The cost of knowledge: Difference between revisions

From Polymath Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 52: Line 52:
* [http://gigaom.com/2012/02/22/why-do-we-need-academic-journals-in-the-first-place/ Why do we need academic journals in the first place?], Mathew Ingram, GigaOM, February 22, 2012.
* [http://gigaom.com/2012/02/22/why-do-we-need-academic-journals-in-the-first-place/ Why do we need academic journals in the first place?], Mathew Ingram, GigaOM, February 22, 2012.
* [http://ittakes30.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/why-boycott-elsevier/ Why boycott Elsevier?], Becky Ward, February 23, 2012.
* [http://ittakes30.wordpress.com/2012/02/23/why-boycott-elsevier/ Why boycott Elsevier?], Becky Ward, February 23, 2012.
* [http://nghoussoub.com/2012/02/24/elseviers-first-concessions-to-its-enablers/ Elsevier’s first concessions to its “enablers”], Nassif Ghoussoub, February 24, 2012.
* [http://breakingculture.tumblr.com/post/18380845829/elseviers-strategy-and-the-long-war Elsevier's strategy and the long war], Sean Johnson Andrews, February 27, 2012.
* [http://breakingculture.tumblr.com/post/18380845829/elseviers-strategy-and-the-long-war Elsevier's strategy and the long war], Sean Johnson Andrews, February 27, 2012.
* [http://gavialib.com/2012/02/elsevier-blinks-once/ Elsevier blinks, once], Library Loon, February 27, 2012.
* [http://gavialib.com/2012/02/elsevier-blinks-once/ Elsevier blinks, once], Library Loon, February 27, 2012.
Line 66: Line 67:
* [http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/02/28/librarians-fakeelsevier-boycott Academics must be applauded for making a stand by boycotting Elsevier. It’s time for librarians to join the conversation on the future of dissemination, but not join the boycott.], Dave Puplett, February 28, 2012.
* [http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2012/02/28/librarians-fakeelsevier-boycott Academics must be applauded for making a stand by boycotting Elsevier. It’s time for librarians to join the conversation on the future of dissemination, but not join the boycott.], Dave Puplett, February 28, 2012.
* [http://mhpbooks.com/50980/elsevier-backs-down-in-response-to-academic-uprising-or-does-it/ Elsevier backs down in response to academic uprising … or does it?], Dennis Johnson, February 29, 2012.
* [http://mhpbooks.com/50980/elsevier-backs-down-in-response-to-academic-uprising-or-does-it/ Elsevier backs down in response to academic uprising … or does it?], Dennis Johnson, February 29, 2012.
* [http://www.universityaffairs.ca/margin-notes/elsevier-journal-boycott-first-skirmish-in-a-longer-battle/ Elsevier journal boycott: first skirmish in a longer battle], Leo Charbonneau, February 29, 2012.


=== News aggregators ===
=== News aggregators ===

Revision as of 23:46, 29 February 2012

The cost of knowledge is a web page at which one may register a protest against the practices of Elsevier by pledging not to submit a paper to an Elsevier journal, not to referee for an Elsevier journal, not to join an editorial board of an Elsevier journal, or some combination of the three. This site was inspired by the following blog post:

A more detailed statement of purpose of the boycott, can be found here. It is written and signed by Scott Aaronson, Douglas N. Arnold, Artur Ávila, John Baez, Folkmar Bornemann, Danny Calegari, Henry Cohn, Ingrid Daubechies, Jordan Ellenberg, Matthew Emerton, Marie Farge, David Gabai, Timothy Gowers, Ben Green, Martin Grötschel, Michael Harris, Frédéric Hélein, Rob Kirby, Vincent Lafforgue, Gregory F. Lawler, Randall J. LeVeque, Laszlo Lovasz, Peter J. Olver, Olof Sisask, Terence Tao, Richard Taylor, Bernard Teissier, Burt Totaro, Lloyd N. Trefethen, Takashi Tsuboi, Marie-France Vigneras, Wendelin Werner, Amie Wilkinson, and G?unter M. Ziegler.

See also the blog associated to the cost of knowledge site. A poster for the protest may be found here.

There have since been many reactions to this protest:

Reactions from blogs

News aggregators

Coverage by the media

Open letters to Elsevier

Responses by Elsevier

Other coverage

See also this list of links, which is focused more around the Research Works Act, but also contains many links regarding the boycott, as well as Math 2.0, a discussion forum for all topics related to the future of mathematical publishing.

Other related links may be found at the page on journal publishing reform.