Fujimura's problem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:<math>\Delta_n := \{ (a,b,c) \in {\Bbb Z}_+^3: a+b+c=n \}</math> | :<math>\Delta_n := \{ (a,b,c) \in {\Bbb Z}_+^3: a+b+c=n \}</math> | ||
which contains no equilateral triangles. Fujimura's problem is to compute <math>\overline{c}^\mu_n</math>. This quantity is relevant to a certain "hyper-optimistic" version of DHJ(3). | which contains no equilateral triangles <math>(a+r,b,c), (a,b+r,c), (a,b,c+r)</math> with <math>r > 0</math>; call such sets ''triangle-free''. (It is an interesting variant to also allow negative r, thus allowing "upside-down" triangles, but this does not seem to be as closely connected to DHJ(3).) Fujimura's problem is to compute <math>\overline{c}^\mu_n</math>. This quantity is relevant to a certain "hyper-optimistic" version of DHJ(3). | ||
== n=0 == | == n=0 == | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== n=3 == | == n=3 == | ||
[Some cleanup required here] | |||
Deleting (0,3,0), (0,2,1), (2,1,0), (1,0,2) from <math>\Delta_3</math> shows that <math>\overline{c}^\mu_3 \geq 6</math>. In fact | Deleting (0,3,0), (0,2,1), (2,1,0), (1,0,2) from <math>\Delta_3</math> shows that <math>\overline{c}^\mu_3 \geq 6</math>. In fact | ||
<math>\overline{c}^\mu_3 = 6</math>: | <math>\overline{c}^\mu_3 = 6</math>: with only three removals each of these (non-overlapping) triangles must have one removal: | ||
set A: (0,3,0) (0,2,1) (1,2,0) | |||
set B: (0,1,2) (0,0,3) (1,0,2) | |||
set C: (2,1,0) (2,0,1) (3,0,0) | |||
Consider choices from set A: | |||
(0,3,0) leaves triangle (0,2,1) (1,2,0) (1,1,1) | |||
(0,2,1) forces a second removal at (2,1,0) [otherwise there is triangle at (1,2,0) (1,1,1) (2,1,0)] but then none of the choices for third removal work | |||
(1,2,0) is symmetrical with (0,2,1) | |||
== n=4 == | == n=4 == | ||
:<math>\overline{c}^\mu_4=9:</math> | :<math>\overline{c}^\mu_4=9:</math> | ||
The set of all <math>(a,b,c)</math> in <math>\Delta_4</math> with exactly one of a,b,c =0, has 9 elements and | The set of all <math>(a,b,c)</math> in <math>\Delta_4</math> with exactly one of a,b,c =0, has 9 elements and is triangle-free. | ||
(Note that it does contain the equilateral triangle (2,2,0),(2,0,2),(0,2,2), so would not qualify for the generalised version of Fujimura's problem in which <math>r</math> is allowed to be negative.) | |||
Let <math>S\subset \Delta_4</math> be a set without equilateral triangles. If <math>(0,0,4)\in S</math>, there can only be one of <math>(0,x,4-x)</math> and <math>(x,0,4-x)</math> in S for <math>x=1,2,3,4</math>. Thus there can only be 5 elements in S with <math>a=0</math> or <math>b=0</math>. The set of elements with <math>a,b>0</math> is isomorphic to <math>\Delta_2</math>, so S can at most have 4 elements in this set. So <math>|S|\leq 4+5=9</math>. Similar if S contain (0,4,0) or (4,0,0). So if <math>|S|>9</math> S doesn’t contain any of these. Also, S can’t contain all of <math>(0,1,3), (0,3,1), (2,1,1)</math>. Similar for <math>(3,0,1), (1,0,3),(1,2,1)</math> and <math>(1,3,0), (3,1,0), (1,1,2)</math>. So now we have found 6 elements not in S, but <math>|\Delta_4|=15</math>, so <math>S\leq 15-6=9</math>. | Let <math>S\subset \Delta_4</math> be a set without equilateral triangles. If <math>(0,0,4)\in S</math>, there can only be one of <math>(0,x,4-x)</math> and <math>(x,0,4-x)</math> in S for <math>x=1,2,3,4</math>. Thus there can only be 5 elements in S with <math>a=0</math> or <math>b=0</math>. The set of elements with <math>a,b>0</math> is isomorphic to <math>\Delta_2</math>, so S can at most have 4 elements in this set. So <math>|S|\leq 4+5=9</math>. Similar if S contain (0,4,0) or (4,0,0). So if <math>|S|>9</math> S doesn’t contain any of these. Also, S can’t contain all of <math>(0,1,3), (0,3,1), (2,1,1)</math>. Similar for <math>(3,0,1), (1,0,3),(1,2,1)</math> and <math>(1,3,0), (3,1,0), (1,1,2)</math>. So now we have found 6 elements not in S, but <math>|\Delta_4|=15</math>, so <math>S\leq 15-6=9</math>. |
Revision as of 08:04, 13 February 2009
Let [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_n }[/math] the largest subset of the triangular grid
- [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_n := \{ (a,b,c) \in {\Bbb Z}_+^3: a+b+c=n \} }[/math]
which contains no equilateral triangles [math]\displaystyle{ (a+r,b,c), (a,b+r,c), (a,b,c+r) }[/math] with [math]\displaystyle{ r \gt 0 }[/math]; call such sets triangle-free. (It is an interesting variant to also allow negative r, thus allowing "upside-down" triangles, but this does not seem to be as closely connected to DHJ(3).) Fujimura's problem is to compute [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_n }[/math]. This quantity is relevant to a certain "hyper-optimistic" version of DHJ(3).
n=0
It is clear that [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_0 = 1 }[/math].
n=1
It is clear that [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_1 = 2 }[/math].
