma((1-s)/2) \exp( \frac{t}{16} \log^2 \frac{5-s}{2\pi} ) }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ s := \frac{1-y+ix}{2} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ N := \lfloor \frac{\mathrm{Im} s}{2\pi} \rfloor = \lfloor \frac{x}{4\pi} \rfloor. }[/math]
This was modified slightly to
- [math]\displaystyle{ A' := \frac{2}{8} \pi^{-s/2} \sqrt{2\pi} \exp( (\frac{s+4}{2}-\frac{1}{2}) \log \frac{s+4}{2} - \frac{s+4}{2}) \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\exp(\frac{t}{16} \log^2 \frac{s+4}{2\pi n^2})}{n^s} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B' := \frac{2}{8} \pi^{-(1-s)/2} \sqrt{2\pi} \exp( (\frac{5-s}{2}-\frac{1}{2}) \log \frac{5-s}{2} - \frac{5-s}{2}) \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\exp(\frac{t}{16} \log^2 \frac{5-s}{2\pi n^2})}{n^{1-s}} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B'_0 := \frac{2}{8} \pi^{-(1-s)/2} \sqrt{2\pi} \exp( (\frac{5-s}{2}-\frac{1}{2}) \log \frac{5-s}{2} - \frac{5-s}{2}) \exp( \frac{t}{16} \log^2 \frac{5-s}{2\pi} ) }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ s := \frac{1-y+ix}{2} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ N := \lfloor \frac{\mathrm{Im} s}{2\pi} \rfloor = \lfloor \frac{x}{4\pi} \rfloor. }[/math]
In Effective bounds on H_t - second approach, a more refined approximation was introduced:
- [math]\displaystyle{ A^{eff} := \frac{1}{8} \exp( \frac{t}{4} \alpha_1(\frac{1-y+ix}{2})^2 ) H_{0,1}(\frac{1-y+ix}{2}) \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^{\frac{1-y+ix}{2} + \frac{t \alpha_1(\frac{1-y+ix}{2})}{2} - \frac{t}{4} \log n}} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B^{eff} := \frac{1}{8} \exp( \frac{t}{4} \overline{\alpha_1(\frac{1+y+ix}{2})}^2 ) \overline{H_{0,1}(\frac{1+y+ix}{2})} \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^{\frac{1+y-ix}{2} + \frac{t \overline{\alpha_1(\frac{1+y+ix}{2})}}{2} - \frac{t}{4} \log n}} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B^{eff} := \frac{1}{8} \exp( \frac{t}{4} \overline{\alpha_1(\frac{1+y+ix}{2})}^2 ) \overline{H_{0,1}(\frac{1+y+ix}{2})} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ H_{0,1}(s) := \frac{s (s-1)}{2} \pi^{-s/2} \sqrt{2\pi} \exp( (\frac{s}{2} - \frac{1}{2}) \log \frac{s}{2} - \frac{s}{2} ) }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ \alpha_1(s) := \frac{1}{2s} + \frac{1}{s-1} + \frac{1}{2} \log \frac{s}{2\pi} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ N := \lfloor \sqrt{ \frac{T'}{2\pi}} \rfloor }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ T' := \frac{x}{2} - \frac{\pi t}{8}. }[/math]
Finally, a simplified approximation is
- [math]\displaystyle{ A^{toy} := B^{toy}_0 \exp(i ((\frac{x}{2} + \frac{\pi t}{8}) \log \frac{x}{4\pi} - \frac{x}{2} - \frac{\pi}{4} )) N^{-y} \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^{\frac{1-y+ix}{2} + \frac{t}{4} \log \frac{N^2}{n} + \pi i t/8}} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B^{toy} := B^{toy}_0 \sum_{n=1}^N \frac{1}{n^{\frac{1+y-ix}{2} + \frac{t}{4} \log \frac{N^2}{n} - \pi i t/8}} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ B^{toy}_0 := \frac{\sqrt{2}}{4} \pi^2 N^{\frac{7+y}{2}} \exp( i (-\frac{x}{4} \log \frac{x}{4\pi} + \frac{x}{4} + \frac{9-y}{8} \pi) + \frac{t}{16} (\log \frac{x}{4\pi} - \frac{\pi i}{2})^2 ) e^{-\pi x/8} }[/math]
- [math]\displaystyle{ N := \lfloor \sqrt{\frac{x}{4\pi}} \rfloor. }[/math]
Here is a table comparing the size of the various main terms:
[math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B'_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B^{eff}_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B^{toy}_0 }[/math] |
---|---|---|---|---|
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^3 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (3.4405 + 3.5443 i) \times 10^{-167} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (3.4204 + 3.5383 i) \times 10^{-167} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (3.4426 + 3.5411 i) \times 10^{-167} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (2.3040 + 2.3606 i) \times 10^{-167} }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^4 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-1.1843 - 7.7882 i) \times 10^{-1700} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-1.1180 - 7.7888 i) \times 10^{-1700} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-1.1185 - 7.7879 i) \times 10^{-1700} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-1.1155 - 7.5753 i) \times 10^{-1700} }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^5 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-7.6133 + 2.5065 i) * 10^{-17047} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-7.6134 + 2.5060 i) * 10^{-17047} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-7.6134 + 2.5059 i) * 10^{-17047} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-7.5483 + 2.4848 i) * 10^{-17047} }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^6 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-3.1615 - 7.7093 i) * 10^{-170537} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-3.1676 - 7.7063 i) * 10^{-170537} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-3.1646 - 7.7079 i) * 10^{-170537} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (-3.1590 - 7.6898 i) * 10^{-170537} }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^7 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (2.1676 - 9.6330 i) * 10^{-1705458} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (2.1711 - 9.6236 i) * 10^{-1705458} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (2.1571 - 9.6329 i) * 10^{-1705458} }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ (2.2566 - 9.6000 i) * 10^{-1705458} }[/math] |
