Lemma 8: Difference between revisions

From Polymath Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs)
Created page with "This page proves a lemma for the m=13 case of FUNC. ==Lemma 8:== If <math>\mathcal{A}</math> contains 2 size 6 sets with a 5 element intersection, then <math>\mathcal{A}<..."
 
Tomtom2357 (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:
==|K|=3:==
==|K|=3:==


In this case, the only sets with a possible deficit are the <math>C_3</math> sets. These each have deficit 1, so since the top set has surplus 7, there must be at least 8 of them.
In this case, the only sets with a possible deficit are the <math>C_3</math> sets, which all have deficit one. Pick one of these sets, let it be abc (where a, b, c, d, e, f, g are non-specified but distinct elements of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}). The deficit of every set that doesn't intersect abc in at least two elements can be matched by the surplus of its union with abc, like this:


(Needs more work)
ade, bde, cde: abcde
 
The former sets all have deficit one, and abcde has surplus 3, cancelling all the deficit out. We can then map 4 of the remaining <math>C_3</math> sets to their union with abc like so:
 
abd: abcd
abe: abce
abf: abcf
abg: abcg
 
This leaves 9 remaining <math>C_3</math> sets (including abc itself) that can cuae a net deficit. The <math>C_7</math> set has surplus 7, and the <math>C_6</math> sets have surplus 5, so if any of the <math>C_6</math> sets are in C, then the surplus is greater than the deficit. However, if none of them are in C, that means that all sets contain both 6 and 7, otherwise one of 123456, 123457 are in C, due to the union between them and the original {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7} sets. However, there are only 5 such <math>C_3</math> sets (167, 267, 367, 467, 567), and just those cannot match the surplus of the <math>C_7</math> set.
 
Thus in this case, the surplus is always greater than the deficit.


==|K|=4:==
==|K|=4:==

Revision as of 01:42, 10 November 2016

This page proves a lemma for the m=13 case of FUNC.

Lemma 8:

If [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] contains 2 size 6 sets with a 5 element intersection, then [math]\displaystyle{ \mathcal{A} }[/math] is Frankl's.

WLOG let those sets be 123456, 123457. Let w(x)=2 if x=1,2,3,4,5,6,7, and w(x)=1 otherwise. The target weight is 10.

|K|=0:

In this case there are only four sets, the bottom set, 123456, 123457, 1234567. The bottom set has deficit 10, but the other sets have combined surplus 8, so the deficit is only 2 greater than the surplus in this case.

|K|=1 or 2:

In this case, the smallest sets allowed have weight at least 10, so there is not deficit in this case.

|K|=3:

In this case, the only sets with a possible deficit are the [math]\displaystyle{ C_3 }[/math] sets, which all have deficit one. Pick one of these sets, let it be abc (where a, b, c, d, e, f, g are non-specified but distinct elements of {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}). The deficit of every set that doesn't intersect abc in at least two elements can be matched by the surplus of its union with abc, like this:

ade, bde, cde: abcde

The former sets all have deficit one, and abcde has surplus 3, cancelling all the deficit out. We can then map 4 of the remaining [math]\displaystyle{ C_3 }[/math] sets to their union with abc like so:

abd: abcd abe: abce abf: abcf abg: abcg

This leaves 9 remaining [math]\displaystyle{ C_3 }[/math] sets (including abc itself) that can cuae a net deficit. The [math]\displaystyle{ C_7 }[/math] set has surplus 7, and the [math]\displaystyle{ C_6 }[/math] sets have surplus 5, so if any of the [math]\displaystyle{ C_6 }[/math] sets are in C, then the surplus is greater than the deficit. However, if none of them are in C, that means that all sets contain both 6 and 7, otherwise one of 123456, 123457 are in C, due to the union between them and the original {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6}, {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7} sets. However, there are only 5 such [math]\displaystyle{ C_3 }[/math] sets (167, 267, 367, 467, 567), and just those cannot match the surplus of the [math]\displaystyle{ C_7 }[/math] set.

Thus in this case, the surplus is always greater than the deficit.

|K|=4:

In this case, the only sets with a possible deficit are the [math]\displaystyle{ C_2 }[/math] sets.

|K|=5:

|K|=6:

In this case, only the [math]\displaystyle{ C_0 }[/math] set and the [math]\displaystyle{ C_1 }[/math] sets can contribute to the discrepancy. However, if any of those are in C, then at least one of 123456 or 123457 are in C also, so the surplus is at least 10+8=18. Thus all the [math]\displaystyle{ C_0 }[/math] and [math]\displaystyle{ C_1 }[/math] sets are in C to match the surplus. But then both of 123456 and 123457 are in C, so the surplus is at least 26, which is more than the maximum possible deficit (18). Either way, the surplus is at least two more than the deficit, cancelling out the |K|=0 case