n=2
It is clear that [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_2 = 4 }[/math] (e.g. remove (0,2,0) and (1,0,1) from [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_2 }[/math]).
n=3
[Some cleanup required here]
Deleting (0,3,0), (0,2,1), (2,1,0), (1,0,2) from [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_3 }[/math] shows that [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_3 \geq 6 }[/math]. In fact [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_3 = 6 }[/math]: with only three removals each of these (non-overlapping) triangles must have one removal: set A: (0,3,0) (0,2,1) (1,2,0) set B: (0,1,2) (0,0,3) (1,0,2) set C: (2,1,0) (2,0,1) (3,0,0)
Consider choices from set A: (0,3,0) leaves triangle (0,2,1) (1,2,0) (1,1,1) (0,2,1) forces a second removal at (2,1,0) [otherwise there is triangle at (1,2,0) (1,1,1) (2,1,0)] but then none of the choices for third removal work (1,2,0) is symmetrical with (0,2,1)
n=4
- [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_4=9: }[/math]
The set of all [math]\displaystyle{ (a,b,c) }[/math] in [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_4 }[/math] with exactly one of a,b,c =0, has 9 elements and is triangle-free. (Note that it does contain the equilateral triangle (2,2,0),(2,0,2),(0,2,2), so would not qualify for the generalised version of Fujimura's problem in which [math]\displaystyle{ r }[/math] is allowed to be negative.)
Let [math]\displaystyle{ S\subset \Delta_4 }[/math] be a set without equilateral triangles. If [math]\displaystyle{ (0,0,4)\in S }[/math], there can only be one of [math]\displaystyle{ (0,x,4-x) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ (x,0,4-x) }[/math] in S for [math]\displaystyle{ x=1,2,3,4 }[/math]. Thus there can only be 5 elements in S with [math]\displaystyle{ a=0 }[/math] or [math]\displaystyle{ b=0 }[/math]. The set of elements with [math]\displaystyle{ a,b\gt 0 }[/math] is isomorphic to [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_2 }[/math], so S can at most have 4 elements in this set. So [math]\displaystyle{ |S|\leq 4+5=9 }[/math]. Similar if S contain (0,4,0) or (4,0,0). So if [math]\displaystyle{ |S|\gt 9 }[/math] S doesn’t contain any of these. Also, S can’t contain all of [math]\displaystyle{ (0,1,3), (0,3,1), (2,1,1) }[/math]. Similar for [math]\displaystyle{ (3,0,1), (1,0,3),(1,2,1) }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ (1,3,0), (3,1,0), (1,1,2) }[/math]. So now we have found 6 elements not in S, but [math]\displaystyle{ |\Delta_4|=15 }[/math], so [math]\displaystyle{ S\leq 15-6=9 }[/math].
n=5
- [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_5=12 }[/math]
The set of all (a,b,c) in [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_5 }[/math] with exactly one of a,b,c=0 has 12 elements and doesn’t contain any equilateral triangles.
Let [math]\displaystyle{ S\subset \Delta_5 }[/math] be a set without equilateral triangles. If [math]\displaystyle{ (0,0,5)\in S }[/math], there can only be one of (0,x,5-x) and (x,0,5-x) in S for x=1,2,3,4,5. Thus there can only be 6 elements in S with a=0 or b=0. The set of element with a,b>0 is isomorphic to [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_3 }[/math], so S can at most have 6 elements in this set. So [math]\displaystyle{ |S|\leq 6+6=12 }[/math]. Similar if S contain (0,5,0) or (5,0,0). So if |S| >12 S doesn’t contain any of these. S can only contain 2 point in each of the following equilateral triangles:
(3,1,1),(0,4,1),(0,1,4)
(4,1,0),(1,4,0),(1,1,3)
(4,0,1),(1,3,1),(1,0,4)
(1,2,2),(0,3,2),(0,2,3)
(3,2,0),(2,3,0),(2,2,1)
(3,0,2),(2,1,2),(2,0,3)
So now we have found 9 elements not in S, but [math]\displaystyle{ |\Delta_5|=21 }[/math], so [math]\displaystyle{ S\leq 21-9=12 }[/math].
General n
A lower bound for [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_n }[/math] is 2n for [math]\displaystyle{ n \geq 1 }[/math], by removing (n,0,0), the triangle (n-2,1,1) (0,n-1,1) (0,1,n-1), and all points on the edges of and inside the same triangle. In a similar spirit, we have the lower bound
- [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_{n+1} \geq \overline{c}^\mu_n + 2 }[/math]
for [math]\displaystyle{ n \geq 1 }[/math], because we can take an example for [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_n }[/math] (which cannot be all of [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_n }[/math]) and add two points on the bottom row, chosen so that the triangle they form has third vertex outside of the original example.
An asymptotically superior lower bound for [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_n }[/math] is 3(n-1), made of all points in [math]\displaystyle{ \Delta_n }[/math] with exactly one coordinate equal to zero.
A trivial upper bound is
- [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_{n+1} \leq \overline{c}^\mu_n + n+2 }[/math]
since deleting the bottom row of a equilateral-triangle-free-set gives another equilateral-triangle-free-set. We also have the asymptotically superior bound
- [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_{n+2} \leq \overline{c}^\mu_n + \frac{3n+2}{2} }[/math]
which comes from deleting two bottom rows of a triangle-free set and counting how many vertices are possible in those rows.
Another upper bound comes from counting the triangles. There are [math]\displaystyle{ \binom{n+2}{3} }[/math] triangles, and each point belongs to n of them. So you must remove at least (n+2)(n+1)/6 points to remove all triangles, leaving (n+2)(n+1)/3 points as an upper bound for [math]\displaystyle{ \overline{c}^\mu_n }[/math].