Here some typical values of [math]\displaystyle{ B/B_0 }[/math] (note that [math]\displaystyle{ B/B_0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ B'/B'_0 }[/math] are identical):
[math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B/B_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B'/B'_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B^{eff}/B^{eff}_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ B^{toy}/B^{toy}_0 }[/math] |
---|---|---|---|---|
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^3 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7722 + 0.6102 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7722 + 0.6102 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7733 + 0.6101 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7626 + 0.6192 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^4 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7434 - 0.0126 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7434 - 0.0126 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7434 - 0.0126 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.7434 - 0.0124 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^5 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.1218 - 0.3211 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.1218 - 0.3211 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.1218 - 0.3211 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.1219 - 0.3213 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^6 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.3956 - 0.5682 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.3956 - 0.5682 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.3955 - 0.5682 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.3956 - 0.5683 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^7 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.6400 + 0.0198 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.6400 + 0.0198 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.6401 + 0.0198 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 1.6400 - 0.0198 i }[/math] |
Here some typical values of [math]\displaystyle{ A/B_0 }[/math]:
[math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ A/B_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ A'/B'_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ A^{eff}/B^{eff}_0 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ A^{toy}/B^{toy}_0 }[/math] |
---|---|---|---|---|
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^3 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.3856 - 0.0997 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.3857 - 0.0953 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.3854 - 0.1002 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.4036 - 0.0968 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^4 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.2199 - 0.0034 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.2199 - 0.0036 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.2199 - 0.0033 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.2208 - 0.0033 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^5 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.1543 + 0.1660 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.1543 + 0.1660 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.1543 + 0.1660 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ 0.1544 + 0.1663 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^6 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1013 - 0.1887 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1010 - 0.1889 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1011 - 0.1890 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1012 - 0.1888 i }[/math] |
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^7 }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1018 + 0.1135 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1022 + 0.1133 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.1025 + 0.1128 i }[/math] | [math]\displaystyle{ -0.0986 + 0.1163 i }[/math] |
Controlling |A+B|/|B_0|
Some numerical data on [math]\displaystyle{ |A+B/B_0| }[/math] source and also [math]\displaystyle{ \mathrm{Re} \frac{A+B}{B_0} }[/math] source, using a step size of 1 for [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math], suggesting that this ratio tends to oscillate roughly between 0.5 and 3 for medium values of [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math]:
range of [math]\displaystyle{ x }[/math] | minimum value | max value | average value | standard deviation | min real part | max real part |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0-1000 | 0.179 | 4.074 | 1.219 | 0.782 | ||
4.06 | ||||||
1000-2000 | 0.352 | 4.403 | 1.164 | 0.712 | 0.02 | 4.43 |
2000-3000 | 0.352 | 4.050 | 1.145 | 0.671 | 0.15 | 3.99 |
3000-4000 | 0.338 | 4.174 | 1.134 | 0.640 | 0.34 | 4.48 |
4000-5000 | 0.386 | 4.491 | 1.128 | 0.615 | 0.33 | 4.33 |
5000-6000 | 0.377 | 4.327 | 1.120 | 0.599 | 0.377 | 4.327 |
[math]\displaystyle{ 1-10^5 }[/math] | 0.179 | 4.491 | 1.077 | 0.455 | ||
4.48 | ||||||
[math]\displaystyle{ 10^5-2 \times 10^5 }[/math] | 0.488 | 3.339 | 1.053 | 0.361 | 0.48 | 3.32 |
[math]\displaystyle{ 2 \times 10^5-3 \times 10^5 }[/math] | 0.508 | 3.049 | 1.047 | 0.335 | 0.50 | 3.00 |
[math]\displaystyle{ 3 \times 10^5-4 \times 10^5 }[/math] | 0.517 | 2.989 | 1.043 | 0.321 | 0.52 | 2.97 |
[math]\displaystyle{ 4 \times 10^5-5 \times 10^5 }[/math] | 0.535 | 2.826 | 1.041 | 0.310 | 0.53 | 2.82 |
[math]\displaystyle{ 5 \times 10^5-6 \times 10^5 }[/math] | 0.529 | 2.757 | 1.039 | 0.303 | 0.53 | 2.75 |
[math]\displaystyle{ 6 \times 10^5-7 \times 10^5 }[/math] | 0.548 | 2.728 | 1.038 | 0.296 | 0.55 | 2.72 |
...
Controlling |H_t-A-B|/|B_0|
...