User contributions for Tomtom2357

27 October 2016

• 04:5804:58, 27 October 2016 diff hist −253‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 3: The smallest set has size 5
• 04:5804:58, 27 October 2016 diff hist −3,147‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 4: The smallest set has size 6
• 04:5704:57, 27 October 2016 diff hist +31‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 4: The smallest set has size 6
• 04:5504:55, 27 October 2016 diff hist +253‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 3: The smallest set has size 5
• 04:3704:37, 27 October 2016 diff hist +2,352‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ Completing case 4
• 04:0204:02, 27 October 2016 diff hist +417‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 4: The smallest set has size 6
• 03:2103:21, 27 October 2016 diff hist −5‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 4: The smallest set has size 6
• 03:2103:21, 27 October 2016 diff hist +352‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎ →‎Case 4: The smallest set has size 6
• 02:5702:57, 27 October 2016 diff hist +17‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎No edit summary
• 02:3602:36, 27 October 2016 diff hist +14‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎No edit summary
• 02:3302:33, 27 October 2016 diff hist +7‎ M=13 case of FUNC ‎No edit summary
• 02:3002:30, 27 October 2016 diff hist +1,031‎ N M=13 case of FUNC ‎ Created the page, set up the four main cases to consider
• 01:3801:38, 27 October 2016 diff hist +67‎ Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎ Added a new section on the m=13 case current
• 01:2301:23, 27 October 2016 diff hist +211‎ Talk:Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎ Question about the m=12 case

16 February 2016

• 07:3307:33, 16 February 2016 diff hist +894‎ Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎No edit summary

9 February 2016

• 19:1719:17, 9 February 2016 diff hist −10‎ Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎ →‎Lemma 1
• 19:1719:17, 9 February 2016 diff hist +11‎ Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎ →‎Lemma 1
• 19:1519:15, 9 February 2016 diff hist +4,002‎ Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎ →‎Introduction
• 06:4006:40, 9 February 2016 diff hist +1,054‎ Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎No edit summary
• 06:0006:00, 9 February 2016 diff hist −1‎ Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎No edit summary
• 06:0006:00, 9 February 2016 diff hist +304‎ N Find set configurations that imply FUNC ‎ Created page with "== Introduction == One of the first observations on the conjecture is that if a union closed family contains a singleton set {x}, then the set <math>\mathcal{A}_x = \{A \in \..."
• 05:4405:44, 9 February 2016 diff hist 0‎ Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎No edit summary
• 05:1805:18, 9 February 2016 diff hist +104‎ Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎ Added section on general proof strategies
• 05:0405:04, 9 February 2016 diff hist +2‎ Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎No edit summary

8 February 2016

• 23:2923:29, 8 February 2016 diff hist +1‎ Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎No edit summary
• 23:2823:28, 8 February 2016 diff hist +70‎ m Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎ Added link

1 February 2016

• 22:5922:59, 1 February 2016 diff hist +6‎ m Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎No edit summary
• 22:5822:58, 1 February 2016 diff hist +110‎ Frankl's union-closed conjecture ‎ Added another condition for Frankl's conjecture to be true

12 August 2015

• 23:2723:27, 12 August 2015 diff hist +1,037‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 4: f(61)=1 current

30 July 2015

• 21:2821:28, 30 July 2015 diff hist +12‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 4: f(61)=1

28 July 2015

• 20:4420:44, 28 July 2015 diff hist +18‎ Human proof that completely multiplicative sequences have discrepancy greater than 3 ‎ →‎Case 1.2.1: f(2)=f(11)=f(13)=f(29)=1, f(7)=-1 current
• 20:3920:39, 28 July 2015 diff hist +53‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ Started Case 4
• 03:0603:06, 28 July 2015 diff hist −6‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ Completed Case 3
• 03:0603:06, 28 July 2015 diff hist −6‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 3.2: f(59)=f(79)=f(89)=1, f(83)=-1
• 03:0603:06, 28 July 2015 diff hist −6‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 3.1: f(59)=f(79)=f(83)=1
• 03:0603:06, 28 July 2015 diff hist +30‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 3: f(59)=1
• 03:0203:02, 28 July 2015 diff hist +1,283‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ Completed Case 3.3

16 July 2015

• 02:3302:33, 16 July 2015 diff hist +636‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 3: f(59)=1
• 01:4401:44, 16 July 2015 diff hist 0‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 3: f(59)=1

6 July 2015

• 00:4200:42, 6 July 2015 diff hist +257‎ Side Proof 10 ‎No edit summary

5 July 2015

• 23:0123:01, 5 July 2015 diff hist +125‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 2.2: f(41)=1
• 20:4220:42, 5 July 2015 diff hist +338‎ Side Proof 10 ‎No edit summary
• 19:1019:10, 5 July 2015 diff hist +91‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 2.1.2: f(41)=f(61)=1, f(73)=-1
• 19:0819:08, 5 July 2015 diff hist +38‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 2.1.2: f(41)=f(61)=1, f(73)=-1
• 19:0519:05, 5 July 2015 diff hist +15‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 2.1.2: f(73)=-1
• 19:0419:04, 5 July 2015 diff hist +4‎ Side Proof 10 ‎ →‎Case 2: f(73)=-1

23 June 2015

• 01:4001:40, 23 June 2015 diff hist +111‎ Side Proof 10 ‎No edit summary
• 00:2100:21, 23 June 2015 diff hist +23‎ Human proof that completely multiplicative sequences have discrepancy greater than 3 ‎ →‎Case 1.1: f(2)=f(7)=1
• 00:2000:20, 23 June 2015 diff hist +24‎ Human proof that completely multiplicative sequences have discrepancy greater than 3 ‎ →‎Case 1.1: f(2)=f(7)=1
• 00:1700:17, 23 June 2015 diff hist +4‎ Side Proof 10 ‎No edit summary