Talk:Fourier-analytic proof of Sperner: Difference between revisions
From Polymath Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:: I am afraid now the coefficient 16 is missing! ;-) | :: I am afraid now the coefficient 16 is missing! ;-) | ||
:: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks! | :: Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks! | ||
:: One more thing. The conclusion of Lemma 1 involves expectation, but there is nothing random in the assumptions! What does the lemma actually say? | |||
Revision as of 05:34, 28 February 2009
In (5), isn't the coefficient 4 in front of the sum missing?
- Er, yeah. Well caught :-) Terry 19:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- I am afraid now the coefficient 16 is missing! ;-)
- Also, with the illiterates like myself in mind, could you drop several words of motivation for (3) and (6)? Thanks!
- One more thing. The conclusion of Lemma 1 involves expectation, but there is nothing random in the assumptions! What does the lemma actually say?
